Crusades Dbq Research Paper

This is (important/interesting/relevant) The attack of the Byzantine Capital had no responsibility as well as weren’t included for the Crusades. The depressing result as why they attacked the Capital was for the treasures they had in store as the soldiers made themselves fall into the evil of greed.As it represents, the Crusaders in both sides were responsible and were never held accountable for their actions of brutal and insightful murders due to the beliefs and biases those people had for

The reason that the Crusades are positive is because of trading, business, trade, and luxury. When the Crusader came back, they introduced luxuries such as spices, silk, and sugar. The trading came when Crusaders opened up

The Crusades were European Christians who wanted to take back Jerusalem. The Crusades killed many people along the way. Which leads us to a question. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or Negative?

To begin with, wars were never a good thing so why would anyone think that the crusades were positive. Document 6 states that in the 4th Crusade was a destructive and wasteful event that divided the Christian world. This is important because the Fourth Crusade, like the rest, was a was that cause many lives to be lost. It took place in 1204 and in Jerusalem, it states “...sacked the Christian (Eastern Orthodox) city of Constantinople, capital of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire).”Document 4 states that in the Fourth Crusade, to add on more information, there was so many things that had went wrong and never recovered.This is relevant because the fourth document states “destroying the

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

One of the reasons why the Crusaders wanted to gain control over the Holy Land was because it was important to their religion, Christianity. The Holy Land was where they believed Jesus died. But, they couldn’t gain control over the land because Muslims wanted it, too. Just like Christianity, the Holy Land was important to

The Crusades were battles between European Christians and Muslims, they were fought at the holy land which is Jerusalem . The crusades started in 1095 and ended on 1291. It started because byzantium crumbled and The pope called western christians to take back the holy land. There were both positive and negative about the crusades.The real question is were the results of the crusades more positive or negative. What I have read and annotated I think there is more positive than negative.

Islam wanted to destroy the Christian faith and culture so the Christian’s only defense was the Crusades. The Crusades were a double-edged sword; acts of great sacrifice and love, and on the other hand acts of brutal hatred. The widespread massacre of Muslims, Jews, and other non-Christians resulted in resentment even today. However, the Crusades produced stronger countries, the rise of towns as the center of trade and commerce, travel and transportation improved throughout Europe, Christianity spread, new knowledge and skills were acquired from contact with the East.

For four-hundred and sixty-three years before the first crusade Christians repeatedly suffered bloody attacks from the Muslims. In their search for riches the Muslims destroyed churches, namely the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, and shrines along the way and the Islamic belief was spread throughout Europe. The Holy Land had been defiled and desecrated and taken from the Christians. The response, a holy-war. While some see the crusades as an act of religious justification others see a well thought plan by some to gain religious, social, and even political power that resulted in an unjust massacre of innocent people.

The Positive Effects of the Crusades The Crusades were a series of religious, military expeditions -nine in all- to recover Holy Land from the Muslims. (Karls) While the Crusades were considered a pilgrimage to the Catholic church, it didn't stop the crusaders from causing havoc. Regardless of this, there were a few positive outcomes that came out of the Crusades. Jerusalem, a city in the middle east, was a holy city for three different religions: the Jews, the Christians, and the Muslims.

As such, the brutal actions and only marginal motivation by religion classify the crusades as a negative time in history because of their negative impact and suffering of many innocent people. By killing thousands of innocent people who did not deserve to die nor needed to during the crusades, the crusaders show themselves as heinous and vicious, not the type of people that they intended to be. And by looting, pillaging, and attempting to expand one's power over a group that, in the first place, asked for the help of the crusaders, the crusades show themselves as not being a war of religion but a war of brutality, a quest for power and a mission to amount as much wealth as one can. This was mostly due to the fact that pope Urban II allowed

In the current news, the tensions between the Islamic and Christian faith are a recurring topic that sparks conversations between many people. The history behind this religious conflict goes back into the early 7th and 8th centuries during the times of the Byzantine and Western European Empires. Although the conflicts between the two religions may have not been profound in the past, they were solidified due to the Crusades. Lasting from 1096 to 1204 CE, the Crusades are a prominent event in history and they had a significant impact on both the Byzantine and Western European Empires. These four expeditions involved the long distance travel from Europe to the Middle East, the loss of many innocent lives and the destruction of cities and important

There were both positive and negative effects of The Crusades, although the positives did outweigh the negatives. The two major negative effects were anti-Semitism and the orchestrated attacks by Venice. Many Crusaders in Europe were so religiously fuming, that they turned their anger towards the Jews. They would at times massacre a whole community as a result of their religious rage. During the fourth crusade, crusaders began fighting Christians instead of Muslims. After helping Venetian merchants defeat their Byzantine trade rivals in 1204, the crusaders captured and looted Constantinople. They actually ransacked the capital of the Byzantine Empire, the empire in which they began to fight for, not against. There also were many positive effects of The Crusades, one being the increase of trade. Even before the Crusades, merchants began to enjoy some of the luxury goods that were brought from the Byzantine Empire. The crusaders that

The Crusades were the first occasion when that European officers had gone outside the fringes of Europe to attempt to force their will and their way of life on other individuals. This state of mind extended into the period of revelation. The campaigns, thusly, may be seen as the initial phase in the long history of there were effects of the Crusades other than religion. For positive effect, you're not going to see a considerable measure of advantage for anybody however Europeans. A tremendous positive force was that Europeans were unprotected to divine beings they weren't generally mindful.

The Muslims and Crusaders only lost lives, which was tragic and unfortunate, but they didn’t lose anywhere near enough lives for it to have a substantial or lasting impact. On the other hand, Jews losing their place in society was something that continued to affect them for decades to follow with the rise of anti-semitism during the Crusades sparked a long-lasting hatred of Jews. And while the Jews didn’t gain anything from the Crusades, the Muslims and Christians gained culturally. The Crusades lead to the expansion of trade, which lead to Christians being exposed to foreign goods, foods, and ideas. Crusaders encountered exotic food items like coffee, sugar, rhubarb, rice, sherbet, and fruits such as apricots, dates, lemons and melons for the first time (Lougheed). They also adopted irrigation techniques, the use of painkillers, algebra, chemistry, arabic numerals, and the game of chess from the Muslims (Lougheed). Muslims gained from the Crusades as well. They got exposure to new weapons and military tactics (Lougheed). To conclude, the negative consequences of the Crusades on Christians and Muslims weren’t long-term or very significant, which they were for the Jews, and the Crusades were even an advantage to them with the expansion of trade leading to the exposure to new goods and ideas, while Jews didn’t gain