The author maintains that observational centered method of studying is not accurate, rather interview centered method bears more accurate result of study. The argument, stated in a dubious way, fails to mentions some key factors and reveals some instances of poor reasoning, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. However, in order to fully evaluate this we need to have significant amount of additional evidences. The argument is much weaker than it seems. First of all, Dr. Karp’s assumption is based on 20 years ago study which might not be true in the present situation. Over the passage of time, surrounding of the village might have changed significantly. For example, some westerners had settled on that village and might have influenced them to change their common trend. Hence, it would certainly weakened Dr. Karp’s assumption. In this case his study could have been correct but his assumptions on the view of Dr. Fields method would be seriously weakened. Another piece of evidence …show more content…
For example W why did they say about their parent? Additionally, we also don’t about the responses of the children for that questions. It would completely undermine Dr Kelps argument if it turned out that the children said how much they miss their parents or how their parents left them for in communal environment. Therefore, its impossible to conclude without knowing their true response to the questions. So without convincing answers, the reader is left with the impressions that the claims made by the author are more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. Clearly, from above discussion, we can conclude that we need more evidence about surrounding of the village as well as the type of questionnaires asked during the interview or else the author’s argument can’t be granted as correct
The authors used participant observation and interview to do this research. I think the method of field work that provided the most insightful information was the method of participant observation. By
Throughout today’s society, media contributes to almost everyone’s daily life. From informative news channels to comical television shows, media proves to be effective in advertisement, releasing messages and informing the audience. Although media proves to be wildly effective in advertising, releasing messages and informing the audience, periodically destructive and misleading messages are provided to the audience and directly influencing women. Cultural critics widely agree that media tends to negatively influence women and all the critics point to research which supports the belief that women are portrayed as subordinate to men, having no
Transcripts and field notes from observations were used equally in the analysis and both types of information are referred to as “data”. Although field observations compared to interviews could be interpreted as of lesser importance in the analyses, such data is of great value as it in many ways serve as the basis for the questions asked in the interview. For example, based on the field observations, the researcher could ask about a given observed behavior or relate a participant's answer to an observed behavior.
It has recently been brought to my attention that our school is looking to adopt a sustainable menu into our meal program and I would like to give my viewpoint on the matter. As one many students here at Oxford Academy this change will affect me directly. Although people may at first oppose this conversion I think if we are able to overcome the first obstacles, this change would bring a great positive impact to the environment and the health of our students.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a fairly common complication in hospitalized patients. Nosocomial infection prevention and patient safety promotion has been issued and many researches have been conducted to improve patient’s quality of life. In this article, Saint et al. (2005) hypothesize that using a paper-based urinary catheter reminder can reduce the incidence of urinary catheterization, and consequently this will enhance the patients’ safety.
When students reach their junior and senior years of high school, they are faced with pressure from teachers, counselors, and parents to choose and apply to colleges. Instead of succumbing to the pressure, some students choose to pursue careers with no degree necessary or careers in the military. Other students are still left contemplating whether or not college is worth the financial strain. When other factors such as future career earnings, personal growth, and potential friendships and relationships are considered, it becomes clear that college truly is worth the cost.
Despite our age differences, Lehigh and I have quite a bit in common. Lehigh and I share a desire for growth, the ability to withstand time, and a vast interest in the unknown.
In order for alien eyes to see what humans can’t see the structure and the amount of their photoreceptor cells, have to differ.
Throughout the process of developing our own position, we must draw ideas from other people. This process is called synthesis, as it involves considering various viewpoints in order to create a new viewpoint. However, it is extremely important to know as much as possible about the topic. The main point of synthesizing sources is to enter the conversation that society is having, with logical evidence to back yourself up. But, when looking for reliable source, be aware of a bias that the source might bring to the topic. A writer must analyze the rhetorical situation, even when it comes to sources and documentation. As we further develop skills in writing synthesis essays, the sources that we use will inform our position on the topic. Throughout the essay, the main event is what we have to say, your position is central. As the writer, it is your job to analyze the sources you come across, and to see which one appeals to the audience you are presenting to.
The source Limits on Risks for Healthy Volunteers in Biomedical Research states that the Yellow Fever Tests were meant to find the cause of the spread of Yellow Fever. This is important to this argument because it shows that there are necessary risks in order to make good progress. Even though the some of the volunteers died from Yellow Fever, it allowed scientists to find the vector (mosquitos). This test is used by both sides to support their argument. Pro-restriction people use it as a showing of the inherent risk of biomedical testing, while anti-restriction people use it as a showing of the results outweighing the costs. A mix of both sides should be put in place. As stated in the last post, a restriction such as Soft Paternalism should
The author cites qualitative research articles and nursing education manuals and training manuals from many different authors and time periods. There were no quantitative studies cited. All research article referenced were relevant to the study, most were greater than seven years old and older. No evaluations of strengths or weaknesses were available for referenced material. The limitations of this study were named as: “data was exploratory, It was not the specific intention to explore the management of the patient who refuses care; the topic came from the inductive data analysis.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 349) It is relevant as this is a previously unexplored area of nursing.(Aveyard, 2004, p. 349) The author builds a logical argument through discussion of nursing education, and the fact that nursing education and the focus of informed consent in nursing education is on the nurse’s role in obtaining consent prior to medical procedures and research procedures, and not prior to nursing care procedures. The author uses the argument that the lack of discussion on informed consent does not negate its importance and it purpose which is to protect a patients autonomy .(Aveyard, 2004, p. 346)
For such research, and according to the situation of the village where could be identified different group of people, the researcher should use the stratified random sampling. Such strategy would ensure that those groups are fairly represented in the sample. Therefore, independent
Formal and informal discussions were carried out with officials, village elders, farmers, local leaders, women, school teachers, government workers, students, tourists and social workers. v. Direct Observation
Process tracing can be defined as the systematic examination of diagnostic evidence selected and analyzed in light of research questions and hypotheses posed by the investigator (Collier, 2011, 823). The hallmark of process tracing is that multiple types of evidence are employed for the verification of a single inference, bits and pieces of evidence that embody different units of analysis (Gerring 2009, 173). I chose this method because of its emphasis on causality which is very appropriate and suitable to answer my research question. By prioritizing fine-grained research the method allows the researcher to generate and assess critical data, thus enhancing efforts at both theory testing and theory development (Tansey 2007, 771). According to
Questionnaire was chosen to gather information on villagers since; adequate information can be collected from a large size of the villagers in a short period of time and in a cost effective manner. Also, the information captured from villagers and quantified through the use of charts, graphs and table with limited effects to its validity and reliability. The structured questions allowed for exploration of the pattern and trends, which aided in understanding the awareness of villagers. Its context