preview

How Did The Change In Hamlet's First Soliloquy

Decent Essays

Hamlet, by the end of the play had drastically changed from the Hamlet in the beginning of the play because of his altering views on death and fate, which is shown mainly through his soliloquies and throughout other certain events. This change resulted in Hamlet overcoming his indecisiveness and in the end he manages to find peace.
In Hamlet’s first soliloquy, we are given an insight on his feelings. Because of his father’s death and his mother quick marriage to his uncle, Hamlet is completely devastated and depressed. He even wishes that his “too too solid flesh would melt” or that the “Everlasting” was not “against self-slaughter”, admitting that he would rather take his own life then continue living in a world that doesn’t seem to hold …show more content…

He states that it might be nobler to face the “slings and arrows of outrageous fortune”, where you live to put up with all the obstacle and problems that fate throws in your path or to choose death, where you can easily put an end to your troubles. However, by the end of the soliloquy Hamlet doesn’t just see death as a way to escape. He now sees that “the dread of something after death…makes coward of us all” (Shakespeare 64). The fear of not knowing what there is to face after you die makes us cowards and in turn, it misdirects the actions we first set out to do. Hence, Hamlet is blaming his fear of death on his inability to take action towards his …show more content…

He tells him that a “man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm”. This is alluding to the cycle of life and how regardless of how high your social status is when you’re alive, Hamlet points out that all men die and return to the soil. Death equalizes everybody once you die. This view is also emphasized during act 5, scene 1. As Hamlet is watching the grave digger he notices the skull heads and states that the “skull had a tongue in it and could sing once” (Shakespeare 125). Here he’s pondering the idea of who that person could have been. It could’ve been a lawyer or a landowner, or maybe even Alexander the Great but once again he states that in death it does not matter. We all turn into another pile of bones and

Get Access