Case Study: The Hat In Temple City

Ms. Juanita Machado is a Line Assembly Technician. She was employed with the insured approximately for seven months. Within the seven months, she has been with the company; she had known of the claimant, Mr. Donald Arauz after he had been hired early on last year in 2016 when he was hired to the same position that she currently holds.

Zamudio, Human Resources Administrator and acting custodian of personnel records of the Domino Realty Management Company who allowed access, and copies in support of any relevant information pertaining to any injuries, had located a “Work/School Status Report” under the name of the “Talbert Medical Group.” The document had placed the claimant off from work from 2-5-01 through 2-5-01 for pain to the claimants left knee, and yet, according to Ms. Zamudio, the document did not state that a work related injury occurred as there were no other documentation in support of an injury. Furthermore, the witnesses had not cited any job related incidents where the claimants left knee from 2001 had been injured were the alleged 2001 left knee had been irritated or exacerbated in any

During interview Ms. Stoker was alert, aware of surroundings, and answered all questions appropriately and independently. During the visit Ms. Stoker dry heaved into a garbage bucket, and visited the restroom once. The worker was at the residence for about 2 hours. Initially Ms. Stoker was shaking uncontrollable to the point of shaking the entire bed. At the end of the visit the shaking had stopped and Ms. Stoker was smiling and interaction with worker while talking about DELETEbeing a wife and mother. During visit Ms. Stoker received a call from Alacare Home Health. She informed them she was out of her pain medicine but did not inform them she was out of all medicine. Alacare called the pharmacy and was informed she did

The two witnesses say the claimant at no time demonstrated, exhibited, reported, or complained about any injuries which he has made with his specific and continuous trauma claims. Witness Gustavo said he was taken back when he received legal documentation from the claimant’s attorneys for a workers’ comp claim injuries, which he say’s never occurred.

On Monday, 11-16-2015 she recalled the claimant had punched in early for work that morning and did not say anything to her until shortly later around mid-morning when the claimant came into her office. She said the claimant was brief with her when she requested to file a Workers’ Compensation claim for her alleged right wrist injury coupled with pain to her right fingers. She claimed that her injury was work-related, and her injury occurred on 11-12-2015.

Almanza further claimed she nor her administrative staff of office employees were informed by the claimant or from the claimant’s two Supervisors, Mr. Jose Maldonado, and his brother who is deceased, Mr. Estevan Maldonado that the claimant had any internal complaints or issues. She said the claimant’s work performance was never an issue and that there was no anticipation of any pending layoffs or workplace harassment issues for any related industrial stressors. She said both brothers supervised the claimant and from her knowledge, she never received any incident reports or complaints from either Supervisors that suggested the claimant may have suffered from a slip or fall at his job where he may have injured his head or back.

On Thursday, 10/22/2015 the claimant stated he reported for work pain-free and was not suffering from any pain or discomfort from four other work related injuries that he reported as claims and received judgments. The claimant was unable to account for the real dates of his past work-related injuries that occurred between 2010 and 1/2013. The claimants past industrial-related injuries ranged from a left wrist injury, head injury and two separate right wrist injuries which he says did not include any injury to any other body parts.

PVYW was in her motel room which was booked and paid by her employer (ComCare)

Ms. Yu stated that the claimant started her employment with The Hat 9 years ago, but she did not have the claimant’s exact date of hire. She referred us to the Claims Adjuster handling this Workers’ Compensation claim that would have this information.

Based upon the circumstances and upon information and belief Brian Wilson and the employees that were interviewed believe that the panel fastener on the cream dispenser broke and a portion of the fastener went into the plaintiff’s coffee when cream was dispensed into that coffee cup.

In the late 16th century when beaver hats became a fashion statement, establishments were created to exclusively deal in furs. Serving as emblems of social status and prestige for centuries, hats were worn to identify individuals by military statuses, social rank and position, political affiliations, professions, and religious following. Regarding the Catholic religion itself, the shape, style, and material of one’s hat was a visual indication of

Were there actions that were intentional misrepresented in regards of the worker’s compensation in the summary judgement?

 Misrepresentation of claims experience. Employers hide previous claims by classifying employees as independent contractors or leased

In this report it shall be determined whether Anne Parish was an employee or an independent contractor to Ace Insurance