preview

Civil Disobedience In Antigone And Dr. King

Decent Essays

Antigone and Dr. King had very different ways of engaging in their own civil disobedience for something they believed was right. They both went against the law to do the right thing, but Antigone wanted to blame Creon for the law instead of blaming the law itself. In the end, it was Dr. King who had the support of others and was ultimately more effective in his fight to end segregation. From the beginning of the book it was Antigone’s mission to give her brother, Polyneices, a proper burial, but this would mean she would have to disobey the kings, Creon’s, orders. The body was to sit out while animals come devour it and no one was to touch or try any type of burial. She thought as his sister it was her duty to give her brother a proper burial …show more content…

King fought for what they believed in the only difference is that thousands of people were with Dr. King to get segregation to end while Antigone was alone in her belief that she should defy the king’s orders and bury her brother. Her own sister, Ismene, was not with her in burying their brother because it was against Creon’s orders. Ismene goes as far to say “I don’t dishonor him; but it’s impossible for me by nature to defy the citizens” (Sophocles 23). So she believes that since the king has forbidden the burial of Polyneices it would go against the law and the people to actually bury him. Unlike Dr. King, Antigone did not have the support of others in her act of civil disobedience of burying her brother. Because she did not have the support of others her method of resistance was not as effective as Dr. King. In the end she did not even get to give her brother a proper burial, she was caught before she could finish the ritual. After Creon sentenced Antigone to death, Creon’s son and Antigone’s fiancé, Haimon, went to talk to his father. Haimon informed his father that there was chatter among Thebes “that she among all women least deserves to die the evilest of deaths for deeds most glorious” (Sophocles 48). This shows that people were behind her for what she did but they were not willing to come out and defy the proclamation with her for fear of being punished like Antigone …show more content…

King states that “one has not only a legal but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (King). With this he is saying that the law of segregation is unjust and people have to fight to end it. He also says that “one who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty” (King). This is exactly what he did with his open, peaceful protests against segregation and he sat in jail in Birmingham accepting the consequences of what he did. He did all of this because he believed so much that segregation was an unjust law and that people needed to be treated equally. The reason Dr. King was so successful in his protesting and attempts to end segregation is that he had the support and help of so many others like and unlike him, who were there to do their part to desegregate. He even had the support of some church members that would, “Yes, they have gone to jail with us. Some have been dismissed from their churches, have lost the support of their bishops and fellow ministers. But they have acted in the faith that right defeated is stronger than evil triumphant” (King). The support of white and black people against segregation helped the cause because it opened peoples eyes that everyone should be treated

Get Access