Day Reporting Centers

Corrections have existed throughout society for many years and continued to change and evolve in the United States reflecting society’s values and ideals throughout the centuries. In the criminal justice system, corrections exist in more than one form. Not only do corrections refer to jails and prison systems but they also pertain to community-based programs, such as probation, parole, halfway houses, and treatment facilities. Past, present, and future trends in regard to the development and operation of institutional and community-based corrections vary between states but corrections have grown immensely since the early 1800s and have continued to expand

As the need for increasingly punitive community-based sanctions grew, the demand for a greater variety of programs and services became apparent, as did the importance of a more seamless transition from total incapacitation to total freedom of prisoners re-entering society. A variety of community corrections methods have developed over the years, one being the institution of halfway houses. To adequately understand residential community corrections, one must consider the origins, components, and effectiveness of halfway houses.

Day Reporting Centers are intermediate sanction programs are innovations that serve as a step between the security and punishment of prisons and jails and the supervision without the security offered in probation and parole. Such programs as intensive supervision, house arrest, and electronic monitoring are becoming accepted alternatives to incarceration. Day Reporting Centers are another intermediate sanction that is gaining popularity. Day Reporting allows the treatment and supervision of arrested individuals and convicted offenders in a setting that is more secure than ordinary probation but less inhibiting and less expensive than incarceration. (Siegel and Bartollas, 2014 pg 104). In playing out this errand, Day Reporting Centers satisfy three particular and unmistakable purposes: 1) improved supervision and diminished freedom of the guilty party; 2) treatment of offenders issues; and 3) decreased crowding of imprisonment offices that this assortment of reason serves to fulfill an assortment of objectives in contrasting remedial methods of insight. The lessening of guilty party versatility and freedom bolsters a discipline reasoning and may go about as a particular obstruction to future criminal action. These confinements additionally take into account a specific measure of weakening and, in this way, security of the general population. The capacity to offer offenders required treatment aids their redress or recovery. In conclusion, Day Reporting is fundamentally less expensive to work that remedial organization, taking into account more prominent cost adequacy.

Day reporting centers is a more severe form of correctional sentencing, there are some similarities that tie in with probation supervision. Offenders that are on on supervision probation usually are required to check in with their probation officer monthly or only every 3 months but, day reporting centers have it set up so that offenders have to visit a specific center 3 to 6 days each week for an average duration of 5 months. Some visits may be as simple as checking in, but others visits might require for the offender to be apart of classes or outpatient treatment. Day reporting centers aim to provide offenders with access to treatment or services, and they typically supervise offenders who have previously violated probation conditions,

Both jail and prison offer some type of early released programs, in this case probation and parole will briefly be discussed. Probation is a prison sentence that is suspended on the condition that the offender follow certain prescribed rules and commit no further crime (Seiter, 2008). Parole is similar to probation except that it is after a period of incarceration, which involved determinate and indeterminate sentencing (Seiter, 2008). The other types of prison sentencing include mandatory minimums, three-strike laws, and truth-in-sentencing (Wilson, 2001). The only difference is that a parole board allows convicts to serve the remainder of their term in society under supervision and strict limitations (Wilson, 2001). In summary both jails and prisons should strive to provide as much educational, health, and counseling opportunities as possible to reduce the likelihood of recidivism. Second, funding for the jail and prison systems will be briefly discussed.

Prisons are correctional facilities where offenders are incarcerated as punishment and deterrent from engaging in other criminal activities. It serves justice for victims of criminal offenses and provides a chance for the offender to reflect, and with prison time; they will become better citizens of society. This however, may not always be the case. If an inmate exhibits understanding of good behavior and structure, a prisoner may not serve his or her full sentence in prison. They may be released on Home Detention Curfew (tagging) or granted parole. Some offenders get up to half of their sentence time removed. In both situations, the inmate is expected to benefit from integration in the community and leading a positive lifestyle. According to the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (1), there are laid down laws who is legible and who is illegible to early release from prison. The Department of corrections can allow early release of an offender if they exhibit commendable behavior and take part in other recommended programs for disciplinary treatment, while in prison. There are individuals who agree and disagree for the idea of early release from prison. Individuals of both sides have specific reasons for their position on the effects of early prison release. Giving inmates a chance to portray positive and beneficial behavior, allows them to gain responsibility and incentive, in order to strive for success. In contrary, according to Christine

The characteristics of day reporting centers (DRC) are facility where probationary offender report every day to probate counseling (Siegel, L., 2014). Social skills and other rehabilitative activities, also where they file daily schedules with their supervising officer showing how each hour will be spent (Siegel, L., 2014).Day reporting is another form of intermediate sanction (Siegel, L., 2014).The offender must report on a regular basis at a specific time every day to participate in activities such as counseling, social skills training, and employment training (Siegel, L. and Bartollas, C., 2014).

