Employee engagement is a method designed to ensure that employee are committed to their goals and value, motivated to contribute to business success. According to Schaufeli and Saklanova (2007), employee engagement is “important” for business organization given many challenges they face. Additionally, Sulliman (2000) claims employee engagement is essential concept for leadership and organization performance. However, it is probably difficult to get high employee engagement to organization goals. This essay will discuss whether business organization needs employee engagement to enhance business performance.
First of all, Dernovsek (2008) defines an engaged employee that get involved with and show enthusiasm for work. A research by The
…show more content…
Secondly, the research is by a Havard Business Review Analytic Service that features in depth interview with 12 company leaders and 550 executives around employee engagement. As the result, 71% of respondents agreed that employee engagement is master key to the overall success of the organization. In the research, most leaders understand the importance of engagement but most of employees are not highly engaged in their organization. According to Bates (2004), it is necessary to recognise that employee engagement is on the decline and there is a strongly disengagement among employees today. For example, a half of Americans in the workplace are not strongly engaged or they are disengaged to the business in order that U.S businesses lost $300 billion per year in productivity (Bates, 2004).
Additionally, there are various factors that impact on employee engagement included leadership, team and co-worker relationship and working environment. However, this essay will focus three factors above because they have strongly impact on employee engagement (Anitha J., 2014). Leadership is a fundamental factor that informs employee engagement that occurs when leaders are inspiring by working. Furthermore, Leaders also have responsibility for communicate with employees that their effort play main role in employee performance. When
One of the primary factors in employee engagement is a person’s relationship with his or her direct manager. Some managers are excellent at managing teams and making each person feel valued, while others don’t have the same abilities. Train your managers in the skills that can improve employee engagement, and it can boost your organization’s overall results. Most employees fear their supervisors, so they choose to leave because they don’t want to work in a stressful environment. However, they don’t always express their
Employee Engagement: It’s a known perception that an engaged workforce provides many intangible benefits that is linked directly to retention. HR policies should focus on employee engagement initiatives that stimulate motivation levels of employees to perform better and bond with organisation. This process should be initiated right from induction and continue throughout their tenure by opening channels of continuous communication and encouraging interpersonal relations. HR is responsible to incorporate methods to measure engagement and at regular intervals track engagement contribution to company’s success.
The CIPD (2014) factsheet states that Employee Engagement is a concept that ‘is generally seen as an internal state of being – physical, mental and emotional – that brings together earlier concepts of work effort, organisational commitment, job satisfaction and ‘flow’ (or optimal experience)’. An engaged workforce willingly demonstrates discretionary effort within their roles; their goals and values reflect that of their employers/organisation; they express a passion for work, feel valued and that their work has meaning.
Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organisation which profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform at work. Thus engagement is distinctively different from employee satisfaction, motivation and organisational culture.
Employee engagement has been a trend of management since 2004.(CMI 2015) ‘Some people may believe that engagement is just about employees ‘going the extra mile’, but it is much more.’(CMI 2014) Within globalization, how to apply employee engagement is significant for an organization to achieve their performance. A key aspect of employee engagement concerns how employees manage their position, performance and development in relationship to the company’s strategies. Therefore, according to Moenguc (2013), employee engagement has been personalized as a“persistent, positive affective-motivational state of fulfillment.” To demonstrate how this process affects the overall performance of an organization, John Lewis has been selected as the case study
1.2 Analyse the three principle dimensions of employee engagement (the emotional, the cognitive and the physical)
Employee engagement is a branch of public relations maintained between the manager and the employees. It is an integral part of a successful business organization. According to Kruse (2012) the employee engagement can be defined as, “The emotional commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals.” There is a distinction between the employee being happy and the employee actually being engaged in his or her work. According to Kruse (2012), a research from Towers
Companies that have higher levels of engaged employees have higher earnings per share (EPS) than companies that have lower engagement levels (Kelleher, 2011). Engaged employees are more productive, have higher levels of customer loyalty and help their employers become more profitable. An engaged employee is less likely to leave their current position. This saves their company money because there is no need to spend money to hire and train new personal. These saving can be passed along to the employees for increased wages, bonuses, and benefits. All of these items help in motivating employees, to attempt to engage the disengaged.
Wefald, A. J. & Downey, R. G. (2009). Job engagement in organizations: fad, fashion, or folderol? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 141-145.
According to Aon Hewitt (2012), employee engagement refers to the “state of emotional and intellectual involvement that motivates employees to do their best work through examination of employees’ level of engagement relative to the organisation’s
Better goods, services, technology, and tactics are several things that make one business more successful than the other. In addition, to have a competitive advantage, employee engagement is more essential than ever to the success of a business. Research has also shown that when it comes to employees, the ones who are engaged outperform considerably higher than employees not engaged. The individual correlation between the employee and their leader is important. Employee engagement is guided by the actions of their leader. The leader is responsible for creating an environment in which the employees remain engaged. There are five skills that are crucial for a good leader to possess to successfully increase engagement. They are building trust, mentoring, inclusion, alignment, and team development.
Employee engagement is a concept whereby an employee feels an emotional attachment to their employers and the goals and values the employer holds. There doesn’t appear to be a definitive description of employee engagement, but most agree that the emotional attachment is a key element to being an engaged employee. “The term employee engagement has gained considerable popularity in the past 20 years yet it remains inconsistently defined and conceptualized”, Shuck B & Wollard K (2010) - Human Resource Development Review. This emotional attachment could be described as a passion for the organisation and their part in it and a feeling that they can make a difference.
Our in-depth research has further solidified what was already speculated: employee engagement is a popular phenomenon in the corporate world with employers taking particular interest in its impact on business. Dale Carnegie Training has revealed that annually $11 billion is lost due to employee turnover rates while conversely companies that have engaged employees outperform others by 202%. Lost money is lost revenue and thus a huge concern for businesses that are losing both profits and employees. This is only one of many ways in which employee engagement has an influential impact on business. According to Aon Hewitt’s 2013 Global Tends Engagement Report, 6 out of 10
Culture and employee engagement has been one of the most debatable topics in the current years around the business world. Organization culture, which can be defined as “the way that the values and actions of managers and employees create a unique business environment,” plays a significant role in shaping the path of the company (Dizik, 2016). It is a key affecting almost every aspect of the business including employee engagement. The values, goals, and norms that the corporate culture exhibit can be reflected on the level of employee involvement and enthusiasm for work either positively or adversely. Organizations tend to address its culture and employee engagement strategically and financially. Even though these two areas promise to impose positive results on the business if addressed effectively, some companies may fail to do so.
The purpose of this study was to study the level of employee engagement and strategies practiced to engage the employees and recommend the measures that improves the employee engagement in the organization.