preview

Conflicted About Lying

Good Essays

Imagine coming home after a day with your friends at the mall. When your parents ask you where you where, you tell them that you were working on a school project with your friends. What did you do when you told them you were working on a project? You were lying. Lying is something everyone has done in their life. So what exactly is lying? The definition of lying is an intentionally false statement. Even keeping silent if you know something is a lie, just a different type of lie than saying something intentionally incorrect. Some people have different views on lying than others. Some people think that telling any lie is fine. Others say that lies of any kind are dishonest and should not be used. Then, there are the people that believe that …show more content…

For example, one quote that supports the claim is, “In the AP-Ipsos poll, 65 percent of those questioned said it was sometimes OK to lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings, even though 52 percent said lying, overall, was never justified.” (NBC) This shows that the majority of the people who participated in the Advanced Press poll thought that it was sometimes fine to lie, though some people disagreed on their positions. This also shows that many people can not find a definite position because the percentages must overlap, there is no way to get one-hundred seventeen percent in a poll. Another quote is, “‘Not only is lying justified, it is sometimes a moral duty,’ says Cohen. An obvious example is when you’re lying to protect someone from serious harm. ‘But much less extreme cases often call for lies,’ Cohen says.” (NBC) This shows that lying is justified in both extreme cases, like hiding Anne Frank, and lesser cases, such as protecting or defending your friend from something. This proves that it is also sometimes necessary to lie, whether it is to protect someone from severe harm, or just to prevent hurting someone's feelings. Overall, the article, It’s the Truth: Americans Conflicted About Lying, shows that lying is always justified by giving evidence through results and also …show more content…

Nobody wants to lose a friendship over being tired. Nobody wants to be told derogatory things about himself or herself. However, not only white lies are acceptable, other lies are justified to like saving somebody from severe harm. They don’t have to be innocent, you just need a acceptable reason. Radicalists on the other hand believe it is never justified to lie, no matter how extreme the case in question is. They believe that lying is mortal, and being called a liar was a terrible insult on their moral and their dignity. They also believed, and still believe, that a lie that does not really affect anything at all is still unacceptable because it “harms mankind individuality” which is a different standpoint from what is usually thought by the rest of the population. However since we grow up lying from being a toddler, it is impossible to change what we do. We all have lied and will continue to lie all our life no matter how hard we try not to. There is no way to reprogram our bodies to do something we aren’t supposed to. This counters Kant’s radicalist ideas that we should never lie. All in all, the claim that it is always justified to lie for any cause and any reason is correct as we all have started lying at a young age and is an irreversible trait we mature as we get

Get Access