preview

Gunpowder Age Summary

Decent Essays

In linear warfare, armies do not fight as small groups as the centralized inventory soldiers. These soldiers tend to spread out more instead of concentrated in long horizontal riffle lines. All the inventory weapons have to be masked together in order to be powerful and increase destructive force. That explains the long lines of these weapons, thus, coining the term linear warfare. The army would advance the battle field in columns, such as matching in parallel. When they encounter enemy, they deploy into two or three lines, where a single line that has three or four sublines and fire in unison. They deploy lines from roughly 140 yards away from enemy, but the introduction of the riffle increased that distance to 300 yards. Whoever fire first would be at a disadvantage because they have to reload first, whereas the side who were second to fire could fire at full volley, and may be able to attach with the bayonet. Andrade really help put these inventions into perspective with a chronological timeline he provided in his book. The book “The Gunpowder Age: China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the West in World History” has four parts that presented the development of gunpowder and weapons. In part one of …show more content…

While the infantry drill was improved and re-developed in Europe, Tang dynasty in China established the technique of firing volley with crossbows. Ming troops acquired firearms volleys before the European did. In the book, Andrade described the first conflict that Ming and Qing militaries had with European Dutch and Russian forces. Since China had overcame in all early military conflicts, they were not caught up with two of the technologies that Europe had developed, which were ships and Renaissance fortress. These European developments worked as force multiplier for European

Get Access