preview

Hamlet is encumbered with securing retribution on his murdered father’s behalf from the King of

Decent Essays

Hamlet is encumbered with securing retribution on his murdered father’s behalf from the King of Denmark, Claudius. In an effort to murder Claudius, Hamlet risks alienation occurring within multiple psychological parallels. The variants of indifference that risk Hamlet’s psychological sense of identity are his religion, his morals, his compatriots, his mother, and alienation from women. Hamlet feels self-actualized from following religious principles of living. It is seen by Hamlet’s refusal to commit murder, thus preventing him from committing suicide. At the time, he felt like doing it to avenge his father’s death. Both murder and suicide are considered sins (Cahn, 1996, p. 97).
To be, or not to be- that is the question:
Whether 'tis …show more content…

It would violate his moral conviction of being loyal. Hamlet is alienating himself from his moral sense as he decides to put on an antic disposition in order to make the King think that he is losing grasp of reality. Hamlet is lost within his inner and external conflicts (Stockton & Shakespeare, 2000, p. 09-10). Everyone around Hamlet, except for Horatio, is unaware of his deception assisted by putting on an illusion to protect the King. His other friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, are unaware of his inner turmoil. Hamlet forces himself to be insincere and loses his attachment to morals. He changes the letter that orders his assassination to have Rosencrantz and Guildenstern put to death. Hamlet demonstrates insincerity to save his own life and avenge his father’s death, risking alienation from his moral sense.
The capacity and organization Hamlet holds using his supporters to overcome Claudius is real because his fellow citizens love him. Claudius is aware of Hamlet’s power. It creates an atmosphere where Claudius is unable to think openly or behave hostilely towards Hamlet (Knights, 1966, p. 103). The issue is Hamlet is not able to organize his supporters as a mob because of his principle nature prohibiting him from following through (Cahn, 1996, p.101). Without this choice the only way for him to avenge his father’s death, is by him alone, taking action against Claudius. This leaves

Get Access