Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" and Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" both attempt to provide their readers with the cruel truth regarding how it is typically human to express interest in cold-blooded acts. These two short stories discuss about people who see nothing wrong with promoting criminal behavior, but who eventually come to acknowledge the horrible position that the victim is in by experiencing it from a first-person perspective. Sanger Rainsford, and, respectively, Tessie Hutchinson are the central characters in these two stories and they are unable to complexly understand the situation that a victim is in until they actually realize that they are the victims. Reason does not emerge as an important value until the central characters realize that it is absurd for others to put across particular attitudes. Rainsford is reluctant to accept that it is wrong for him to kill animals and he simply sees his actions as a sport. Similarly, Tessie considers that it would be impossible for her to leave her home-town before getting the chance to visit the local store. This demonstrates that these two individuals fail to see matters from the perspective of someone who is threatened by his or her own actions. Even with this, Rainsford seems to be more cerebral when considering matters from this point of view, taking into account that he does not hesitate to express his horror at the thought of hunting human beings. In contrast, Tessie believes that it is very
Rainsford values human life, because when the general told Rainford that he hunts humans. Rainsford told the General that what he is doing is not hunting, what he spoke of was murder. He also is very caring. He said that he will not make him into a condone cold blooded murderer. Rainsford is also described as a mouse in the hunting game, “He didn't even have to wait long,the cat was coming to play with the mouse.
The purpose of this paper will be the comparing and contrasting of two short stories previously read and interpreted by the writer. The two stories chosen were “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell. These two stories seem to have nothing in common, as they have two separate meanings in two separate eras. However, the moral of each story draws similarity, the author’s paints a picture to keep the audience open minded therefore connecting them in distinct ways.
Curiosity wins the reader’s interest in accounts and push them to take on their engagement in the narrative. In “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, the way in which the characters talk to each other gives the reader chills and urge the reader to feel attached to the characters. Connell develops curiosity in the reader through his tone and the use of foreshadowing.
The Theme of the game rely around the justification of murder. Killing just because. Even thou man is superior over best and he has been given power since the beginning of time it does not give him the authority to take one’s life.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” author Richard Connell expertly exploits foreshadowing and vivid imagery to emphasize danger and suspense. Many authors attempt to do this, but only a small few succeed. Everyone who has stayed up past their bedtime reading a book will tell you, they stayed awake because the book they were reading was filled with suspense. It is suspense that separates the great stories from the good stories. And “The Most Dangerous Game” is definately a great one. By using foreshadowing and utilizing his characters five senses, Connell keeps readers at the edge of their seats, eagerly waiting to find out what comes next.
Much like The Lottery, The Dangerous Game starts off as a seemingly normal story and takes a turn for the
This story is a reminder of humanity and protects us in difficult times. While people read the themes such as superpowers, and the nature of evil, they are forced to think about the consequences of their actions. Furthermore, The Most Dangerous Game is a story that has resonated with readers, challenging them to human nature. Richard Connell brings together a wealth of characters, and symbols with emotions into the story, and ensures that this is as relevant. Connell shows characters like Rainsford and Zaroff that elevate the story beyond mere entertainment and invites readers to empathize with their
In the beginning of the story Rainsfordś perspective is that he is the hunter and he feels no moral obligation to the animals that he hunts. ¨Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes-the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and I are the hunters.¨ Rainsford states this to his friend Whitney before he falls off the boat and reaches Ship-Trap
Is winning the lottery meant to be fortunate and cherishing? Most would have said of course! However, sadly it is not the reality in this case scenario. In the movies “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and The Hunger Games by Gary Ross having your name being drawn is most likely one of the worst things that could happen in their small town or district. These two movies do have comparisons and differences. Both of these movies have sacrifice and tradition, on the other hand they have two extremely different protagonists known as Katniss and Tessie; which make their stories more on a distinctive perspective. “The Lottery” and The Hunger Games are similar in regards to sacrificing and traditional beliefs, although they differ by the main characters
The first similarity I am going over is the theme fear. The people if both stories feared being picked to either win the lottery, or be placed in the games. The people in The Lottery knew that if they were drawn that they would be stoned to death. The people in The Hunger Games knew that if they were picked they had a great chance of death. When death is a close option you are most likely going to have fear.
In both stories, the innocent characters were fighting death at the hands of someone who found the idea of killing another human being to be a game. In “The Lottery” the game of death consumed an innocent life solely because a few individuals founded a tradition; and in “The Most Dangerous Game” the game of death consumed an innocent life solely because one person thought it was merely entertaining. Both authors portrayed the antagonist as friendly, warm and welcoming. In the Lottery, the antagonists were the families whom participated in the drawing of a name that lead to the stoning of another family member (which may or may not be their own family member). In “The Most Dangerous Game” the antagonist was a well-off general who opened his luxurious home to guests who have gone astray from their original destination. Death is the main theme of both short stories and both authors portrayed this dark and dreary idea as a game the characters are playing.
Being an animal hunter has some big responsibilities, but rainsford was not +worried or so he thought. After days and weeks of hunting for animals, he decided that he wanted to be a serial killer. As we all know, serial killers end up in prison for a long time. Obviously, Rainsford was not worried about the consequences. Whittney tried convincing Rainsford that it was not a good idea to start killing people, so Rainsford acted like he took Whitney’s advise. Therefore, while rainsford was trying to change his ways, he had to overcome his fears of
Introduction and overview of the short stories, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell.
When specific traditions within a civilization are blindly followed, the consequences may be dire and the society as a whole can be negatively impacted. The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson both highlight the consequences that come along with condoning the traditions that were introduced into a culture. By using arbitrary rules, inequitable odds, and blindly following traditions in these pieces of literary work create an environment for a hostile social ritual and ceremony. The societies displayed in these pieces of literature share a tradition of cruel and murderous behavior which jeopardizes the livelihood of the people who reside in these areas, specifically the youth. Although both of the traditions
The Lottery by Shirley Jackson is very similar to The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. The Hunger Games is a seventy-four-year-old lottery that selects twenty-four kids, as young as thirteen, and sends them into a rink to fight to the death. The Lottery is about a lottery that has been going on for more than seventy years, where the village selects one person to stone to death. The two stories may have different plot lines, but they have similar themes, including tradition, a dystopian society, and protagonists standing up for justice. Both of these stories are very akin and hold a very harsh lesson.