Health care can be an extremely sensitive topic, as many people have reservations over what treatments work and do not work. One treatment that has spark debate is the effectiveness of flu vaccinations, and the possible outcomes, especially for the elderly. In the Case Study “Healthcare Obligations: Personal vs. Institutional,” Dr. Jones faces several moral and ethical issues concerning flu vaccinations. One of the main issues concerns informing patients about the relative effectiveness of the vaccine and whether or not they should get it. According to the British CDC, the rate of effectiveness for flu shots were less than a quarter and that they offered no significant protection. There is also blood test that could assess whether the flu …show more content…
As a physician, it is her job to keep her patients well informed about the procedures they receive and the potential effects that it may or may not have. However, after becoming aware of the case, Dr. Jones has become wary of administering flu shots, especially to the elderly, and has been forced by the hospital have one done herself or she would lose her job. The main issue she faces is either following her moral compass or doing what the hospital tells her to do. As her ideologies do not quite align with the hospital, her best option would be to leave the workplace and look for another job; however, she may not be likely to do that as it can be difficult to acquire employment. If she chooses to stay and follow her morals by not getting a flu shot and fully informing the patients about the dangers she read in the study, it could negatively impact her as the administration will more than likely fire her. Furthermore, the American Medical Association may take note of this and may make it harder for Dr. Jones to find new employment. However, it she does as the hospital says, and does not fully inform her patients about the flu shot, she could potentially jeopardize his or her health. In Dr. Jones’ case, she may rationalize that as the patient’s doctor, she knows what best for them and provide them with the information, but to the extent to where they are still likely to take it. Also, as most institutions mandate vaccinations, she must get the vaccine herself in order to stay
Will enforcing staff to comply with yearly flu vaccinations, and increasing patient education about the flu vaccination increase compliance in high-risk patients in health care facilities?
To get the flu vaccine or not to get the flu vaccine? This is a huge controversial question millions of Americans today ask themselves every year. There are many myths that come along with the topic of the flu vaccine that lead to people questioning the effectiveness of the medication. Safety for our families and loved ones is what we aim to achieve, but what are the pros and cons of this vaccine? What are the consequences and what are myths, but most importantly: what are the reasons we should get it in the first place? In this paper you will learn the many reasons for the flu vaccination and how it affects different populations beginning with children all the way to the elderly population. First of all, what is the flu
Doctors have a difficult job because they are expected to give in all of their effort in order to save each one of their patients. Before a vaccine has been approved for use Dr. Ally Hextall gave herself the vaccine to prove that it worked. It would have been wrong for her to have used it on other people before knowing if the vaccine was actually effective. I think she was just doing her job by checking for effectiveness of the vaccine, and she was just being protective of her community. People could argue and imply that she used the vaccine to her benefit, but I don’t think that could have happened. Due to her not knowing if the vaccine would be able to help combat the virus. Dr. Ally Hextall was exposing herself out to become infected by
Although the family has requested that the doctor lie to the patient and tell him they are giving him a shot to “boost his immune system”, the doctor is held to a higher standard and is therefore responsible for any negative consequences
Why do families refuse to receive the yearly flu shot when it is easy to access and keeps them healthy? Influenza, or the flu, is a critical illness that can lead up to hospitality or even death depending on the person's immune system (F). It is said that the first tracing of the flu was from the ancient Greek philosopher and physician Hippocrates (D). It is recommended by the CCD that anyone ages 6 months and older should receive the flu shot for protection against influenza (D). Despite opposition by anti-vaccine families, the flu vaccines should be mandatory because it helps prevent people from being sick, the shot does not allow people to give the flu to others as easily, and the flu vaccine is the fastest way to get rid of influenza.
