Violent victimization and hooking up among strangers may be two separate and independent issues, but they have areas and aspects that have similarities. However, it is imperative to understand these two aspects are common in the current societies and communities, and changing ideas and perspectives in the world has propagated them. Shaffer and Ruback (2002) suggest that violent victimization, as an independent aspect, is a feature found among younger people in the community, and further, can be classified in intensity among various aspects such as age, gender, race, and to some extent, the level and extent of physical development. These authors find that some people are more at risk of violent victimizations than others. Additionally, the authors …show more content…
These pressures and popular culture demands and guidelines around when a person should start a family played a central part in increasing the presence of hooking up among strangers. These areas include the fact that many people delay in finding serious, meaningful relationships and thus, prefer to find out easier ways of achieving gratification of companionship and sexual relief without the commitment that would be required in a real relationship. These instances of hooking up with a stranger or sexual relationships of a casual nature tend to provide a welcome alternative to the opposing idea, which is a serious commitment that is required in conventional and traditional romantic or love- based relationships. Each of these relationships may have each its advantages and disadvantages and understandably their individual share of risks. The presence of commitment in a relationship and casual sexual relationships have been steadily fading and blurring because of the exposure and the social pressures for young people to become more open, free and liberal. Tomsich, et al. (2013) study, increases the number of writings and literature that has been prepared around the current and growing trend of social interaction, sexuality, and …show more content…
Seigel (2006) further suggests that this theory differs from the victim precipitation theory in a major way since the victims of victimization does not have any effect on the crime to be committed. The victims do not play any part in increasing the instances of victimizations on themselves. Rather, the victims suffer victimization as a result of being in areas that are prone to such actions and interactions. Therefore, the theory recommends a total change of the venue or place that the victims lives so that he or she leaves the deviant place. The places where these crimes are high are known as deviant, and these areas will increase the chances of an individual's victimization, and there is nothing that the individual can do to change this, except moving from the deviant areas. However, there are trends. that arise from an analysis of lifestyles, and deviant areas since it has been noted that social and economic inequality over time has resulted in more minorities in the victim seat. Under the deviant theory, it becomes evident that more minorities are found in low-income areas and because they have low incomes, they find themselves unable to move away from the same areas, which are crime ridden and deviant. Of note is that there are no sufficient
After the way this racist, foul mouth, cursed out H.S.I and Peter Li, Valarie Ianniello, Executive Director of AHWF has the audacity to write this...
Have you ever thought of using Victimology in a non-Criminal Justice job? Yes, my purpose of taking this class is to learn new information and use it in a non-criminal job position. As a nurse, you deal with different types of victims and not all victims are a result of a criminal act. Our book defines victim as a person who suffers physical, emotional, and financial harm because of illegal activity. Which is true, but furthermore, a victim can be a person in an auto accident, a house fire, a victim of cancer or a child that is repeatedly bullied at school every day. I believe these are examples of victims that are not a result of criminal or illegal
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), every year a survey called the National Crime Victimization Survey collects data on non-fatal crimes (BJS, 2015). The BJS conduct this survey every year to find out how many personal crimes are being committed and how many of those crimes are being reported or not reported. Personal crimes can range from rape to robbery to burglary to larceny. The last important thing to note here is that the survey gathers information about the offender, this includes sex, race, and age. Some discrepancy that my come up is that the information that this survey gathers is from a sample of only 90,000 household and approximately 160,000 people. One question to ask would be where were the houses chosen from,
The UCR, Uniform Crime Reports and NCVS, National Crime Victimization Survey are designed to gather data on the national crime rates in the United States. The UCR collects and reports raw figures on the crime rates per 100,000, the changes in crime rates and clearance rates. NCVS provides information about victims, offenders, and crimes, such as weapon used, time and place of occurrence as well as nature of injury.
National Crime Victimization Survey use to be named the National Crime Survey. In 1973 the Bureau of Justice Statistics have given the National Crime Victimization to every household 49,000 to 77,500 twice a year. It has the ability to cover the rate of reoccurrence of crime which include the consequences and the characteristics of victimization. There are certain kinds of crimes that the NCVS highpoint information like larceny, rape, burglary and motor vehicle. Each year the United States Census randomly selects household for interviews. The Uniform Crime Report is working together with National Crime Victimization Survey. Formerly the NCVS is designed to handle account that is partially about victim information also it is about crimes that has been non reporting. The survey is the one of the
Throughout chapter 2, the main focus was types of crime and how they are reported/kept track of. In order to keep track of crime rates, Uniform Crime Reports (UCRS) and National Crime Victimization Surveys are used. Both of them have their positives and negatives. Uniform Crime Reports for instance, are beneficial because it keeps track of major crimes that have happened. It tracks the offenses such as Murder, Rape, Robbery, Assault, Burglary, Larson, and Auto Theft. Since murder is hard to get away with, it has a very accurate number when showing the statistics for that crime. On the other hand, half the crimes that happen go unreported like rape, theft, and assault. That is where the National Crime Victimization Surveys come in handy. The
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) was formulated by the federal government’s Bureau of Justice Statistics to address non-reported issues by victims in the United States, according to the textbook. Many people are victim of crimes that are not reported to the proper authorities for whatever reason. Other potential crimes are also reported to the NCVS whereas citizen was almost victimized. The crime trends are used to categorize the incident, victim, and location of the criminal act or potential harmful act.
