preview

Compare And Contrast The American And Mary Wigman

Better Essays

Isadora Duncan and Mary Wigman both started with the same idea of dancing, and how they should incorporate human movement instead of ballet that was more unnatural to the body. Even though they had a similar thought about modern dance, they had one thing that made them very different, which was their choreography. Duncan pieces were lively and upbeat, and Wigmans were dark and mysterious. They both approached modern dance through a different eye. Even if they lived in two different parts of the world, “The American, as represented by Isadora Duncan, and the German, as represented by Mary Wigman,” (Cass 247), the world would then get two different choreographers that were evolving at the same time in history, which impacted the dance history. …show more content…

One of the philosophies they both equally shared was “to rediscover the fundamental laws of human movement, so that once again dance might become the medium for fresh artistic impulses,” (Cass 247). Both wanted to step away from the unnatural type of dancing, for example ballet, they were a strong believers that whatever the body can’t naturally do is what shouldn’t be done, hyper extending someone’s feet or legs is not normal and could bring complications to a dancer. Like also mentioned in Ragonas journal, “Duncan and Wigman give us an important cross-cultural, intercontinental vision of an aesthetic theory which strove to transform popular knowledge of the body” (48). They were big on doing baby like movements, they stopped to look at every day things that people would already do and creating it into art, that not only showed expression but sent out a message that just because a dancer can pick up their leg to their face does not make it beautiful, they managed to create a simple step into something beautiful. Without going against ballet, ballet usually denied reality, and modern dancing affirmed it. Modern creates life, you feel like ballet is this imaginary story when modern shows the experiences of the realities of life in their direct and most intensive forms. It ended up as quite a shock at the beginning when modern started implanting its seed into the …show more content…

Duncan was more for students and anyone around her to make their own movements, she didn’t really want to make up her own technique but she wanted dancers to be creative and find what they found beautiful. So the way she would do her choreography would depend on how she was feeling which led her dancing more of an expressed dance form. I guess you can see Duncan’s approach in what she wanted, was to see the dancer of the future. Although, she didn’t have any recorded choreography it was said that after the loss of her children her dances became sad and not as impressive. But if I have to answer how Duncan approached her own choreography I would say, to be free and to dance what one feels. Like mentioned by Irma Duncan in the book by The Technique of Isadora Duncan, “Isadora Duncan has said, that her dance was not of the theater, but an expression of life, and that she did not train the pupils of her school for the stage,” (ix). Wigman, also believed that expression was the key to make a good choreography but Wigmans pieces where more stable and concrete. Interested in the relationship between human being and cosmic forces, she describes her creative experience as the transformation into movement of the invisible forces that give her life. The dancer is a medium for her; dance functions as a trance, accomplishing its cathartic function recognized by archaic

Get Access