Question #2: In the book The Witch of Blackbird Pond by Elizabeth George Speare, my feelings towards the character Matthew Wood changed throughout the story. At first I didn't really like him. He seemed unwelcoming to his niece Kit who had just arrived from a nine day trip on a ship. “Seven times he returned bending his tall frame to enter the doorway, and with wordless disapproval set down one after the other the seven trunks. (Speare 38) Next, he made fun of Kit’s clothes. On page 43 it says, “Her uncle regarded her with scorn. “No one in my family has any use for such frippery,” he said coldly.” (Speare 43) The last reason why I didn’t really get a good vibe from him was because he forbid Kit from seeing her friend Hannah. I understood why he didn’t really allow it because everyone in the town believed she was a witch, but he called her heretic which was rude. …show more content…
I forbid it.”(Speare 132) Though in the beginning of the book I didn't like him very much, I respected him as the story went on. In the book, his daughter Mercy explains to Kit why he didn’t really want another girl in the house. She says, “And it has been a struggle, trying to manage without a son to help.” (Speare 82) At this point I get that he has been through a lot. He also has to deal with the king as he does not agree with him very much. This is another reason why I respect him much more than I used to; he stands up for what he believes. On page 61, Matthew says, “Do you think we have labored and sacrificed all these years to build up a free government only to hand it over now without a murmur?”(Speare 61) I respect that because he doesn’t care what anyone says and will commit to whatever he
After her grandfather’s death in 1687, 16 year-old Kit feels that she must leave and sail to the only relatives she knows of, her uncle and aunt in Wethersfield, Connecticut. She desperately travels there on a ship called the Dolphin, where she meets a gentleman named Nat. She and Nat have a very playful relationship, Nat always has a mocking grin on his face and Kit occasionally flirts with him on the boat. When she arrives in Wethersfield, Connecticut, she is taken by surprise at the dull landscape and endless fields. Kit meets her uncle, a strict and sometimes grumpy man named Matthew Wood, her aunt, a sweet and caring woman named Rachel, her cousin Judith, a picky and vain young lady who’s otherwise kind, and her other cousin Mercy, a
Nathaniel Hawthorne was a man who was both plagued and absorbed by the legacy of the Puritans in New England. He was related to John Hathorne, a Puritan judge during the infamous Salem Witch trials of 1692. In The Scarlet Letter, his fictional account of mid-17th century Boston presents an opportunity to examine different themes commonly associated with Puritans. Particularly the nature of sin, personal identity and the repression of natural urges are themes that appear repeatedly through the novel. While his account of this time period may not be completely historically accurate, it is indicative of the persistent thematic influence of Puritan culture on American and New England society.
It is often considered that outward appearance will be the first thing notice when establishing a first impression of you, but some may beg to differ. When evaluating the impression someone has left on someone else, it is important to note the personality of said person and how they present themselves; what tone of voice they’ve used towards another individual. Sarah in the Heretic’s Daughter begins by presenting herself in a way which many people dislike and find to be rather annoying, but as the novel evolves, so does she. In the Heretic’s Daughter, Kathleen Kent establishes a sensitive, yet dramatic and opinionated character through characterization and tone in her vivid word choice to create the character of Sarah and allow you to see her evolve as the novel plays out.
In the Salem witch trials about two-hundred people were accused of witchcraft, twenty of whom were executed. In, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, he presents a character known as John Proctor. He was considered a good-looking man almost to the point where he became intimidating. Ultimately, throughout the story, this character goes from being someone who could care less about others’ feelings, to someone who becomes nobler in a way. As it’s been noticed, John Proctor is a dynamic character that changes throughout the story.
Austen describes Willoughby through three different perspectives. The first perspective is the narrater’s perspective, next Marianne’s perspective and lastly Elinor’s perspective. These different perspectives reflect the different tones Austen uses. Austen seems to support Elinor’s view of Willoughby, which suggests that caution in relationships is the overall message of the book.
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter, the young Arthur Dimmesdale is a highly respected reverend in 17th century puritanical Massachusetts. However, he is the most morally ambiguous character in the novel because of the one great sin he commits and fails to readily confess. For this, he suffers an internal affliction that destabilizes his physical and spiritual composure. Dimmesdale’s sin was detrimental, but this action cannot qualify him as a bad person because in all other aspects, he is as righteous as the Puritans came. This moral ambiguity of Dimmesdale plays a pivotal role in the novel because it allows the reader to distinguish between true good and evil.
In Elizabeth George Speare’s The Witch of Blackbird Pond, Kit, a young girl from Barbados comes to Wethersfield, Connecticut and changes her life forever.
