Gun Restrictions Research Paper

A hot-button topic in the world of U.S. politics today is the controversy over whether or not new gun laws need to be instituted to keep Americans safe. We are a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and one that sticks to traditional values. With this, comes a great deal of incongruity, which makes for a very sensitive debate on gun control. On one side of the spectrum, we have those who take a more liberal stance; while they do in fact support the second amendment, there is no doubt that the U.S. has evolved significantly since the Constitution was written, hence creating a need for strict gun laws. On the other side of the spectrum, conservatives argue that as soon as executive action inhibits the fundamental principles in which

“The right to bear arms”, an amendment so prioritized by our founding fathers that it earned the very second spot on the list of birth rights as Americans. However, with constant tragedies striking the United States, such as massacres in public high schools and universities, mall shootings, and attempted assassinations on state representatives, it’s no wonder law makers are constantly debating the topic of gun control.

Gun control is a controversial issue for a long time around the world, particularly in U.S. because of a lots of mass shooting in school and public places. The second Amendment of the U.S. constitution is one of the shortest in all of the bill of right, it was written by the time period of American’s birth and it is the spirit of self-defense that help the new citizens of U.S. win their own freedom from the British. But now as the gun shooting problem happening every day in America, this gun control problem has gradually become to a hot issue. Compare to other countries like Britain, Canada, Japan, China, the difference between U.S. and those countries is in these countries to get a firearm is a very difficult thing

2 of the 5 deadliest mass shootings in modern American history have happened this year. The United States constitution ensures that every citizen has the right to firearms, the question at hand however is to what extent these firearms can be regulated or where should the government draw the line to ensure that the safety of American citizens is prioritized? There comes a point where sending thoughts and prayers just isn’t enough anymore. However, one thing is for certain: something must be done. Guns should be strictly regulated to reduce gun deaths, threat of mass shootings and to be completely true to the promises of the constitution.

Gun control is a law that controls how guns are sold and used, and who can own them. Allowing people to possess and use a gun with legal documents in the United States is legal. There have been arguments on whether or not is should be legal to own a gun as some people see it as beneficial and others do not. It is believed that guns are beneficial to have, and they are there because we need to be able to protect ourselves. We should not allow the government to have power over gun control for many reasons including the loss of tradition of hunting, not being able to protect ourselves, and simply because of the second amendment.

Stricter gun laws are required to reduce casualties caused by gun violence. People have right to own guns base on the 2nd amendment of the U.S constitution. According to “Background on Gun Control” 91% percent of Americans say that there should be least minor restrictions on gun ownership. However, research shown that children who died after being accidentally shot has increased from 140 in 1996 up to 259 in 2012 every year. In my opinion, the U.S government should increase stricter gun regulations on background check; mental examination and safety trainings to prevent misfiring that cause death and injuries among our friends and family.

The United States Gun laws need to be actively strengthened to protect and prevent harm against citizens by creating more thorough background checks, mental health checks, and more licenses specifically for different types of assault weapons. Several mass shootings have been caused by legally purchased guns caused by background checks without intensive research. With stricter gun laws harm and massive tragedies would be prevented or have more protection and safety. New laws and mandates would change the environment of gun safety and protection.

“If you take guns away from legal gun owners, Then the only people who would have guns would be the bad guys” (Hirsen). Most people are against gun restrictions because it's not the gun that kills people its the person behind the gun that kills the person. Even though gun restrictions have a negative effect on society, it is positive because the 2nd amendment allows yourself protection for human security. Each new mass shooting, the debate over gun control becomes more talked about.There can be gun regulation which is the background checking of people before owning a gun, but no, there shouldn't be any limitations for guns, if a criminal wants to buy a gun, too bad, they blew their chance, just because a criminal did get

Even though people want more strict gun laws, we should be able to protect ourselves because people buying guns illegally and using it for crime and not for good use. Wikipedia lets us know that weapon control is the laws that manage the

Changing the gun control laws in the United States has been a hot topic, especially with the recent tragic stories. Gun control is the set of laws that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification and use of firearms. Guns are an unsafe weapon that cannot be stopped, which is causing a big problem in the United States. Some people believe that there should be stricter gun laws and some think otherwise. Stricter gun control laws will not make the United States a safer environment.

Guns are an evil tool that can end humanity. Most people are dying due to gun violence. Individuals don’t feel safe anymore. Gun can easily be purchased. Therefore, the U.S should put more restrictions on gun ownership and use for people's safety.

Guns are extremely dangerous weapons. They can cause massive destruction, harm and even death. They can be used to protect and defend or even threaten and harm. Every or any way you look at it, guns are a dangerous and powerful tool. I believe that gun restrictions should be abolished if they want to secure the safety of the people. “The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capita number in the world. 22% of Americans own one or more guns (35% of men and 12% of women)” (Hawthorn 1).

Putting stricter gun laws in place to regulate what types of guns and ammunition citizens can buy is regulated by the Second Amendment and the National Firearms Act of 1934. The purchasing of semi-automatic weapons and automatic weapons, manufactured prior to 1986, are legal in most states (http://www.dw.com/en/8-facts-about-gun-control-in-the-us/a-40816418). However, recent events point to the government needing to regulate what types of weapons are allowed to be lawfully owned in this country. In the last 10 years, five of the deadliest shootings have occurred in the U.S. Dating back to 1949, of the 30 deadliest shootings, 18 have been within the last 10 years (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/13/health/mass-shootings-in-america-in-charts-and-graphs-trnd/index.html). The use of AR-15 rifles has become increasingly popular during mass shooting events however, semi-automatic handguns are also used (http://www.politifact.come/truth-o-meter/article/2017/nov/08/facts-mass-shootings-united-states/). Not allowing citizens to acquire certain types of weapons

Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm

Jeff Cooper, the creator of the “modern technique” of handgun shooting, an expert on the use and history of small arms, once said, “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.” People will always have possession of arms, whether they use it for harm or to protect. There is no need to add more gun control laws. Instead, rules should be strongly enforced, specific guns should be banned in certain areas, and lawmakers need to consider people’s reactions. If the laws were tighter, then it will be more difficult to buy a gun, which will help decrease shootings.