The basic process of interpersonal relationships and communicative interactions with
others is based primarily on emotions. In the film "Good Will Hunting", the characters
experience many emotions that impact their interpersonal relationships and communicative
interactions. Taking into consideration that each character grew up with a different lifestyle,
their interpersonal relationships and communicative interactions are affected in their
continuing years. The film allows us to see different personalities in each character and how
their emotions affect how they communicate.
Characters in the movie Good Will Hunting express a great deal of nonverbal
communication. It is one of the key aspects of communication. The
…show more content…
The concept of listening responses plays a substantial role in the film. Will and his
therapist both reflect a listening response to one another through evaluation. Will's therapist,
Sean Maguire, evaluates Will constructively. Sean and Will share that they were both victims of
child abuse, and Sean helps Will to realize that the abuse he suffered was not his fault. During
his therapy sessions, within time, Will evaluates his relationships with the people he is close
with and is able to confront his emotional issues and make decisions about his future.
Characters in this film illustrate how important different listening responses correlate with
emotions.
Emotional fallacies are good examples of how emotions can impact interpersonal
relationships and communicative interactions with others. In the film, Will has constant
irrational thinking and debilitative emotions. Fallacy of helplessness shows how Will is not
determined to find his satisfaction in life. As a result of his child abuse, Will continuously tries to
find excuses for what happened in his past, avoiding any confrontation having to do anything
about it. In the film, Will feels helpless, so he pushes his emotions aside for others to deal with.
Will also illustrates a fallacy of catastrophic expectations. Will consistently experiences
rumination. The consistent reoccurring thoughts of the trauma from his
Throughout the film, many stories are told by different characters that are involved in the story. There are
Good Will Hunting is a story about a young man who struggles to find his true identity. Mr. Hunting is a 21 year old Caucasian young man and who grew up in South Boston, Massachusetts and works as a janitor at MIT and as a construction worker. He lives in the slums and always spends his nights at bars with his best friends. He is afraid to step out into the world and never had a chance to explore life or to use his gift due to being abused as a child. The experiences from his birth to childhood negatively affect emotionally and socially that he becomes very defensive and afraid to be rejected from others.
The movie Good Will Hunting an American Drama Film was directed by Gus Van Sant, and starring Robin Williams, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Minnie Driver and Stellan Skarsgard in 1997. This movie is about a man named Good Will Hunting who was a genius but chose not to live as a genius because of fear of past experiences and the ill treatment he received when he was in foster home. Some of the other characters in the movie were supportive and some were not supportive of him. This essay discusses Good Will’s personality traits and his interaction with the other characters in the movie. Good Will Hunting possessed the following personality traits, namely: independence, intense interest in a problem, and the need for stimulation.
Will uses anger, denial, and sarcasm as defense mechanisms to push people away from him. He told people that he did not have a problem and that they were the ones with the problem. He used
His presenting self was the safeguard to his private self. Will was very much aware of his gift and his enormous potential but shunned it like some burden, or at least that's what he wanted others to believe. He often told Sean Maguire, his shrink with whom he had developed a bond, that his gift was something he didn't ask for, and he'd be perfectly fine working an honorable blue-collar job with his buddies. Despite his assertion regarding his gift as an aggravation Will's actions contradict, for he is asked why he just so happened to get a custodial job in the world's foremost institute for technology, M.I.T if he wanted nothing to do with his genius. Maguire sees behind Will's visage, he realizes Will is a wounded soul who really knows nothing about life for he hasn't experienced it, it is so much more that what he read in a book. It is hard to say what Will should have done for he had a difficult past one that most cannot relate too, or have any idea what it may be like to live it. However, If Will had been a little more open to the people who wanted to love him he would have been much happier. In his quest to never be hurt he was headed for a life where he would never be loved. His thoughts were becoming a self-fulfilling prophesy; where one's expectations of an event make that event more likely to occur (Adler, 65). Had Will been honest with himself and more willing
Just like you did” (210, Reynolds). This is important because Will is going to follow the rules and kill him. It also shows that he is kind of looking up to his father in a way because he is talking to him and is stepping up as a man and maturing in the community like his dad did and killed the killer. That shows how Will experienced loss and matured from what
developing a mind and will of his own. He is no longer unperceptively loyal to his father.