If the townspeople as a collective could be considered a ‘character,’ taking into account that they many of the mentioned individuals share the same characteristics, aside from the minister and his wife, then there are Romantic characters aside from the main ones in Hawthorne’s story. When the villagers first see the minister’s veil, one exclaims that “‘[Their] parson has gone mad,’” without taking a moment to consider any of the minister’s
Do you act differently around certain people? Are your actions different because you want to impress a girl, the popular kids, or your teacher you want a letter of recommendation from? All around the world, people try to disguise their true self, just so they can fit in and be someone they are not. In The Scarlet Letter, Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale had been living behind a mask for seven excruciating years, as he remained unwilling to face the repercussions of society for his adulterous affair with Hester Prynne. If Dimmesdale was his honest and true self, he would have escaped death. While the epic is exaggerated through paranormal and supernatural occurrences, many of the punishments inflicted and morals questioned are quite topical today. Nathaniel Hawthorne encourages the readers to ‘show freely to the world’, no matter how daunting that personality may be (410). Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale’s downfall affirms the damaging effects of falsifying one’s disposition in The Scarlet Letter and today’s society.
Matthew next describes Jesus through his passionate and loving ministry. The many stories of his work among the people are evidence of who he was as a person. He was a teacher, preacher, and healer to everyone who knew of God’s righteousness. Jesus had strong faith in his Father, and it was important to him that others did as well. Jesus spoke of the proper way to live life in order to be granted eternal life. Some of the first teachings that Matthew mentions in his gospel are of Jesus’
The character is John Proctor, John is a local farmer who lives just outside of the village. In the begin John confronts Abigail about the situation between all the witchcraft talk in Salem. Abigail had mentions about how John was having an affair on his wife Elizabeth Proctor with Abigail. As a man John is he declines everything Abigail had said. On page 32 Proctor and Abigail are having a conversion and this is when brings up when her and John had touched and h had replied by saying” Aye, we did not.” Later on in the play in Act 4 Elizabeth is being asked questions about John in the court. They had asked her that if John had ever been dishonest or lost interest in her whatsoever. Therefore Elizabeth had answered the question and she hdad said “My husband-is a goodly man, sir.” on page 87 in act 3. Furthermore, when the conversation was over John had told Elizabeth when they were taking her away that he had confessed and it is okay to talk about his sins and how he had turn on Elizabeth. Which really shows how John really had enough time to change and point out his bad actions. Some might argue about how he did not really changed that much, as well as he had to confess to protect Elizabeth. But John did not ever fixs her actions before hand so he really did change or switch throughout the
Jesus' decision to physically cast out the moneylenders from the temple stands as one of the most interesting events of his life, because it represents what seems to be the only moment in the Gospel narratives where he becomes visibly angry to the point of physical action. While one could argue that Jesus is frequently (and justifiably) angry with the disciples from time to time, this is the only moment that Jesus' anger moves him to physical force. Although the event is recorded in all four of the Gospels, this study will focus specifically on its rendering in Matthew, because when considered in the context of Matthew's larger narrative, one can see how Jesus' decision to cleanse the temple does not represent an aberration in either his character or theological message, but rather the natural culmination of Jesus' life and works prior to that point, and demonstrates a kind of revolutionary, anti-authoritarian element of Jesus' message of salvation that is all too often overlooked by Christians and critics alike.
This is a summary of a No Travel Seminar on a Study of the Gospel of Matthew. The seminar was lead by Dr. John Dunaway who is a professor at NTS and has served as a pastor for over 50 years. After his brief self-introduction, he began his presentation with an overview of the Gospel of Matthew, followed by a more elaborated narrative summarizing the gospel, and he finished with brief closing remarks. Throughout this enthusiastic presentation, Dr. Dunaway made reference to remarks by multiple prominent commentators, which added substance to his narrative, even though none were explicitly stated upfront.
People are known to change, whether it is liked or not, there is no way of stopping change, and people know this; what most people don’t know, is how similar character change is to human change. In the wonderfully written play 'The Crucible', by Arthur Miller, many of his characters change in big ways as the story progresses, and three of these characters that changed the most are; John Proctor, Reverend Hale, and Elizabeth Proctor. These characters change a great deal throughout this play.
Likewise, Kincaid wrongly judges her mother. In her essay, “The Estrangement’” she tells that she stopped talking to her mother after she spoke unkindly about her in a conversation they had through the phone. She describes her mother as a person that was seen as nice by others, but not by her nor her younger siblings. She asserts that her mother, “said horrible things to us more often than not” and that the nice person everyone saw in her “was not at all known to us” (Kincaid 170). In other words, her mother was unaffectionate to them. A statement she makes evident when she tells about the time his step-father was buried next to her mother and her uncertainty of whether he would have liked that based on her and her siblings preferences. She claims, “we would rather be dead than spend eternity lying next to her” (Kincaid 170). In other terms, they despised her mother for the treatment she gave them. However, later in the text, there is a shift in tone: from hate to acknowledgement and love. Her perception of her mother changes after she realizes how