Juveniles have always been a touchy subject in the criminal justice system. Many would argue that they deserve to be treated and sentenced as adults while others believe that they can be rehabilitated and changed into fully functioning members of society. Florida has established a Juvenile Detention Alternatives initiative in order to support the vision that all juvenile justice offenders would have opportunities put in place to develop them into law-abiding adults. This initiative uses core strategies and decision-making skills based on data driven policies and practices that will reduce secure detention placements and promote healthy lifestyles for the youth while also enhancing public safety. A program established by the Department of Juvenile Justice in Florida hopes to do just that. Intensive Delinquency Diversion Services, also referred to as the IDDS, is offered to youth who are first time offenders. This intense community and home-based intervention hopes to deter offenders from becoming lifelong criminals. This paper will give a brief background the program, a summary and description of the program, a theory that supports the program, and finally policy implications of the IDDS program.

Successful ISP completion, which is the goal of all ISP, is not affected by jail nor by community based sanctions. The authors offer many reason as to why the findings were as such including a limiting field, and the fact that regardless of the sanction, some offenders will offend regardless of the punishment. The fact that jail is not more effective is a point in and of itself. This meaning that if jail is not more effective, and community sanctions have more benefits for the offender- why would jail sanctions continue to be used as often as they are being used? Considering the negative impacts of jail on the offender, why would they be so quick to be used in every case? If the cons outweigh the pros regarding jail sanctions, maybe we all need to start creating community based means that would be more effective- and provide the means for those who want to institute such sanctions but do not have the budget to do so. The article ends making the point that yes, sometimes offenders need to be placed in jail to keep society safe. It needs to be analyzed offender by offender what the effect will be on the person if this is done and whether a community based sanction would be more effective for that person in convincing them to stop violating their parole or probation since neither has been shown to lead to successful completion of

A number of alternatives have been created, including intensive probation or parole, house arrest, electronic monitoring, shock probation/parole, boot camp/shock incarceration and day reporting centers (Peak, 2010). Ideally, alternatives to incarceration should have three elements to be effective, which are as follows: “It must incapacitate offenders enough to make recidivism difficult, it must be unpleasant enough to have a deterrent effect, and it must provide real and credible community protection” (Peak, 2010, p. 318). The alternative that will be addressed in this discussion is electronic monitoring because it is used in conjunction with other alternative methods.

In prisons today, rehabilitation, deterrence, incapacitation, and retribution are all elements that provide a justice to society. Prisons effectively do their part in seeing that one if not more of these elements are met and successfully done. If it were not for these elements, than what would a prison be good for? It is highly debated upon whether or not these elements are done properly. It is a fact that these are and a fact that throughout the remainder of time these will be a successful part of prison life.

Day reporting centers are designed to help change the way an offender thinks, provide education, and job training. Reducing an offender's re arrest, help them with reentry by giving them programs and services, and holding them accountable for their own actions, are the main goals. Although the division

Although during the recent years theories and laws continue to evolve, there is one aspect that remains the same: children, juvenile, and adult non-violent offenders are given the opportunity to partially or completely bypass certain sanctions of their punishment. As there is an increase in prison overcrowdings, there is also an increase in expenses for the taxpayers of the community, causing great concern. If inmate population is to be maintained under control, the continuous use of community corrections programs is inevitable. Overall, research demonstrates that the percentage of the prison population frequently diminishes with the use of community corrections programs. Supervision of these programs is, therefore, offered at a significantly lower cost than incarceration as it oversees “offenders outside of jail or prison” (Community Corrections, 2014).

Recommendation 10 - Engage the community to help reduce the likelihood offenders will return to a life of offense. Critical thinking, positive relationships, and healthy behaviors are critical to offenders' success upon release. Recommendation 11 - Increase structured guidelines to respond to technical parole violations, based on risk and seriousness. Sanctions and incentives are important tools. While each state's arrangement for parole is varied, these recommendations can easily be adapted by legislative and corrections leaders to apply to their probation and parole practices. Proposal 11 is predominantly important because many technical violations of probation and parole often result in a return to prison for people who have not committed a new crime and may be handling the transition from prison well. While we certainly want these people following the rules, sending them to prison without committing a new crime wipes out the progress they have made while in the general public (probation and parole, 2010).

The idea of probation refers to the release of an offender from detention based upon good behavior. Probation, itself, is the process in which offenders are monitored by officers in an attempt to correct their behavior and prevent further offenses. This process, however, is centered on the idea of changing cognitive processing toward crime, to implement operant conditioning and to manipulate social learning, all of this relating to a psychological lens. Using these separate techniques creates the overall idea of probation and is able to formulate the ways in which it works.