Workers Compensation Case Interview

Ms. Juanita Machado is a Line Assembly Technician. She was employed with the insured approximately for seven months. Within the seven months, she has been with the company; she had known of the claimant, Mr. Donald Arauz after he had been hired early on last year in 2016 when he was hired to the same position that she currently holds.

On 11/4/16, I, Account Manager Enmanuel Cabrera, was notified via email by Shift Supervisor Massiel Perez that Security Officer Bailey Forte no called no showed. S/O Forte is usually off on Fridays, but was scheduled in advance, 0200-0600, to cover the open post. S/S Perez made several attempts to call the officers from 1st shift to cover the open post, but was unsuccessful to get someone to come in. Also on 11/3, during the afternoon parking lot detail AVP1 was 1 flagger short, all vital positions where filled with the exception of the parking lot supervisor/rover. As well as on 11/4, morning parking lot detail was short 1 flagger. Daniel Canela no call no show for the AM parking lot detail. All vital positions in the parking lot were filled for the exception of the supervisor/rover position.

SC received phone call from provider Moravia home health care Sherri Hill RN. Requesting that the SC call the provider to discuss the Pa’s scare plan. SC called the provider and spoke with Sherri Hill. Sherri reported that the Pa call the office on 3/21/2016 and reported that aide/ niece Iysha Gayman did not show up for her evening shift and does not want her to work for him anymore. Sherri reported that she called Iysha to enquire about the why she did not show and informed her that the Pa does not want her to continue to work for him. The Nurse reported that Iysha became upset and used disrespectful language at that time Sherri reportedly end the call with Iysha. According to Sherri a short time after she received another call from Iysha

The two witnesses say the claimant at no time demonstrated, exhibited, reported, or complained about any injuries which he has made with his specific and continuous trauma claims. Witness Gustavo said he was taken back when he received legal documentation from the claimant’s attorneys for a workers’ comp claim injuries, which he say’s never occurred.

Tammy Fluanker, medical records personnel, offered her a new physician’s comp form to take back to the physician to reopen a claim. Ms. Waeld refused to consider

Mr. Cintron said the claimant was a full-time employee. Mr. Cintron said he did not have the claimant’s exact date of hire and did not know if the claimant had concurrent employment or outside work aside from his full-time employment with the insured.

1. Occupation and working ability of the Claimant, if this has changed, since the injury, previous occupation of the Claimant.

During the course of her employment with Winfield Security, Ms. Phillip was the victim of sexual harassment by a Winfield Security employee, by Mr. Waltz (full name currently unknown.)

Asia Walker an investigator for the Guardian law office met with Ms. Rojas, Mr.Perez and Aleena. She inspected the apartment and asked the family questions about Aleena's health, development and things they may need to better care for Aleena. Ms. Walker offered the family some advise on how to deal with DCP&P, when it comes to getting times done in a timely manner. She told Ms. Rojas , if she really feels like her case work is not doing her job than to contact her supervisor. Ms. Walk spent an hour explain her job title, the rights Aleena have and the rights of the parents.

GAO called Ms Lisa Everett. She was inquiring if her daughter, CAITLYNN, was removed from her case. She stated that received a letter from APD informing something about her SNAP, but did not understand if it was about her daughter been removed.

This role play was on November 9th, 2016 at 11:45am and Evan and I were dispatched to 123 Main street in regard to a complaint by Erica Hunt about a man, Jeff, who was hired to clean her apartment. Erica was not happy with Jeff’s cleaning job, as well as, he took a pizza and a beer. From Erica’s perspective she was very upset, and yelling at Jeff, about how she did not want to pay for his cleaning job, and wanted him out of her house. From Jeff’s perspective, he wanted to get paid and would not leave until he was paid. Unfortunately, neither Evan or I received Jeff’s last name, and did not do a CPIC check.

SC received VM from Lisa Woods scheduler at MarsCare on 2/1/2016. The VM stated that she completed her meet and greet with the Pa, his wife, herself and the worker Debbie Harris on 1/28/2016. Lisa reported that the meet and greet went well, but she has some concerns about the poor condition of Pa’s home and expressed hesitation about the aide safety. Lisa stated that the Pa’s kitchen is badly in need of repairs and the ceiling is appears to be falling down. In the VM Lisa asking the SC to verify that the home is safe for the aide to be in it. SC placed call to Lisa but VM and left a detailed message with contact information. SC then called the Pa’s to inquire about the meet and greet and if the aide is coming. The Pa reported that the aide is coming, but he’s not sure is going to work out because the worker it not the

On Wednesday July 19. 2017, @ approximately 1:55 pm there was a meeting at 1660 7th St, Santa Monica, CA 90401.The meeting was held in the second floor in conference room. The meeting was in regards to the organizational changes and other information to the supervisors staff. However, it was brought to my attention that I was personally brought up in that meeting without me being present. My coworker asks Rolando Cruz about training for supervisors in the scheduling department for a position called Scheduler. The question was asked if the scheduler position will be biddable in the upcoming bid. Rolando Cruz answered no. He further stated the only person that applied for that position was Lamicia Butler. Afterwards Cruz also stated “and she’s

This worker met with Naima at her home. Privacy practice were verbally reviewed. The interview was not recorded.

Although there are many motivational reasons for working, one can safely assume that almost every American works at a job away from home to receive money and benefits. Money yields the basic needs of clothes, food, and shelter. Money is also used to purchase transportation, insurance, health care, education, retirement, and entertainment. Given that a worker’s job is a vital means to secure the necessities of life, it is essential that the worker or the worker’s family is compensated when a job related injury, illness, or death occurs. Government legislation requires employers to provide a reasonable safe place to work and holds most of them responsible for work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths ( ).