In this report, it will analyses the building structure and envelope of an advanced engineering building at UQ. The report will put the emphasis on some aspects which include the construction documentation, building configuration building element design and building loading and load transfer to the foundation. From another perspective, the report will also illustrate the project’s sites structure which includes site conditions, material used, interfaces with pre-existing structure/infrastructure. Basically, by using various of site or the whole building drawings, some significant building components can be recognized. These building components will be discussed and analyzed specifically, which include their particular location in the drawing and how they function in the building structure. Introduction of this building The building is located in Brisbane QLD; the area is about 18000.0 m2. The project was finished in 2013. The building has achieved certified 5 star green ratings representing ‘Australian Excellence’ in environmental initiatives. Also, to achieve the goal of energy efficiency, some building service and feature have been improved. For example, the thermal labyrinth to store cool overnight, VSD fans and pumps, high performance double glazing and openable louvres and windows with cross -flow via the atrium. Construction documentation The construction documentation is consisting of structural and architectural cover sheets. The structural section can be
To begin, after the site has been chosen several lengthy steps must follow, the site location meets all regulatory, environmental, historical and municipal zoning requirement approvals. Additionally, the property on which the tower will be constructed must be free and clear of all encumbrances and mortgages usually 100’ x 100’ square foot area of property. When all those steps are successfully completed and approved the construction can now move forward with a notice to proceed. There will be a site visit organized for the bidding process inviting pre-approved contractors, civil engineers,
This fire station build in 1993 has a form that resemblance Ringwood Library with a reverse curved roof acting in lieu of a dome to render the building monumental (Annex J). This time it was marked with a series of tubular skylights and vents which serves as a dome lanterns. Cream colour brick wall covers the façade of this building as a shell of a core of local red brick and concrete columns architecture internally which was a legacy of Melbourne’s everyday warehouse and factory architecture of the 1920s. The design had 2 constraints that Corrigan had to consider. Firstly the garage, reception area and dormitory had to be squeeze side by side within a tight space along Albert Street. Second the building was a replaced of an earlier fire station by Seabrook and Fildes whom was Melbourne’s leading early modernist and it was also near to two Modern cinemas.
The building was originally constructed in 1974 and was renovated in 2013. The building nowadays is a typical sample of green building with all new mechanical, electrical, plumbing and data systems. It is designed to make it one of the most energy efficient office buildings in the country. The owner of the project is United States General Services Administration. The work was completed by a custom integrated team of Cutler Anderson Architects as the design excellence architect, SERA Architects as the executive and interior design architect, and Howard
function of the new building is to provide office space for software development and testing of
The UniSA's School of Law is a heritage building with important historical value. It was built in 1940-41 for the administrative headquarters of the South Australian Brewing Company. In 1956, extensions were added to the original building. The Georgian style of the building, was designed by the architect F Kenneth Milne, who chose clay brick masonry as the material for the structure (Adelaide City Heritage 2015).
Established in 2015, the GCI is built on a constructed site, nestled within and spilling out from the footprint of the well-established Steele Building. Designed as a living element of the natural world, the GCI seeks to work with the environment and “operate[s] as a zero-energy and carbon neutral workplace” (HASSELL Studios 2016, paragraph 2). The green ethos extends to the use of recycled and recyclable materials and is constructed with the limited palette of geopolymer concrete, black steel, glass and wood. Built into a gentle slope, the building consists of 5 levels: the basement, embedded within the earth; level one, nestled into the slope; and levels two, three and four designed as mezzanines with learning spaces wrapping around the central atrium (Figure 2). The GCI represents a carefully orchestrated architectural system with a sense of immateriality that blurs the boundaries between inside and out, and promotes a strong connection to the natural world. Although enveloped by structures, the atrium’s three storey green wall, bio-retention basin and abundance of natural light maintains the relationship with the nature. The GCI expresses the characteristics of tectonics and stereometrics in its construction methods, use of light, load transfer and
The original renovation had a budget of 5 million dollars, which included classrooms, a computer lab, student lounge, lavatories, and staff offices. The renovation is suitable for the current status of Construction Science; however the growing program will soon outgrow the building. For these reasons, I am writing a follow up memo of the topics to be included in my upcoming researched recommendation report.
Applying the knowledge gained from Units 1 & 2 is the purpose of Unit 3. Each sheet is explained in greater detail to determine the architect’s intent and the carpenter will answer questions based on this information. In addition, the sheets contained in the mechanical, electrical and plumbing sections are reviewed, but not to the degree
Procedure __________________________________________________________5 3. Finding _____________________________________________________________5 3.1. Construction methodology of Burj Khalifa______________________________5 3.1.1. Architectural design_____________________________________________5 3.1.2. Structural Analysis_____________________________________________5 3.2 Tower Wind Behaviour______________________________________________6 3.3 Tower Foundations__________________________________________________6 3.4 Concrete Technology________________________________________________6 3.5 Elevators and Lifts___________________________________________________7 4.
A 5 storey carpark with a 600 car capacity will also be built to accommodate visitors and staff alike. The Sports Complex on the other hand, will be very professionally furnished and supplied with the latest in exercise equipment for the users’ benefit. An Olympic sized outdoor swimming pool will also be built, which can even be used in local water sports events. Duo Designers are the interior designers of choice who will be engaged in the project.
Environmentally sustainable city has been Adelaide City Council’s priority vision and by 2012, carbon emissions have reduced by 60%.1 A city that continues to adapt to climate change, utilizes water and energy efficiently, maintains the natural resources wisely and reduces waste is quite a great challenge for local council.2 However, effective strategies do help in achieving their vision. In August 2004, Adelaide City Council and the State Government of South Australia launched a single-stage national housing competition called The Adelaide Affordable Eco-Housing Competition. The winning scheme of this competition is designed by Troppo Architects, providing 26 apartments and a cafe as shown in Fig. 1. This eco-housing is now located on the south-east corner of Whitmore Square which is just few steps away from bus stops, eateries and markets while the free public bus service is provided within the city.3
The planning conditions state the height of the proposed building should be no higher than 12m above ground level for this project. The development should be housed in one building but with the different sections operating independently. There is no access is required between the independent sections. Separate entrances are required for deliveries/visitors and Siemens are keen that clients, visitors and deliveries can distinguish between the office area and the warehouse space. Siemens are also keen that any proposals are cost effective, have an appropriate quality of specification. Siemens are interested in sustainable construction approaches.
Green Building, is a Brisbane based engineering firm and our ethos is formed around sustainable and affordable development.
The quarter of the EBS building association Linz was awarded and funded by the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology
1. Assistant Professor, Nehru School of Architecture, NGI, Kuniamuthur, Coimbatore, TN, E-mail: ashimamaria@gmail.com / 8754264707