Gun Control Persuasive Essay

America needs to institute, and initiate gun control laws throughout the entire nation. But not everybody who inhabits the United States believes in regulating arms. Those who are against establishing gun laws argue that gun control directly infringes upon their “right to bear arms” granted to them by the 2nd Amendment. Anti gun control supporters, such as the National Rifle Association, often claim that the act of regulating guns is a sufficient reason why such an Amendment was introduced in the constitution; to protect themselves from any and all forms of violation of civil liberties and freedom. Supporters of anti gun laws are unwilling to welcome any interpretations of the 2nd Amendment that do not match up “word for word,” as was written in the Bill of Rights.

The Atlantic asked its readers about their first memories with guns, and one reader responded with "We lived in southwestern Colorado my first six years of life (1949-1955). My father had a double-barrel shotgun, and a single-barrel one, a .22 rifle, and a “deer rifle.” We ate more venison than beef and almost as much pheasant as chicken.... I never knew where he kept those guns; I never touched one that he didn’t offer. We only saw them when he cleaned them or packed them to go hunting. He let my older sister and me shoot one of them to feel the kick and power and hear the loudness.... When he passed away in 1981, a year after my mother had passed away, we took inventory of their estate, but we never found those guns. Perhaps he sold them or gave them away or simply kept them hidden somewhere so that no one would be able to find them and shoot someone accidentally" (Green). The issue of gun control has been an increasing cynosure in society, growing in its controversy. The polar opposite sides seem to grow further different from one another, with one side supporting and the other opposing gun control laws/actions. Those who support it tend to believe there should either be no place for the firearms in society at all or that there should be very strict restrictions on who may obtain a given firearm. Those who oppose the laws believe there should either be little to no change in current restrictions or, as the National Rifle Association (NRA) advocates, there ought to be

Every so often the media and news feeds flood with reports of a mass shooting. Families mourn. In the days that follow, calls to action can be heard, and there is a demand for change. Sometimes minor legislation passes, but in the United States extreme change is rarely seen. Other developed nations provide an opposite comparison. Following the Port Arthur shooting in Australia and the shooting in Great Britain, both countries organized for significant gun reform.

According to Nicholas Kristof’s article “our blind spot about guns” gun control is a lot like cars regulation such that if we can regulate cars we can regulate guns. It took a lot of time and effort but thanks to regulations cars are safer than they were many years ago, and the same is very possible with guns. We need to keep our country safe. The first steps to gun control are improving on background checks and also requiring trigger locks on all guns.

Did you know that in the United States almost 100,000 people are shot or killed with a gun in one year? 10,527 people die a year in handgun related incidents in the United States. This number, by far, outweighs the number of gun related deaths in countries such as Sweden, Great Britain, and Japan, which number 13, 22, and 87, respectively. What is the reason for such drastic differences in numbers? Sweden, Great Britain, and Japan are all countries that have stricter gun control laws than the US. Mind you, these are just the number of deaths caused by handgun related incidents; however, that isn’t counting the thousands of deaths caused by other types of firearms; in one year, around 30,000 Americans die in gun violence.

October, 1st 2017 has marked the latest in a now all too familiar trend of tragedies; a mass killing of civilians by a sick individual. In the wake of this tragedy, there is a mass of human emotion, grief, anger, sadness, and a demand for justice to right what has been wronged. In looking for justice, one needs an antagonist to blame, in this case an object, the gun. While it is true that firearms are the weapon of choice for many violent tragedies across the United States, will a ban on firearms truly solve the problem of violence for the country? Although a firearm ban may seem like a preventative for violence in the United States, a comparison of violent crime in other countries with varying levels of gun control, the lack of

Can you imagine waking up at three in the morning to the sound of your front door being kicked in, and police swarming in to your home, on a mission to remove all your legally obtained firearms, while ripping your house apart? I can’t, but that is what it seems like NRA activists imagine happening at the mere mention of gun control. Those two words seem to ignite the same “fight or flight” reaction as the boogie man to all my fellow gun-toting Americans. However, I believe that there is a way to bring those for and against gun control to a common ground by improving background checks, restricting gun shows, and banning semi-automatic rifles.

