When I was a kid, my mother would read me short excerpts from the children’s book, Book of Mormon Stories. Each chapter provides a simple story that explains the happenings at the time of the prophets of old. To appeal to children, the stories are simple and explain the important gospel principles such as following the commandments, and being kind to others. I remember my mother would always read my siblings and me the story of Korihor each year before we started a new school year. When I was younger, I will admit that this did not come across as having any significance. As I have studied the scripture in far more depth, the parallels between Korihor’s influence and the influence of the adversary in our day are shockingly clear. After studying …show more content…
This principle stated a little less directly within the scriptures but I gathered it between the lines. The chapter explains how there were many laws regarding what the people could and could not do in the cities, but none of them ruled against preaching opinions to the public. Although it was a disruption to the peace of the city, no officials in the land of Zarahemla had any authority to punish Korihor for his actions as is stated in Alma 30 verse 12, “and the law could have no hold upon him.” As a result, I drew a parallel to today’s society. We act on faith that everything we learn is true, but we have no grounds to say that our beliefs are more credible than those of anyone else. Because of this, these scriptures really served as a reminder to me that we all must be accepting and respectful of what other people might believe if we expect to get any sort of equal recognition. I have found that the biggest mistake we can make as members of the church is being the source of contention during a conversation regarding religion, and this almost always comes as a result of being defensive or slow to accept someone else’s point of view. 3 Nephi 29 explains that when we act with contention, we are being led by the adversary, “he that hath the spirit of contention is not of me, but is of the devil, who is the father of contention, and he stirreth up …show more content…
The devil literally took over Korihor in this chapter and acted through his mortal being, using many deceptive techniques and strategies as Elder Benson and Mormon warn of. I think the most effective argument that the adversary used against the people of Zarahemla was that they were in bondage to the Lord, their prophets, and the church. Now, thousands of years later, the devil uses the same argument against Christ’s followers and he still has success. The main parallel I make to the “bondage” we are now in, would be the Word of Wisdom and some of the commandments. A huge source of the confusion people have for why we are members of the church is from the misconception that restricting rules and guidelines bind us from doing what we want. Most members can bear testimony to the fact that we are far from bondage, and instead more free because of the guides prophets give us. In the story, Korihor was successful in turning the hearts of many people away from the Lord as he confused them into
The intercalary chapters in The Grapes of Wrath, also known as 'inner chapters,' are the chapters that do not concern the Joads directly, but provide some sort of indirect commentary on their struggles. The intercalary chapters are a literary device designed to show the general social and economic elements of America at the time. Steinbeck uses this device to show his belief that the story is not limited to the tale of the Joads only, but an entire mass of migrants. The interchapters predict events and sometimes explain the events of that specific time period, and then the following chapter describes the previously mentioned concept in specific relation to the Joad family.
Steinbeck decided to write his novel The Grapes of Wrath by using intercalary chapters. This method of writing was a good idea on Steinbeck’s part for both the reader and the novel itself. The ways in which this was successful is that it slows down the story, gives readers the chance to make connections, gives readers a better visual for the following chapter and depicts the most important parts. Although, intercalary chapters can also have a downfall to the book. One of them is that it does not progress the story of the Joad’s and instead interrupts their journey with the unnecessary historical and social backgrounds.
1) What do we learn about Atticus Finch, his children and the town of Maycomb in the first chapter?
Throughout Malcolm Gladwell book, David and Goliath: Underdog, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants, Gladwell overall point focus on the idea that something that first appears to be a huge weakness can actually be a great advantage. For each chapter of the book he uses this idea and applies it to his different beliefs. In chapter seven he believes that because of the correlation between the legitimacy of authority and falling crime rate, huge displays of power isn’t always the best option to decrease crime rates. Gladwell begins the chapter by mentioning the Troubles, a time when the relationship between the Catholics and Protestants was at its worse and the two groups were constantly bombing and rioting each other. As a way of handling
Craig Mullaney definitely made many challenges for himself and accepted challenges from others with no questions asked. Being the thriving Valedictorian of his high school class and earning other prestigious accolades he stood out from the other entire student. But at West Point, Mullaney would be intertwined with hundreds of other classmates with the same, if not more achievements, making it seemingly impossible to be any kind of a predominant student.
