preview

Differences Between Jefferson And The Federalists Dbq

Better Essays

During the Revolutionary period of the 19th century, there were two dominating political parties that had conflicting beliefs: the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans were strict-constructionists and believed that the constitution should be taken as literally as possible. The Federalists on the other hand, were broad constructionists and believed that just because the constitution did not explicitly state something it didn't mean there wasn't an implied meaning. The characterization of these two political parties were shown to be inaccurate during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, because both men found themselves straying from their beliefs in certain circumstances in order to insure the best for their country. First off, Jefferson was challenged with many circumstances during his presidency that required him to go against his strict constructionist beliefs. Some of these included the Louisiana Purchase and the british impressment of US …show more content…

He explains that although he went against his beliefs, his actions were all done for the betterment of the country. Different circumstances call to different measures, and it is the responsibility of a good president to take into account the entire country, not just his own ideologies, in order to lead the country into prosperity. In a letter to a Presbyterian minister, Jefferson claims that “everyone must act according to the dictates of his own reason” (Document B). His presidency might have entirely been a contradiction but generally, Jefferson helped significantly double the size of the country and expand

Get Access