preview

Crime Victimization

Decent Essays

Violent victimization and hooking up among strangers may be two separate and independent issues, but they have areas and aspects that have similarities. However, it is imperative to understand these two aspects are common in the current societies and communities, and changing ideas and perspectives in the world has propagated them. Shaffer and Ruback (2002) suggest that violent victimization, as an independent aspect, is a feature found among younger people in the community, and further, can be classified in intensity among various aspects such as age, gender, race, and to some extent, the level and extent of physical development. These authors find that some people are more at risk of violent victimizations than others. Additionally, the authors …show more content…

These pressures and popular culture demands and guidelines around when a person should start a family played a central part in increasing the presence of hooking up among strangers. These areas include the fact that many people delay in finding serious, meaningful relationships and thus, prefer to find out easier ways of achieving gratification of companionship and sexual relief without the commitment that would be required in a real relationship. These instances of hooking up with a stranger or sexual relationships of a casual nature tend to provide a welcome alternative to the opposing idea, which is a serious commitment that is required in conventional and traditional romantic or love- based relationships. Each of these relationships may have each its advantages and disadvantages and understandably their individual share of risks. The presence of commitment in a relationship and casual sexual relationships have been steadily fading and blurring because of the exposure and the social pressures for young people to become more open, free and liberal. Tomsich, et al. (2013) study, increases the number of writings and literature that has been prepared around the current and growing trend of social interaction, sexuality, and …show more content…

Seigel (2006) further suggests that this theory differs from the victim precipitation theory in a major way since the victims of victimization does not have any effect on the crime to be committed. The victims do not play any part in increasing the instances of victimizations on themselves. Rather, the victims suffer victimization as a result of being in areas that are prone to such actions and interactions. Therefore, the theory recommends a total change of the venue or place that the victims lives so that he or she leaves the deviant place. The places where these crimes are high are known as deviant, and these areas will increase the chances of an individual's victimization, and there is nothing that the individual can do to change this, except moving from the deviant areas. However, there are trends. that arise from an analysis of lifestyles, and deviant areas since it has been noted that social and economic inequality over time has resulted in more minorities in the victim seat. Under the deviant theory, it becomes evident that more minorities are found in low-income areas and because they have low incomes, they find themselves unable to move away from the same areas, which are crime ridden and deviant. Of note is that there are no sufficient

Get Access