At the beginning of the story, Will is nonempathetic because all he wants to do is kill the man who killed his brother, he wants revenge. However, on the elevator ride, Will experiences meeting people who died because of a gun which causes him to be more cautious about revenge and who he might kill. Later in the story, Will becomes more aware of others and learns that he is not a person who kills people. The person who helped him the most was his dad, who did two things to help him realize the severity of his situation. The first thing is that his dad tells him how he shot the wrong guy.
Good Will Hunting is the graceful tale of a young gentleman’s struggle to find out where he belongs in the world, by first finding out who he himself is. In this film, Matt Damon takes on the role of a disturbed genius that has a keen understanding of the deepness of human character. The film is a voyage through the mind of Will Hunting as he is required to undergo psychotherapy as an alternative to serving jail time. With the assistance of a psychologist, played by Robin Williams, Will learns about himself and recognizes his individual worth in the world by comprehending what is most important to him in his own life. This motion picture serves as a source of superb example for film technique. Gus Van Sant’s directing ability joined with
Will was a young man who was involved in business. He also was a extreme sports enthusiast. Until he got hit by a motorcycle while he was crossing a road. That event happened two years ago. He almost was almost fully paralyzed. Will's mom tells Lou to monitor him at all hours of the day. Even though he already has professional medical care needs. But will is a jerk to Lou at first. But he eventually warms up to her.
After a difficult start, Sean concludes that Will's defensiveness is the result of years of physical and emotional abuse, (as well as intense isolation), and that his hostile, sarcastic, and evasive behaviors are all defense mechanisms. The two work together to break through Will's considerable barriers, using a certain type of psychotherapy, and to get at the heart of the problem, dealing with Will's complex emotions. The two begin to relate to each other more, with Sean telling Will about his past and his happiness with his now
One of the most meaningful aspects of the movie that contributes to its memorability and poignancy is the way in which the characters speak, particularly around different groups of people. For instance, Will is clearly well-read and has a near-photographic memory, so there he several sections of the film in which he rips apart his competition verbally, such as the famous "How do you like them apples?" scene, or his chilling response to "Why shouldn't I work
Good Will Hunting is a good example of how someone with psychological disorders can overcome their issues through therapy. This is a classic film that was released in 1997. It was directed by Gus Van Sant, and written by Ben Affleck and Matt Damon. The key actors of this movie include Matt Damon, Robin Williams, Ben Affleck, Minnie Driver and Stellan Skarsgård, with Damon being the main character, Will. In the movie Good Will Hunting, director Gus Van Sant shows that Will suffers from psychological disorders through the use of the characters of Will and Sean, as well as the film’s color selections, and angles and shots.
An Analysis of the Movie ?Good Will Hunting? and the Main Characters Will Hunting and Sean Mcguire
The movie, Good Will Hunting (1997), is about a young twenty-year-old man named Will Hunting. Will Hunting lives in a rather impoverished area in South Boston and is a young janitor who typically drinks with his friends in his free time, however, Will is actually an indiscreet self-taught genius. During the first week of classes at MIT, Will solves a difficult graduate-level math problem that one of the math professors left an extremely difficult problem on the board to challenge his students, in hopes that someone would solve it by the end of the semester (Van Sant, 1997). However, Will solves the problem but does not want to let anyone know that it was him that solved the difficult equation, therefore it came to everyone’s surprise when they discovered it was actually Will who solved the problem in such a short matter of time, indicating his hidden intellect (Van Sant, 1997). Outside of work, Will got into an argument with a group of boys who previously tried to bully him (Van Sant, 1997). Because of this incident, Will was arrested after hitting the officer who responded to the fight (Van Sant, 1997). Throughout Will’s trial, the math professor who initially wrote the problem on the board, began intervening with his trial, after realizing Will’s potential when he notices Will’s intellect in defending himself (Van Sant, 1997). The professor arranges a deal with the court and Will was offered a choice, he could either go to jail, or he could be released into the professor’s