Is increasing gun control the answer to stopping criminal acts of gun violence? Or is there a better solution? The many recent tragic events involving gun violence have made the debate between gun control and gun rights to be at an all-time high. The most recent and deadliest example of gun violence, still fresh in peoples’ minds, occurred in Las Vegas, Nevada where 59 lives were lost, and 441 people were injured. Other recent occurrences include the San Bernardino attacks in which deadly fully automatic weapons were used, and 16 lives were taken and 19 were injured at a disability regional center. As well as all the tragic school shootings involving children. These criminal acts of gun violence are making Americans wonder and debate about

Excluding most suicides, at least 15,549 people were killed by guns in the United States in the year of 2017. (“Gun Deaths Increased in 2017, thetrace.com.) Over 15,000 people were killed in one year how many of those people would be alive today if it weren’t for guns, or how many more would be killed if it weren’t for guns. Will banning all guns result in less violence in America? Will taking away guns increase violence in America? In tackling this tough subject we will look at the Second Amendment, along with the definition of Gun Control. Also we will touch on the accessibility of guns, gun deaths compared to other tools, and America compared to other countries regarding gun deaths.

Gun control has been a highly controversial issue for the past several decades. Gun control is a very broad term, and can have many different interpretations. Some individuals believe gun control will ban the use and possession of firearms all together. Others may believe it just bans certain parts of a gun such as high capacity magazines, silencers, and flash suppressors. Both interpretations above are forms gun control. However, the true definition of gun control is “regulation of selling, owning, and using guns” (merriam-webster.com). Placing more restrictions on purchasing, owning, and using firearms is an ineffective way to end gun violence. Gun control will be ineffective because it will violate the second amendment, federal and state laws have already proven to be ineffective, and increased restrictions will not prevent mass shootings. Before getting into how gun control is ineffective, some commonly misused firearm terminology should be presented.

With all of the conclusions stated up to this point, the future in the United States does not look promising for responsible U.S. citizen gun-owners. The government does not appear to be heading towards the diminution of the strict gun control laws. With the new laws being issued and put into effect around the years of 2013-2014, all United States citizens that legally own firearms now must register all of their personally owned guns to the government. The recent date of 1 April 2014 has just passed, but this day stood the date when a long gun "eligibility certificate" is required to be issued to all citizens owning a gun that is not a handgun (General Statutes of Connecticut). The government believes that it is solving its firearm-related crime

Gun control has once again become the topic of interest and debate in the United States. A mass shooting in Las Vegas very recently sparked it back up. A man used illegal weapons to injure over 500 defenseless people in a crowd, and around 60 lost their lives in the tragedy. Legal guns in the hands of sane U.S. citizens, however, have positive effects. Providing a sense of security for families, helping to stop crimes, and empowering women are some examples of the effects of gun ownership.

October first, 2017, not even a month ago was the deadliest mass shooting in United States history. This act brought so much fear into people, people became afraid of guns and the ability to use them. The idea of gun control became very popular and commonly talked about once again. People have become convinced that gun control will cause less massacre’s, and they are convinced because of this insane amount of fear people have now. Through past killings or terrorist attacks, people always strongly hate whatever caused the killing through fear alone. After September 11, 2001, a large amount of people hated Muslims, even those inside America which were completely uninvolved, fear can takeover one’s mind quick. These “modernized monsters” are

The Choose One campaign reached audiences with a love for children or strong feelings for gun control. Increasing gun control not only protects the children of America, but ensures the safety of all citizens. Parents have logical reasons to keep their children from attending school outside the home due to the recent increase in school shootings in the recent years. The biggest campaign launched from Moms Demand Action is “Choose One”. The selected advertisements capture two young students in school settings, one holding a meaningless, yet banned object, such as a children’s book, a dodge ball, or a Kinder egg, which surprisingly is allowed in schools. In efforts to reduce the harmful effects of gun violence, “Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America was created to demand action from legislators, state, and federal; companies; and educational institutions establish common-sense gun reforms.” () The group came together through Shannon Watts, after she experienced strong emotions resulting from the tragedies of the Sandy Hook massacre. Moms Demand Action has proven successful through their expansion of chapters, establishing one in every state. It is important to note that the members of this group support the second amendment, but these members feel that action should be taken to enforce the control of gun usage for the general safety of all Americans. The desired response of the advertisement is the feeling of astonishment, as it shows how schools ban the smallest

There has been much controversy about the issue of gun controls. Many different laws about gun control have been put in place. While some argue that there are too many gun restricting laws, others people say otherwise. Due to the increase of deaths each year because of guns, some of the laws associated with gun ownership that have been removed, need to be reexamined .