Early voting statistics in presidential elections provide us with demographic data that helps us understand the characteristics and situations of the citizens who are most likely to take advantage of early voting. After watching the video “Rachel Maddow – GOP targets Democratic turnout with war on early voting,” one can become very interested in the concept that African Americans, minorities, and Democrats makeup the majority of voters who take advantage of this system of early voting.
With the GOP targeting changes in the periods of early-voting sessions, we can see a correlated effect on a demographic population who favor this option. The time changes target evenings and Sundays when Democratic voters tend to vote. Democratic voters
…show more content…
When African Americans, minorities, and democrats decide to vote, they are thinking not only about candidates and issues, but how to get to the polls, whether they have time to go, and who will watch their kids while they’re gone. These cost all include lost pay, childcare, and transportation fees. These factors all tend to be higher for minorities and the poor. It only makes sense that this particular group of people are among the largest beneficiaries of early voting. These characteristics stem from deep-rooted inequalities that white, majority, republicans aren’t facing. These inequalities resulting in non-salaried jobs, where paid time off for travel is an unlikely option for voting on Election Day during business hours. Racial difference in both the prevalence of single-headed families and poverty create difficult choices for minority parents wishing to cast an in-person ballot. Choices about arranging for childcare, deciding whether one should leave one’s children alone, paying for childcare and/or deciding whether to bring their children to the polling booth, or even abstaining from voting in the first place. Each cost tradeoff represents a cost of voting that African American parents have at much higher intensities in comparison to their white …show more content…
The new time frame representing two-weeks before Election Day. This includes two Sunday’s and two work day weekends to ensure that those based on non-salary jobs have the opportunity to make it to their closest polling station for convenience and to reduce religious discrimination. Polling stations are also subject to this reform. There needs to be an increased number of polling stations represented at universities, libraries, and other appropriate locations to ensure transportation is a limited factor when one is deciding to vote for a candidate in the two-week early-voting period, or on Election Day. These measures provide positive rational, sociological, and psychological aspects to voting based on reduced cost. A reduced difficulty of transportation cost, childcare cost, and loss of work will be limited due to new time-frames. This will promote eligible voters to make it to the polls with minimal systematic barriers so they can focus on the candidates and issues that are important for themselves and their
Once African American’s were given the right to vote the infamous literacy tests became a prerequisite to vote in southern states. This was a nuisance to the African Americans because they were in place to put a barrier between African Americans and voting, these test were impossible for most African Americans. Another part of the voting process that became difficult and complicated for African Americans was the Application itself. The application differed from state to state but in order to fill it out completely the person would have to include personal information about themselves. Comparing the application to modern applications shows the intentions of the officials and how “important” the questions were.
The percentage of African-Americans and Hispanics who voted in 2008 for the Democratic party was significantly higher than in the 2000 or 2004 election. This graph depicts how the percentage of African-Americans who voted in 2008 (Barak Obama) increased from 88% in 2004 to 95% in 2008. The percentage of Hispanics who voted for the Democratic party from 2004 to 2008 also jumped 14%. A reason for this increase in voter turnout is because Hispanic and African-American voters felt that Barak Obama, the Democratic Presidential candidate, was more capable of solving the problems these minorities felt than a Republican candidate would be.
The article “The 2004 Campaign: The Hispanic Vote” tells me that the American Political System discriminates against Hispanics but i the end relies on their vote, because they have a lot of potential power in determining their states’ electoral college. The role that the minorities play in the election is what way their state of New Mexico will lean in the election because they make up about 42% of the population, although they could “set the stage for battle” in many states such as, Arizona, Nevada and Florida.