This quote represents what God/Jesus was trying to teach about morality and ethics in this passage. Many people in today’s world are putting more of their focus toward following their own traditions, ideas, and rules instead of following the 10 commandments that God gave us. Although human tradition may play an important role in your life, it should never overpower God’s rules. If you constantly say that you are a devoted follower of God, then you need to represent that in your words and actions every day of your life by following the rules that God has given us to live
One of the largest struggles for members in the church is animosity of non-members. On one hand, many express their dislike of the LDS church without even knowing what Sacrament Meeting is or the full the title of the “Mormon church” (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints). On the other hand, there are a number supposed experts about Mormon doctrine. Some have belonged to the Church themselves at one point, leaving after finding unresolved dissonance between their beliefs and the Gospel. Others are often learned scholars, criticizing the Mormon doctrine to prove their own views. The following paper involves the latter of the two in an analysis of Ezekiel 37:15-17, a Biblical scripture that the LDS Church believes to refer to The Book of Mormon.
Christian initially accepts this suggestion, for he is told by Mr. Worldly-Wiseman that Legality is a man who is known for his good works (Bunyan, 19). Christian them embarks on the trip to the Village of Morality, but in transit he encounters a hill that proved an insurmountable obstacle, along with the reappearance of Evangelist who shames him for trusting in the earthly qualities of morality and legality (Bunyan, 20-22). Therein we see confirmation of the notion that justification is by faith alone. For Christian, via the instruction and teachings of Evangelist, discards the knowledge and virtues of the concepts of morality and legality as nothing more than a fruitless diversion in comparison to seeking the Celestial City (Bunyan, 22).
The unconventionally written intercalary chapters of Steinbeck's novel, “The Grapes of Wrath”, are designed to show the readers a view of economic depression and social aspects of America during this time period. Steinbeck tells the reader about the situation through a macroscopic point of view, when he writes the intercalary chapters. It is through these intercalary chapters that Steinbeck tells us about the struggle of many migrant farmers who are pushed out of their homes and start to live their lives on the road, while trying to find places for them to work. Between each of these intercalary chapters are narrative chapters where Steinbeck gives the readers a microscopic view of the situation, by giving us an example of one of the migrant
"But I say, walk by the Spirit and do not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh; for these are opposed to each other, to prevent you from doing what you would. But if you are led by the Spirit you are not under the law."
One of the stories that caught my attention was the Helzer brothers’ story because it happened locally. The older of the two Helzer brothers, Glenn (a.k.a. Taylor) Helzer, was the one that was in charge. He attended a “brainwashing” seminar known as “Harmony” training. After the training, he “decided that God had put him on earth to take over the Mormon church and become its true prophet” (Rich 32). Then he convinced Dawn Godman to attend a “Harmony” training. To illustrate, Dawn Godman, who was a roommate of the Helzer brothers, was “… a depressive, overweight woman …” (Rich 32). Godman was in a depressive state, which made her vulnerable and seeking a sense of purpose, which led to Taylor controlling her psychologically. The Helzer brothers and Godman abducted an elderly couple for money and killed them; in addition, killed several other people. Godman continued to follow the Helzer brothers and commit these heinous crimes because her life had purpose which was being a “disciple” to Taylor. Later, David Sullivan, an investigator, took part in the “Harmony” trainings to gain Godman’s trust. During Godman’s hearing, Sullivan showed her a hand signal which meant “… he was a trusted, heart connection” (Rich 36). Sullivan helped Godman finally realize that Taylor was not a prophet and her purpose was not to be his “disciple.” Godman, herself, ultimately, came back to reality and testified against the
Prometheus is an important person in Greek mythology because he gives the Greeks some of the valued necessities of life. He did many things in his life, according to the Greeks; he gave them fire after Zeus had taken it away from humans. Prometheus was commonly known as a clever trickster for the tricks he played on others. Overall he was a great hero that gave humans a couple of the very important things needed in life. His story is full of adventure and he shows a lot of courage. He also helps show what was important to the Greeks and what was valued like fire and intelligence.
“Indian Camp” by Ernest Hemingway and “Two Words” by Isabel Allende both exhibit the nine aspects of literature. In “Indian Camp” the themes, characters, and descriptions sound naive and childish. “Two Words” takes a more complex approach to these topics. Hemingway's “Indian Camp” features simpler themes and characters than Allende's
Religious texts have been one of the main sources for laws and social customs since the conception of organized religion. Each religious text provides its followers with a code of conduct they are expected to apply to themselves, their actions, and their institutions. This code of conduct applies to the individual, as well as to the government and society to within which the people exist, and ultimately defines what a "just society" is in the context of that religion. Using stories and proverbs this code of conduct, and thus "just society", is not only set, but also shown in examples. In The Bible, the essence of a "just society" is laid out within passages that serve as "the laws", including Deuteronomy, and the Psalms,
Over the past few weeks, I have noticed growth in awareness and understanding towards becoming a culturally responsive teacher. This includes me learning more about the many aspects and influences on what makes a teacher truly culturally responsive and developing on the knowledge that I already had.