To Cursive or Not to Cursive?
A fifteen year old straight “A” student walked into the Department of Motor Vehicles with her mother. The excitement of becoming a driver for the first time quickly faded when the girl was required to sign her name. The girl was mortified that she didn’t know how. The mother couldn’t help but wonder if her child’s generation was filled with cursive illiterates? Cursive writing should be a curriculum requirement for grade school students not only because it is required on legal documents but it is important to understand information written in cursive and it improves penmanship.
Teenagers and young adults are increasingly faced with embarrassment because of their lacking knowledge in the art of handwriting. For many young adults it starts with getting a driver’s license. As the amount of things that an individual wants in life increases the more their signature is needed. The big things like a car and house can be thwarted for a short time by living in a city with public transportation and with parents or roommates. There comes a point in life when personal needs and wants become clear and the skill of signing one’s name becomes a necessity. Going to college or getting married and having children require tedious amounts of paperwork that repeatedly asks a person to sign on the dotted line. Sometimes these legal
…show more content…
However, many teachers hang up the printed version of these documents. The discarded cursive penmanship negates the traditional and historical ambiance behind each document. This class of ambiance is also found in formal invitations like wedding announcements, graduation invites, and retirement parties. The elegant form of cursive writing bears a sentimental tone which is meant to be perceived as having a higher level of intimacy and importance than printed
Lessons that might have been learned and inspiration that might have been found will be lost” (Porter & Eilts). These words show that in due time, humanity will lose understanding of the written word. We will no longer be able to understand what our ancestors left behind. What they fought hard to make will lose its meaning in a world with no cursive. The handwriting of those many individuals is a personal quality that people in the 20th century can relate to.
Finally, cursive writing slows you down. Cursive writing slows you down by just trying to write it. It looks cool at times but what about the kids that can’t read or type it. If anything teachers should have taught this subject at the beginning of the year it’s the end of our 3rd quarter year and were just now starting to learn it. Most of the grades teach it in 6th grade witch is very crazy because most 6th graders don’t know how to write in cursive.
First and foremost, in this article the thesis statement is about how the art of cursive along with the curriculum of the subject is no longer offered to children in school. Also, the evidence that supports this thesis is clearly explained throughout the story about how teachers no longer feel that cursive writing is needed in school, and how technology is a huge factor in schools which pretty much eliminates the need to teach the skill of writing or using cursive penmanship. Furthermore, the author’s style of this article is fictional and states a lot of interesting factors that have been researched, how times have changed. In fact, education just isn’t the same and probably will continue to become more dependent on technology. All in all,
Many students believe that cursive is extremely hard, but it takes time and practice. If you have to sign in cursive then why not learn it. In fact, Cursive isn’t only a way to write, but is a way of art. Many really important things are written in cursive. Though, cursive is hard to write it is better than print. Print is pretty much a waste of time. In fact, cursive takes a shorter amount of time than print. Print can be messy and you have to lift the pen or pencil to write a letter and word, but in cursive you only have to lift it one word at a
Taught more than thirty decades ago, cursive writing has a famed and legendary past. It was once a vital element of American education but is now becoming an archaic artefact as technology advancement and the requirement of more regulated tests push it out of the education system. Cursive writing should be scrapped out of the education system for there is no need of wasting time and resources to continue teaching a skill that won’t be beneficial to the students in the near future.
Putting pen to paper stimulates the brain like no other. Learning to write in cursive is shown to improve thoughts, terminology, and functioning memory. Cursive handwriting stimulates brain synapses and both the left and right hemispheres of the brain. This type of handwriting also leads to increased comprehension and participation in the classroom. Studies have also shown that students who wrote in cursive on the SAT standardized test scored slightly higher than those who didn’t. People are starting to believe that cursive is now completely irrelevant because they are not included in Common Core State Standards. The fact is is that Common Core only consists of skills that are testable and assessable.
As a result, the physical act of inciting in cursive is shown to increment comprehension and participation. Interestingly, a few years ago, the College Board found that students who indicated in cursive for the essay proportion of the SAT scored scarcely higher than those who printed, which experts believe is because the speed and efficiency of inciting in cursive sanctioned the students to fixate on the content of their essay.Some argue that the cursive is no longer pertinent because it isn't included in the prevalent core state standards. But these standards only include those skills that are testable and quantifiable in the classroom; they don't address facile substratum skills, like editing or even spelling.
Elementary schools used to have a major focus on handwriting and teaching the students how to write in cursive. There is a section on the SAT where each student has to write out a code of honorability in cursive. In the small classroom that I sat in to take the SAT, four students raised their hand and said they never learned cursive. Now, students take more time doing typing exercises on the computer. This is what technology is doing to our
It has come to my attention that cursive is very important to our nation, it was even used to write the declaration of independents so if we did not learn how read cursive are nation would be in chaos we would have no rules. In my opinion, I think that cursive should be taught. First of all cursive writing is also used for many things like signing our names, next cursive writing was also used in are most historical events. Lastly cursive writing also gives are brain physical qualities that normal print does not.
Cursive should be taught to everyone it's an important and unique attribute. Also, it's a very impressive ability too some people that dont know the type of writting. Like the passage said its an important brain stimulant. Cursive is something that everyone should get a chance to learn.
Cursive writing in schools being taught is a very complicated issue. There are different things I agree with, and disagree with from both perspectives.
This is known as the “handwriting effect,” proved by Steve Graham at Arizona State, who found that “when teachers are asked to rate multiple versions of the same paper differing only in legibility, neatly written versions of the paper are assigned higher marks for overall quality of writing than are versions with poorer penmanship.” Typing levels the playing field.” This makes sense to why most writing assignments are typed. I am quite happy about this because I once knew a boy in New York that had the worst handwriting. Most teachers and students neglected him for his terrible handwrite. Teachers having to grade his papers. And students having to read his handwriting when teachers have the students grade the test. But he was really smart; when he wants to be. Theresome students in school now that have the same
In the questions of schools allowing and/or using the structure of cursive writing or not using the structure of cursive writing is something that can effect every individual differently. In my opinion, i think schools and everywhere else needed, that cursive writing should be used because as the article states, writing by hand helps individuals remember ideas more efficiant then typing and it makes you actually think and summarize ideas, not just simply recording them.
As the two positions posed above have stated, it is a matter of grave importance that school and its systems should contemplate the importance of cursive handwriting and whether it should remain or be forsaken as some method of unwarranted use. Whereas both sides have their own opinions, one must consult each and formulate his or her own thought on the matter. For example, though cursive handwriting may be found to be lacking use in today's technologically-fueled society, the benefits of cursive writing in a variety of situations over typing cannot be underestimated. Such fields and the situations concern the modern problems of identity, beneficiary subjects, and strength versus ease.
Imagining our future citizens being unable to write their own signature is truly a bewildering thought. Unfortunately, this reality is a very possible and likely outcome for our country as schools around the United States are debating whether or not to keep cursive writing in their curriculums. Some states believe it is a vital and basic necessity of education, while others think print handwriting would do just fine. Generally, this matter has proven to be a very controversial topic that largely impacts education. From the Sources, it can be gathered that there are many credible arguments to this debate, however, it is evident that the benefits of maintaining cursive writing in schools outweigh the negatives, if any.