Referring to question 2, it is unfortunate that the son of the elderly client were non-compliant in taking the flu shot despite teaching. However, people sometime are negative or dismiss information that has been given to them, because of barriers. Barriers such as reading and writing can be a major obstacle in teaching a person who cannot read or write. Therefore, it is important as nurses not only to assess the health status of an individual; we should also assess their knowledge and understanding to know how much they know about the diseases/treatment. Beagley (2011), believes that “assessing and evaluating the learning needs of the patient are essential before planning and implementation of an educational plan” (p. 331). The US department
In conclusion, healthcare workers should have to receive a mandatory influenza vaccine to ensure a safe environment for patients to be treated. The worker’s rights are not violated
There is no reliable, high-quality evidence showing that vaccinating every health-care worker greatly reduces flu cases and deaths. In the absence of evidence based support, the influenza prevention has become an industry that health officials manipulate and misrepresent. Additionally, flu shot as an invasive medical treatment carries risks of injury and death, and is by far the most danger vaccination. Canadian Medical Law states that forcing a medical procedure on a person against their will violates the Informed Consent ethic, is fraudulent and constitutes a “battery” against that person[7] Therefore, those against forced flu vaccination strongly believe that it is their fundamental human right not to be subjected to medical interventions without fully informed consent when receiving invasive medical treatments (including vaccines). They state that the policy was an abuse of the privacy rights of health-care
Health care governments have endorsed an assortment of vaccination policies and mediations to safeguard against the known dangers of influenza communication, with longer patient stays, absenteeism, intermissions in health care, and death. Studies assessing the consequence of health care workers vaccination found that health care workers influenza vaccination was linked with a decrease in patient death (Murana, 2014). Assessing the results of health care worker influenza vaccination on patient results anticipated that if all health care workers were vaccinated, patient influenza infections could be stopped.
Vaccinations have been a topic of controversy among various populations for decades. The controversy exists around the decision to be vaccinated for certain contagious diseases or to omit receiving vaccinations for various reasons including those of medical, ethical, and religious derivation. The profession of healthcare faces a particular obstacle in regard to annual vaccinations against influenza. This review will discuss the following ethical debate: Is it ethical to mandate health care workers to receive annual influenza vaccinations? For the purposes of this review, the term ‘health care worker’ will be defined as any person who is employed by a health care institution and participates in personal interactions with patients. Undoubtedly, registered nurses (RNs) are among the most prevalent of all health care workers. This topic was chosen because influenza is a rampant and contagious respiratory virus that carries the potential to infect anyone. According the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (2014), approximately 5 to 15 percent of the United States population becomes infected with influenza annually and roughly 200,000 people are hospitalized each year due to influenza. Clearly, influenza generates havoc for many people; however, the virus can be largely prevented by receiving an annual vaccination. Annual influenza vaccinations have been rendered the best way to prevent seasonal influenza and have also been deemed safe (CDC, 2014). Health care workers
In recent years encouragement to get flu shots has become a yearly mantra. Elderly, children six months to two years, health care workers and immune-deficient people are urged in the strongest terms to go to their doctors or clinics and get a flu shot. This group encompasses about 98 million people. In the fall of 2004 this was in the forefront of American and to some extent the Western World media with the shortage of this flu seasons vaccine. Current medical wisdom states that flu shots are safe, effective and prevent mortality. A recent study published by The Journal of the American Medicine Association (JAMA) has brought the current wisdom into question. On February 14, 2005 JAMA
Ethically we must also respect and support each other as co-workers and protect each other from being infected by the flu. It is shown that when influenza vaccination is mandatory, many workers will choose not to get the vaccine because healthcare workers feel that they are not being given the choice to opt out of not having to get either vaccinated and must wear a mask. Nevertheless, if influenza is not mandatory many healthcare workers tend to get the vaccination, as all healthcare workers have one goal and that the protection of our other fellow workers as well as
Mandatory Influenza Vaccinations for healthcare providers can be a controversial topic for some and may propose a challenge to some provider’s ethical values and beliefs. The topic of mandatory vaccination for influenza (“flu”) has been widely studied and debated among professionals over several years. It is apparent that there is some movement towards a mandatory vaccination for influenza by healthcare institutions as the benefit out weighs the risk on several fronts. “Influenza infection is associated with 36,000 excess deaths and > 200,000 hospitalizations in the United States annually. It is the leading cause of vaccine-preventable death in the United States every year” (Babcock, Geminhart, Jones, Dunagan, & Woeltje, 2010, p. 459).
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this narrative review is to discuss what influenza is? And what the ethical and morality of flu vaccinations. This discussion is grounded whether or not flu vaccinations are necessary for individuals.
Everyone in the United States who is not apart of a religious group--in which vaccination will infringe upon their beliefs--should receive vaccinations to ensure the safety of American citizens. For instance, when one schedules an annual physical, he/she may immediately think of vaccines. Young children may whine and teenagers may gripe. “Do I really need a shot mom?” One grumpy teenager or child might ask. The mother, in a typical setting, will say yes. The parent will not reply yes because they wish to hear his/her child complain about a sore arm for the next three days; no, the parent allows the nurse to administer the shot because the vaccine is recommended. In fact, vaccines have been a proven and effective way to protect the human race against diseases. With the intention of preventing diseases, listening to recommendation by qualified physicians and nurses could mean the difference between life and death for other children.