The National Crime Victimization Survey is a yearly self-report survey that is a nationally representative sample for the United States. This is 38,000 households who are replaced every three years to different household. This is about 68,000 people. The interviews have many questions and take place twice a year.
Most individuals will experience some form of crime in their lifetime. This crime can range from civil or violent. Civil crime cases are cases that involve private citizens or companies in a dispute over money, contract agreements, divorce, child support, etc. Criminal cases are separated into three categories: infractions cases, which would consist of traffic tickets, misdemeanors cases such as shoplifting, and felony cases, which would consist of violent crimes committed against another person such as rape, domestic violence, and armed robbery.
From the day our government began to keep an accounting of criminal activity, there have been arguments over crime statistics. The Uniform Crime Report (UCR), Self-Report Surveys (SRS), and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) are three methods in which the government collects data, and monitors criminal activity in the United States. The Uniform Crime Reports, Self-Report Surveys, and the National Crime Victimization Survey each have both positive and negative attributes that have influenced different aspects of society.
IntroductionIn recent history, dating violence has become a paramount issue in American society. With the rates of domestic violence on the rise, much research has been conducted that provides evidence that violence during dating relationships in the teen years is a strong contributing factor to later domestic violence. Current research is revealing that a far larger percentage of teens are suffering from some amount of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse in their dating relationships. Studies have shown that both those who engage in the violent behaviors, as well as those who are the victims of these acts are more likely to be involved in violent relationships in the future. The significant number of individuals involved in these
man pointed a gun at the boy, the boy shot the man. Who knows what could have happened if this boy didn’t have a gun. Him and all three of his young siblings could have been shot and killed. Guns save lives, and in a nation that already has more than 200 million guns, gun control does little other than make the work of rapists, robbers, murderers and psychos easier. When faced with gun control laws, the law abiding citizen has no choice other than to disarm or become an outlaw, but people with bad intentions are faced with no such moral dilemma.
Victimology, or the study of victims, especially crime victims, has created new categories of victims that had not been previously noted. What are typically known as “street crimes”, such as rape, robbery, murder, and assault, have been identified as crimes since the biblical era, and the victims of such crimes have long been identifiable (Karmen, 2013). It has been the advances in the field of Victimology, and the questions which have been asked, that have identified new types of crime, and with these new crimes, come new types of victims. As social mores change, and new issues emerge, new categories of crime victims will be identified, and each new group of victims will present a new group of issues, which will need to be addressed. As these new groups of victims are identifies, victimologist will be tasked with asking the questions needed, so that the process of how these groups became victims, and be identified, and studied, in hopes of preventing future victimization.
In the first chapter of Capital, “Commodities Karl Marx introduces to his readers the relationships between “things” and human beings. He defined commodity as a material or a product as a way to understand how value works. His thing was to get his readers more involve in understanding that the labor of time is necessary to produce the commodity. He uses bottles and pencils as an example to explain commodities. According to Marx when embodied labor-time is measurable, it makes the creation of relative value possible.
The deviant place theory deals strictly with a specific area known as the “bad” areas. Living in a neighborhood with low income or conditions showing bad reputations exhibits big roles of said crimes and deviance. These types of neighborhoods have all kinds of individuals that move in and move out consistently. Because replacements of people occur in this location, then it “fits” the location itself as being deviant and portraying bad behaviors. These type of neighborhoods involve the poor, overcrowded, less supervised, higher conflicts, etc. – which forces individuals to manage relations with one another and to their physical surroundings of the location. (1990) This “bad” area exposes its own dangerous location and makes an individual more susceptible to becoming a victim of a crime. This victimization is not coming from the victim itself, but rather the result of being in such “bad” areas. Gangs are a great example of a deviant neighborhood that would therefore come with a greater crime rate. The only way not to become a victim of this deviant location would be to move from said