“The greatest ethical test that we're ever going to face is the treatment of those who are at our mercy”.― Lyn White Many a times we are stuck between a decision that pulls us between good and bad, it is a tough choice to make, but we need to make that decision with good moral values. A few years ago the government wanting to win the elections brought migrants into the state promising them employment, a voters ID and a ration card. They believed that by bringing in more people into the state it would be beneficial for the increasing demand for laborers. The government did as they promised, but this greatly affected the state. All this arose to slum areas, sanitary problems and the spread of many diseases. The stakeholders here were the natives.
On the fateful May day of 1846, America, under President James Polk, declared war on Mexico. By the end of the war in 1848, Mexico lost nearly almost half its territory to the United States. Do you think this was justified? Taking another’s land through 2 long years of war? Is it worth it? I believe that Polk and Congress’s decision was wrongful for the following reasons: Polk had provoked war, [American but Amerishouldn’t] and finally the United States was committing a robbery by stealing Texas.
There are many ethical dilemmas that occur daily in our hospitals across the world. Not everyone agrees with standards and policies that are required in hospitals or even with the law. If not everyone obeys the law, ethical cases form. In Springfield, Missouri, a holistic nurse got fired for fighting against Cox South hospital policies. Carla Brock has been a nurse at Cox South hospital and not only refused the flu shot, but also refused to wear a mask. She refused due to religious beliefs, she gets short of breath while wearing the mask, and she feels the mask is meant to intimidate and humiliate those who refuse the shot. The ethical question in this case study is to decide if Carla should have been fired for not wearing a mask after refusing the flu shot and what are other potential proposals. The four-way method will separate out what are the truths, consequences, fairness, and character, of this ethical case study.
There are many examples of ethical decisions throughout American history yet few have had a more profound impact on shaping our country then the paths chosen by the American Revolutionaries. Let’s face it, had it not been for their actions our country would probably look much different today. If it were not for the foresight of our founding fathers, men like Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, or Thomas Paine (1776), who authored arguably the most compelling piece of political propaganda the world had seen to date, Common Sense. After reading Paine’s work I believe that many of the ideals and philosophies are still relevant in modern society, so much so that I was drawn into the relevance and found myself pondering the moral palaver which
The Mythical Norm is a set of attributes that are advantageous in what one seeks to have. These advantages vary in race, class, physical features, sex, sexual orientation, gender, age, and religion. Lorde (2001) describes these norms in America being “defined as white, thin, male, young, heterosexual, Christian, and finally secure” (p. 178). People who seek the Mythical Norm fail to recognize their privilege from those who lack them.
make a rational and ethically sound choice of which option to choose, take prompt action based
Ethical dilemmas occur when there is a disagreement about a situation and all parties involved question how they should behave based on their individual ethical morals. (Newman & Pollnitz, 2005). The dilemma that I will be addressing in this essay involves Michael, recently employed male educator working in the nursery, and parents of a baby enrolled at the centre. The parents have raised concerns about male educators changing their child’s nappy as they have cultural practices that do not allow this practice to take place. This situation is classed as an ethical dilemma as there is a dispute between cultural beliefs and legal requirements within the workplace. There are four parties involved (parents, child, educator and director), all
Reviewing the ethical dilemmas on this topic listed earlier, those with some type of religious background will most likely have a harder time accepting this new area of scientific development. Whereas, those who do not involve religious beliefs in their view point may see CRISPR as a revolutionary scientific discovery that will significantly benefit the greater good. Allowing CRISPR to be further research, and hopefully one day used, can greatly impact billions of people in such an amazing way. Living with an incurable disease or having the potential to develop one later on in life can be detrimental to not only the individual, but the individual’s family. Eliminating terminal genetic diseases will not only relieve people of pain and
Risk; something we do everyday turning onto a street from a blind corner, jaywalking to get somewhere faster, peeking at our phones while driving and signing up for something new. The everyday risks we take can seem meaningless and uneventful, but for others it can mean their lives; for them everything must be in check otherwise it could result in death. Astronauts are trained for months about how to deal with the risks they will be faced with during their missions, along with proper solutions. These solutions are taught to them by the great minds of scientists; whose duty is to also make sure there is the least amount of risk possible for the mission. The scientists communicate to the head of the programs whether they believe the mission is possible or not, if it should be delayed or pushed up. Unfortunately, the communication between the scientists, and high up workers are ignored or misread. This was the case for the Challenger, a mission that lasted 73 seconds before it exploded, because the weather was too cold for the metal on the O-rings around the rocket. 17 Years later a similar miscommunication cause the loss of the Columbia shuttle because it failed to show the seriousness of the loss of foam from the outside of the shuttle.
The United States CPA firm is a stakeholder, because its interests stand to be affected by the decision made. Depending on the decision made, the firm could be deemed excellent for having a senior manager who made a competent decision or could be seen as a firm that needs to improve training for its employees on how to make appropriate ethical decisions.
Ethical issues can be many different situations, so you need to govern yourself based on the morals of the situation. Understanding the situation fully, will allow you to realize the consequences of your actions. Each person ethical issue can be different based on the back ground, cultural, values and beliefs. Someone raised Nigeria will have different take on ethical issues then someone in the United States because of their values and beliefs. This paper will be a case study that examines a mother, daughter and son-in-law of ten years who has illegitimate child that the daughter does not know about and its ethical views.
There was an ethical issue which arose in the United States of America regarding Turing Pharmaceuticals messed up drug pricing (Timmerman 2015) that has gained a lot of attention in recent times. Ethics is the rules of conduct acknowledged in respect to a class of human actions or a group (Diffen 2016). Ethics is important as it affects not only the organization but the community and society at large (Spooner n.d.). This essay will discuss about how unethical Turing Pharmaceuticals acted in the case of price hiked in a 62-year-old AIDS drug. This is not the first time a drug price has hiked, but it is undeniably one of the largest hikes. Especially when the drug can make a difference between life and death, it is a serious ethical issue
I used to think about any moral situation I faced as either right or wrong, black or white. In retrospect, thinking about those situations, I realized that I was facing the right-right decision conflict, where equally moral principles are
What are the relevant facts of the case? What facts are not known? Can I learn more about the situation? Do I know enough to make a decision?
“Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company and part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design repairs for their repair” (Bartlett). Brad is considering replacing a broken brake cable with a more durable material, even though the customer did not request it in their order and specifically requested that “No aesthetic changes be made to the bike” (Bartlett). Brad’s manager suggests that his considered actions would go against the company’s policy of “The customer is always right.” Should Brad disobey the manager and the customer to possibly lose his job or go along with
Ethical dilemmas, are situations in which one must make a decision that interferes with one’s personal beliefs, making it difficult to make a suitable decision. To make a good ethical decision it is necessary to have some sensitivity towards the issue without letting it cloud your judgement. Also, it requires to explore the ethical aspects of which could be a crucial decision. Many people unknowingly obtain a “moral institution” through their parents, peers and practice it daily without even knowing. When presented with a tough and unfamiliar situation is not always appropriate to follow your immediate institutions because no situation is ever the same. Sometimes it’s easier to just pick the easier choice, the most familiar one, but would this be the most ethical on? No because to make an informed ethical solution you must see the bigger picture. The more complicated the situation the more important it is to rely your decision making on dialog with others, regardless of what you think of their position in the matter; by doing so they can assist in bringing up different perspectives.