All through Alabama a wide range of harsh techniques to keep Negroes from getting to be enrolled voters, and there are a few regions in which… not a solitary Negro is enlisted" This immediate assault on reality of Alabama in this time brings a harsher light to what happens and what is ignored to
Without a certain degree of control over the governmental levels of power, blacks end up disproportionately dependent on white-created legislation and white administration of those laws (Pohlmann, 219). The potential dangers of gerrymandering involves the distribution of blacks into districts where they are diluted into a minority or the creation of districts where blacks are an excessive majority so that an overall district majority white can be achieved (Thornburgh v. Gingles, 31). These redistricting plans severely hindered blacks ability to vote for a representative of their choice (1). However, in order to stem the progress of racially discriminating gerrymandering, these districts are examined based on the impact and district composition
But when voting booths are limited and people are forced to wait in long lines they tend to leave. To some that vote was faught for and needs to be preserved but for others they simply dont have the time of the day to leave work so if there is a line when that blue collar worker gets to his voting place he may not be able to afford to give up the appicable time to wait to vote becuase he has things at home or an even he has to be at. This a real problem the system faces today, in Arizonas 2016 primary certain poll places ran out of votes. Ultimately denying voters the right to vote. With new systems like internet voting being put in place in specific state primaries to determine if it woud be a possibility, but in the end this is just providing temporary fixes to a long term problem. Certain states in the Electoral College system get away with extending voting hours to appeal to blue collar demographics and raise voter turnout. This can be deemed to be not fair to other less important states that suffer the same issues the ones in swing states that have voting hours
Texas is known to have the lowest levels of voting participation in the nation. Numerous factors play a role in the voting inactivity within the state. For instance, some citizens may feel as if their ballot does not have any significance. Others may not have any interest in politics due to the lack of education on the subject or solidarity on issues within the political climate. In addition, age group or income can also be an effect. Citizens exercising their suffrage is important due to the interdependent relationship with our government. To increase voting participation and protect individual’s right to suffrage, there should be the establishment of practice in civic responsibilities and automatic registration, more in-depth teaching of
Author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness and an associate professor here at Ohio State, wrote an article “Why Hilary Clinton Doesn’t Deserve the Black Vote.” This article not only touches on how Hilary Clinton is only using black people as her “winning card (Alexander, 2)” in the 2016 Election, but also her past decisions she made as the wife of the 42nd President of the United States that should be taken into consideration by black voters. Mrs. Clinton and Bernie Sanders are the two Democratic Party presidential candidates. Although Bernie Sanders promises “a political revolution that will bring universal healthcare, a living wage, an end to rampant Wall Street greed, and the dismantling of the vast prison state...(Alexander, 5),” Hilary Clinton seems to be receiving all of the black votes, according to recent polls. Alexander explains that because many African Americans believed (and still believe) that Bill Clinton was the first “black president,” Ms. Clinton will receive several black votes.
“The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that prohibits racial discrimination in voting.” In the 1880’s poll taxes and literacy requirements that afterward advocated African Americans to vote. Meanwhile Klan violence frightens from police and employers, blacks were still “protesting”about voting rights. As a result, there were over two dozen blacks serving in state congress across some
In response to young people or rather more so young African Americans, who are eligible to vote. Many of them decided that they will not vote in this upcoming election, due to their disatisfaction with the presidential candidates. However according to New York Times writer Charles M. Blow this simple minded voting protest is rather “problematic and potentially self-destructive.” Many of the young African who are irritated with the police shootings feel that they should not vote, because of the corruption within their community. Blow in return to this stated “These judgeships alone could cast a long shadow.”
Matsubayashi and Ueda (2010) analyzed whether white voters used candidate race as a voting cues in an election between a white and Black candidate. The data were gathered from local precinct level
The U.S Constitution gives the states considerable latitude in the way of conducting elections. The American citizens have many opportunities to vote. However, a turnout in American elections has dramatically decreased over the past several decades. In order to address this issue, majority of states have allowed absentee voting reforms. These convenient reforms are thought to increase the voter turnout in the elections, as well as to reduce administrative costs.
One of the primary causes for low voter turnout in the United States is low voter registration. In order to vote in state, local, or federal elections, citizens are required to be registered by a certain date before the election. People can register in person, by visiting a state-affiliated election facility, or by mailing their registration forms, postmarked no later than the registration date. Additionally, only 31 states including the District of Columbia give voters the option of registering online. Considering this fact and that we are living in an age with great technological advances, 31 states is far too few. Hence, New York’s inability to modernize voter registration and reach out to new voters effectively lowers the number of registered
Voting has not always been as easy as it is today. It is interesting to examine how far America has progressed in its process of allowing different types of people to be able to vote. Voting was once aimed at a particular group of people, which were white males that owned their own property. Today, most people over the age of eighteen can vote, except for the mentally incompetent or people who have been convicted of major felonies in some states. The decline of voter participation has always been a debate in the public arena. According to McDonald and Popkin, it is “the most important, most familiar, most analyzed, and most conjectured trend in recent American political history (2001, 963)” The question is, how important is voter
In 2012, there was a 15 point gap in voter turnout between those in lower income and higher income households (Nonprofit VOTE). This gap has been decreasing slightly from the 20 point gap in 2000. For turnout rates in regards to age, those aged over 30 accounted for 66% of voters, whereas those aged 18-29 accounted for 45% of voters (Nonprofit VOTE). The 2012 voter turnout by ethnicity were as follows: 66% black turnout, 64% non-Hispanic white turnout, 48% Hispanic turnout, and 47% Asian turnout. This was the first time that the turnout rates for blacks exceeded the turnout rate for whites (The Brookings Institution, 2013). It is possible that the reason behind this increase amongst black voters is due to their desire to support the first black president (The Brookings Institution, 2013). There are a few factors that contribute to low minority turnout rates. Blacks and Hispanics have a poverty rate that is almost three times that of whites, are more likely not to have a piece of photo ID, and are more likely than whites to have difficulty in finding a polling station (The Atlantic, 2014). Voting equality entails that all members must have an equal and fair opportunity to vote. If minorities find it more difficult to vote and as a result are discouraged to vote, I do not believe that such situations would fulfil the criterion of voting