Essay On Animal Testing For Animals

For a long time, animals have been used in many scientists’ experiments for cosmetics, chemicals, researches, and medications. It is very unfair for laboratory animals because there is no law to protect them from

Rabbits, rats and rodents, what do they all have in common? Sure, they all start with the letter ‘R’, they’re all little furry animals that people may have as pets but more importantly they are the subject of animal testing. These animals along with many others, including cats, fish, dogs and monkeys, are all used in science labs for cruel experimentation. Millions of animals are burned, poisoned and at worst, killed, in unnecessary testing each year for the sake of cosmetics, toiletries and household products.

The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only federal law that gives protection to warm -blooded animals in research laboratories. Under this law, it is the researchers’ job to make sure that they provide these animals pain relievers, provide them with the best veterinary care, housing, and food. This law only protects ten percent of the lab animals. The rest of the ninety percent of animals in labs aren’t protected: rats, mice and birds. This means legally the researchers do not have to provide these unprotected lab animals with decent care at all. Researchers can choose to treat these unprotected animals however they want and with as many rats, mice and birds as they please. Knowing how unfair the Welfare Act is towards the many lab animals it should be protecting, the voters should inform and show concern to their legislators in order to stop the mistreatment of these animals. The Animal Welfare Act should protect all animals being tested in research laboratories.

practice in the world, According the Animal Welfare Act, animals such as rats, mice, fish

The project, the individual and the institution must all have spate licences from the home office if animals are to be used in research. The institutional Licence application is very important as there are many things to take into account. The institution must show that any animal used or intended for use in a procedure shall be provided with accommodation and an environment with at least a small amount of freedom for movement, food, water and care to keep it healthy. ASPA details minimum requirements for this to ensure animals are not put under any unnecessary stress or harm. Although some researchers may say this is not absolutely necessary, it is in fact in their best interest to keep animals as healthy as possible as it will improve the reliability of any results that come from the procedures performed (Home Office,

It is estimated that each year in the United States, twenty six million animals are hurt and killed due to the testing of household products, cosmetics and scientific research. Animals like dogs, cats, mice, monkeys, rats, ferrets and hamsters experience

Every year, more than 100 million animals are poisoned, crippled, burned, or abused in United States labs alone. The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was passed in 1966 and is the only federal law in the U.S. today that regulates animal treatment in research. That being said, the AWA is not heavily enforced. Additional, the regulations it includes are extremely minimal and do not protect any type of reptiles, amphibians, rats, mice, or birds, meaning that more than ninety percent of the animals being tested on are still submitted to painful and torturous tests. These tests often result in a lifetime of pain and damage because after the tests, the animals are placed back in their cages without any medical treatment and are often used in further

Most of the animals use in research are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. Those animals like birds and mice are not protected because for the federal law, these animals are not in the animal category. The worst part of this is that those animals that are not protected are the ones most often used for testing. This animals are tortured in many ways and law does not do anything to protect them. In fact, even the animals that are protected by the AWA are harmed. They are exposed to a lot of harmful procedures. It have been cases were the same animals harm their selves due to all the stress they have to pass by. Imagine how much stress one need to be to be able to cause pain to itself.

History---- An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC.In the 1940s, Jonas Salk used rhesus monkey to cross-contamination studies to isolate the three forms of the polio virus that affected hundreds of thousands yearly.Salk's team created a vaccine against the strains of polio in cell cultures of rhesus monkey kidney cells. The vaccine was made

“Animals undergoing testing can be subjected to torture and suffering” (Humanity, 2017, p. 1). Some animals may be cured of their ailments and diseases, but not all. In some cases, the animal dies do to the treatment. Humane treatment of the animals is a valid concern, so the use of them in experiments has been greatly regulated. “This has led to the 3Rs campaign, which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use products” (Hajar, 2011, p. 1). The Animal Welfare Act was signed to protect certain animals from cruel treatment, but the animals chosen for testing aren’t covered by this act. Many people believe that animal testing is unethical since animals are

The Animal Welfare Act is the only U.S. federal law that covers animals used in research (NEAVS n.d.). The act only protects some of the animals used in research (NEAVS n.d.). The AWA doesn’t cover the animals that make up 90% of the animals used in research, including; rats, mice and birds (NEAVS n.d.). It also doesn’t cover cold-blooded animals like, fish, reptiles, and ambitions (NEAVS n.d.). The AWA sets low standards for the environment and housing these animals live in, when they are fed and what they are fed and what kind of care they receive from a vet (NEAVS n.d.). It is unknown how many animals are actually being tested on in the U.S. since the most common animals are not covered by the act, but a guess from NEAVS is over 100 million

federal law that covers animals in research” (Laws and Regulations | Animal Use in Research). What protection does this provide for animals in use for research purposes? This Act provides the minimum standards by which the animals must be housed, fed, handled and attended to health wise. The Act further minimizes and limits its protection to only a number of species of which includes dogs, chimpanzees, cats and other warm-blooded animals. Some of the species that are not protected from this act include rats, mice and birds as well as many cold-blooded animals. One of the animals that I hear a lot about, as far as testing goes, is mice. Mice are used in a lot of testing ranging from cancer research, in an attempt to find new drugs, all the way to research in diabetes. The mice provide useful models for a wide range of human diseases and are not protected under the Animal Welfare Act so the treatment of these types of animals is unregulated. Some people may say that they are just mice, but they are still animals and experience pain and symptoms just like any other animal even though they are a pest. The reason mice make good test subjects for pharmaceutical companies is because of how similar the biological and genetic characteristics are to a human thus allowing for comparative testing. If this “compound” was found to have this effect on mice, then it would have a similar effect on humans and so on. The amount of

According to Animal Testing- ProCon, since 1966, research animals have been protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). They provide minimum housing standards like enclosures, temperature, clean water and food, and more. Inspections by veterinarians are required by the Animal Welfare Act to maintain animal health (Animal Testing-ProCon, 2017). Animal Testing-ProCon also says that to use animals for research, it has to be approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Who enforce humane treatment for the research animals (Animal Testing-ProCon,

25 million mice, alone out of 100 million animals, are used for testing annually. Animal testing is extremely harmful to different types of species. The Animal Welfare Act is a helpful way to begin to stop the testing. This act was signed as a federal law in 1966, this does not cover every animal used for different activities like farm animals used for fiber or for food and more (“Welfare”, 2017). Animals should not be used for human purposes. Animal Testing should be banned because this is a gigantic problem, animals become harmed in the worst way possible, and there are different ways to stop animal testing like donating to charities.

The author states that biologically, animals and people are very different. Additionally, “the biological differences between humans and animals make it possible for a chemical or substance to be both safe for animals yet toxic to humans” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). There is the legal aspect of the topic to consider also. Many people think that the Animal Welfare Act legally protects animals and that they often are not harmed during testing. But, the author’s thoughts may suggest otherwise. The Animal Welfare Act protects pets like dogs and cats, however it provides no protection for birds, mice, and rats. These birds, mice, and rats “make up more than 90 percent of all laboratory animals” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). To not be covered by this Animal Welfare Act means that they legally “are subjected to painful medical procedures and conditions without anesthesia or other forms of pain relief” (Miley, “Cons Against Animal Testing”). This author’s ideas directly conflicts with the ideas in my first source.