Grandel Group LLC would like to request a full refund and complimentary service due to events that took place on April 15th, 2016. On this day, your café was under contract to cater for Grandel Group LLC. Although the food that was delivered was delicious, the agreement was not completely fulfilled.
To elaborate, your café was under contract to serve breakfast, lunch, and a dinner to my firm on the day of April 15th, 2016. The contract that was agreed upon is on the following page. A USB drive containing security pictures and video clips of what was delivered on that day is also enclosed in the envelope. The pictures and videos are also digitally time stamped. Instead of being given a three-course meal, Grandel Group LLC was given only 1 meal and an appetizer-worth of extras for our 30 employees. Had this been desired, one of our employees could have gone to the local Costco to pick up food instead of spending $3,450 for your café’s meals and services.
Along with what was on the contract, a café employee verbally told Grandel Group LLC that each meal would be setup and served in our conference room. Utensils were to also be provided as well. After all the contents of the boxes were emptied, I had personally called your café to discuss what had been delivered and the service given. After much waiting, an employee picked up and stated
…show more content…
Due to all the breaches in our contractual agreement with one another, Grandel Group LLC deems this to be a reasonable request. I hope that future contractual agreements with your establishment will be fulfilled wholly. Grandel Group LLC understands that mistakes can occur to any business and we are willing to look past this mistake so that we may do business in the future. Some form of communication (email, call, etc.) no later than a week from the 19th of April 2016 would be greatly
The court decided that their needed to be further proceedings for Maureen Davis under negligence and the Alabama State law of having sufficient evidence against Hardees restaurant under Flagstar who didn’t have a strong enough backing or argument to defend that fact that there
Gene and Martha Jannusch owned and operated Festival Foods, a concessions truck that sold food at events. The Jannusches orally contracted with Lindsey and Louann Naffziger to sell Festival Foods for $150,000. The Naffzigers paid $10,000 immediately and planned to pay the remainder after obtaining a loan. The Naffzigers took possession but later backed out of the agreement. The Jannusches sued for breach of contract. Louann acknowledged that there was an oral agreement, but Lindsey testified that the $10,000 payment was for the option to purchase the business later. Lindsey admitted to taking possession of Festival Foods, receiving income, purchasing inventory, and paying expenses. Nevertheless, the Naffzigers returned the truck and trailer
No one remembers serving the plaintiff on the morning of the alleged incident. The Ishpeming Restaurant has two creamer machines. It appears that the cream dispenser, which is described as a model skmcd1p Silver King Refrigeration Unit was the cream dispenser, which was utilized on the date of the incident. The alleged incident occurred at approximately 7:30 am on April 28, 2014. The plaintiff allegedly ordered a cup of coffee with cream at the
Pursuant to 19 CFR 174, a protest is being filed on behalf of the importer of record, Schlosser Forge Company. The refund amount requested is $47.81 in duties previously paid. Expeditors is acting on behalf of the importer pursuant to a power of attorney.
General Manager (GM) Mr. David Smith reported that the claimant was a full-time employee and was assigned to The Hat’s Temple City restaurant where she was hired as a Food Service Worker on 5-31-2012. Mr. Smith alleged that the claimant performed a “variety” of duties, which were similar, or the same as other co-workers who worked with her at The Hat in Temple City, CA.
Contrary to the defendant’s representation, the income from Alligators Fast Food was always not sufficient to support the family expenses of the plaintiffs [pg97, line 10 to17, NOE]. Defendants accept them kept shop’s cash income in their hand[page 84,line 10 to 19,NOE; pg97, line 10 to17, NOE ; pg193,h ,BD],No living expenses were paid from
again from a firm that has given them poor service and that it costs businesses between 3 and 10 times less to
Farnum Enterprises, LLC, a business entity based in New Jersey formed in 2015. It's business intent solely on Proverbs 27:17, “As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” It is this Kingdom principle in which the Iron Sharpens Iron [I.S.I.] Project is conceptualized.
This report examines the nature and evaluation of Burger Ranch’s further demands of monetary compensation for their lost profits of six months.. The purpose of this report is to provide you with the necessary legal and statistical information in deciding the most effective course of action with regards to the recovery of lost profits owed to Burger Ranch.
In involving Gary and the restaurant here there are causes of actions against both of them. Gary was acting as an agent for the restaurant to apparent authority to do the hiring as the Executive Chef. Therefore, by either word or action, causes a third-party reasonably to believe that the agent has the authority to act, even though the agent has no express or inferred authority. However, Jay was promised the job by Gary, to be promoted as the restaurant Pastry Chef. Once, Gary was hired as the Executive Chef for the restaurant it was no longer an agreement to give Jay the job. Gary determine that the agreement was off and he would delay the message by a voice message left on Jay answer machine. In the message Gary went on to say Jay was
Upon investigation, I have found that there reimbursement request of the previous associate has been denied. Also, the according to the report provided for that reimbursement they informed us that the damage weas not damaged. However, when I checked all the reports in your account especially the customer sales report
The level of which Baker knows his team varies from ‘word on mouth’ and reputation, from prior conflicts and to prior effective working relationships. Given that the group members don’t know each others well, and/or are competing, Baker will have a tougher task to bring the team together
Grand Jean then immediately terminates the relationship, and does not try to aid its contractors in any way that we have noticed. This is a waste of invested time and resources in the relationship, which could be easily avoided by closer collaboration and communication, combined with more a more flexible framework. The existing facilities are not used for a period of time; which is an additional waste of resources.
Until early 2012, Mr. Abdallah Bazbaz (the guarantor) had a property manager who rented the parking spaces for a fixed monthly payment of $3,500. The property manager was responsible for renting the parking spaces, and for the collection of rent. However, since the property manager left in early 2012, the