Excessive force is the use of force greater than that which a reasonable and prudent law enforcement officer would use under the circumstances is generally considered to be excessive. (Legal) In other words for that exceeds the reasonable level of force that is necessary for the situation that the officer is in. An example of excessive force is a police officer pulling over a vehicle and commanding the driver to get out. But as the driver is getting out the police begins to grab and throws the driver against the vehicle with force. In this case all the officer had to do was do a verbal command and not have escalated the situation with using force. Furthermore, another example of excessive force is an officer who , “ used excessive force on
The use of force is inevitable in police work. In many situations the lives of o cers or civilians can be taken by not using force when necessary or using it improperly. Many factors come into play when an o cer decides to use force. ese include: is the use of force justi ed, has the o cer been properly trained to use force, and will the department be held liable if the force is used improperly?
Excessive or reasonable force by police? Research on law enforcement and racial conflict a research conducted by John Wihbey and Leighton Walter Kille. The main logic behind this research was a result of continuous Allegations of the U.S. police officers and law enforcement agencies using excessive force while on the job for the past two decades. The writers of the research begun by stating the most recent police brutality cases starting from Eric Garner who died as a result of a “chokehold” by an officer, A month later the fatal shooting of Michael Brown by officer Darren Wilson, Tamir Rice who was shot by police in Cleveland, Ohio, Walter L. Scott was shot by a police officer during a routine traffic stop, and Freddie Gray who died while
It’s hard to determine if an officer is actually using excessive force simply because there is not a national standard to what excessive force it. To prevent the use of excessive force, the system needs to first establish the
The line between required force and excessive force is blurry. There is no real fine definition of excessive force. The decision is different from case to case. Thus creating more controversy on the situation because the population is making the choice between police brutality or necessary force for himself or herself. The choice should be based off the
To be clear, using excessive force is wrong. No one should have the thought about just beating someone up for the fun of it. But if the situation calls for force to protect me or anyone else, then a police officer should use all means necessary to stop the situation. The most common ways that police use force at their
According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police they describe the use of force as the "amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by an unwilling
Use of Force Essay – Police Powers Laura Mackasey It seems as though the world today has focused itself, for the time being, on police and those in other forms of authority and their supposed excessive use of force. In the media today, whether it be social media or more traditional forms of media, the phrase “use of force” is used by many who do not truly understand its definition. Although Wikipedia is not a scholarly source, the general public often looks to it for answers to their questions. If an individual were to look up the definition of use of force by Wikipedia the answer would be as follows: “The use of force involves the use of physical restraint – usually by a member of a law enforcement agency - to gain control of an unruly person or
Excessive force, here is a startling fact. CNN made this report on African-American Eric Garner and his encounter with police and his moments of death. Police tried to arrest Garner, a father of six, in front of a store for allegedly selling cigarettes. Garner raised both hands in the air and asked officers not to shoot him. Seconds later, Officer Daniel Pantaleo grabbed the 350-pound Garner in a chokehold, pulling him to the sidewalk and rolling him onto his stomach. The New York Police Department prohibits the use of chokeholds.
The use of force protocol authorizes the use of force in situations where force is appropriate and reasonable to affect a lawful arrest, to protect the person of the arresting officer or to protect the person of an innocent third party or officer. The purpose of a policy on use of force is to establish general guidelines for the escalation and de-escalation of force and to establish procedures for reporting use of force. This is to ensure the department has set guidelines for deputies put in different situations that requires a type of force. The use of physical force should be restricted to circumstances authorized by law and to the degree minimally necessary to accomplish a lawful police task (Mollenhauer, M. F. 2007). The issue with the use of force in policing is the procedure is not clear and can be personalized per each situation.
There may be circumstances when no matter how much an individual officer may believe the force he applied was reasonable and just, the powers to be at that particular agency may deem it excessive. If an officer goes out every day with common sense and good moral character and does what he believes is right, sometimes these things happen.
Whenever a law enforcement officer places an individual under arrest or is involved in a deadly force scenario the officer has used some degree of force. The incidents where an office has to make a split second decision and use physical force to control a situation is known as “Use of Force.” The use of force varies as situations present themselves to the officer and they must decide what level of force is necessary to control the situation. Often the use of force is subject to much debate and not a year goes by without some media coverage of some law enforcement officer accused of using excessive force. In dozens of studies of police use of force there is no single,
When explaining “how much” use of force is needed, it all comes down to the situation the officer or officers are facing. When applying for a targeted person, use of force may be defined either excessive or justified. When applying use of force to a target, unpredictable events may turn drastic, time is scarce and only seconds are available to determine proper response, thus doing what is necessary in the heat of the moment. Nonetheless, there has been open and obvious use of excessive force in American policing.
The use of excessive force is the application of force beyond what is reasonably believed to be necessary to gain compliance from a subject in any given incident. For example, if a Transportation Security Officer body slams a passenger to the ground for not stepping to the side, this too would be considered using excessive
careers when use of force is appropriate—for example, in making some arrests, restraining unruly combatants, or controlling a disruptive demonstration. When the level of force exceeds the level considered justifiable under the circumstances, however, the activities of the police come under public scrutiny (Adams, 1999).
There have been innumerable accounts of excessive use of force in America. The law has changed after certain cases Graham v. Connor 1989. A diabetic man named Graham, believed an insulin reaction forthcoming and he rushed to the store with a friend to get some orange juice. The store was too crowded, he decided to go to another friend's house. Unbeknownst to Graham, he was being watched by an officer named Connor. The officer stopped Graham and his friend and called for backup. Numerous officers arrived at the scene, Graham was handcuffed. Officer Connor was under the impression that Graham had committed a