preview

Australia Critical Analysis

Decent Essays

primarily about US-China relations and the role Australia would play in any conflict between the two powers. The journal article is highly critical of neoconservatism as a political ideology and views neoconservatism as an ideology that is likely to cause the escalation of war between the two nations. He gives three primary reasons for this belief. The first is the neoconservative push for strategic encirclement in the region, Secondly the neoconservative belief that the United States should prepare for war against China, and lastly supporting Taiwan’s independence instead of the “One China” policy. Some may be critical of Pan’s views on this topic since he is attempting to blame conflict between the inevitability of conflict between our nations on one political ideology, neoconservatism, but Pan goes onto explain that many of these neoconservative views are actually shared by liberals as well. Neoconservatives have essentially codified the idea that US-China conflict in East Asia is inevitable into foreign policy. Pan goes on to explain what he would suggest for Australia in case a war breaks out between The United States and China. While Pan is concerned with Australian foreign policy, his views on the US-China relationship are still astute. He believes that if neoconservative ideas continue to hold sway over US foreign policy with China, conflict will occur. President Trump has already questioned the “One China” policy, threatened China over the South China Sea, and attempted to strong-arm China over North Korea. It is clear that even if neoconservatism does not have a place in the White …show more content…

The journal article starts off by stating the conclusion that they do not believe conflict between The US and China is inevitable or even probable. This is based on their conclusion that United States deterrence efforts

Get Access