Arguments About The Excess Of Violence In Movies

Being exposed to violence can lead to warlike behaviors. In the article Violence in Movies: Cinematic Craft or Hollywood Gone Too Far?,“Researchers have found tremendous evidence supporting a link between exposure to violence in media and behavior in children”(29,

The main purpose of the article written by Gerald Jones is to change the public perception of violent media for kids. He argues for this by saying violent media can actually have positive effects on young people because a violent media help the young people to gain self-knowledge and sense of potency through heroic combative storytelling. In addition to this, when young people are growing, watching a media action full pool of blood, killing, stabbing, screams of agony and pleas for mercy help them pull out of the emotional trap by plunging themselves into violent story. Jones also believes that violent media are a positive influence on children because pretend to have a superhuman power helps children defeat the feeling of impotent that inescapably

Point 1 - The author makes claims that violent media is actually a good thing for children to be exposed to. Jones even goes into detail about how his childhood was saved by being exposed to violent media, while keeping him away from it was making him lonely. Jones says, “ They were good for me because they were juvenile. And violent.”,

This is because they view it all the time, so it becomes commonplace to where they are no longer affected by it. This can cause them to embrace these acts, which can lead to them becoming aggressive. The disadvantages of adolescents being desensitized to violence are being less likely to help someone in a life-threatening situation, lack of empathy and encouraging violent behaviors. This is supported by Sullivan, stating “ The media’s influence on young people is arguably the most corrosive of all factors cited and by far the most difficult to contain.” (Sullivan 619). This shows that not only is the media a dominating force, it’s detrimental and problematic to contain and refrain from. When children are watching cartoons like Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner and the popular Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles; where the characters blow each other up with TNT and fight with swords and daggers, they are not wincing at the mayhem, instead they’re laughing and applauding the antics because they think it’s funny and cool. Because their children seem to be entertained, parents are not intervening for the reason that their kids now have something to occupy their time. As a result, this may send mixed signals to adolescents causing them to believe that these outrageous acts are

In his essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids”, comic book writer Gerard Jones argues that there are some benefits of exposing your children to a violent content. Back in the day, children have access to different media entertainments, which mostly were violent. Violent issues can rise from the community, poverty and so fourth. Jones thinks that violent media helps children’s attitude and perceptions in their life in a good way. Jones says,” children use violent stories to meet their emotional and developmental needs”(10).

Bushman, Jamieson, Weitz, and Romer explore whether or not the presence of guns in PG-13 rated movies has increased throughout the years. In their research, they learn that the rate of gun violence in PG13 movies has indeed grown to surpass the rate of gun violence in R-rated movies. The authors demonstrate that youth now have more access to movies showing gun violence, suggesting that this could potentially have an effect on youth aggression.

The article is an argument that supported the continued exposure of children to violent media

According to Gerard Jones’s “ Violent Media Is Good For Kids,” violent media indeed has a remarkable influence upon the minds and general growth patterns of children. Jones argues that violent media can actually have positive effects on young people.

Jones uses real-life scenarios as examples to support his claim. Jones argues that if kids are not exposed to violent media, it can do more harm than good because kids thinking and reasoning is unrealistic. In his article Jones states “modern kids are far more likely to grow up too passive, too distrustful of themselves, too easily manipulated”. He wants to alert parents and opens their eyes to the negative effects by confusing kids about “their natural aggression in the same way the Victorians confused their children about their sexuality”. Jones’s comparison between the Victorians confusion their kids about their own is not effective in conveying his argument. Jones does not elaborate on what happened to the Victorians kids and how this impacted them in a negative way. In this part of his article, Jones fails to get his argument across by not provide enough information of the negative effects of the comparisons he states.

In “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Gerard argues that, violent media is not necessarily harmful to kids, rather very essential and of great importance to them and their future lives.

Boys who watch films with violence included in them are likely to see older males with guns and behaving violently. This type of behavior in a film can influence the behavior of boys as they age. Violence becomes acceptable because it is promoted in the culture and is considered by people to be normal. ​The people who participate in gun violence might have grown up with issues at home, and may not be mentally ill.

The media has a way of influencing people of all ages. Specifically, violence and horror in the media are the most debated. Why do people go to watch violent movies or horror movies? They go for entertainment without realizing the physical or mental effects. Kathy Benjamin’s “5 Scientific Ways Watching Movies Effects You” and Bernie DeGroat’s “Scary Movies Can Have Lasting Effects on Children and Teens” both mention the negative effects of movies, especially horror movies, with research or studies. However, only one of the essays, “5 Scientific Ways Watching Movies Effects You,” mentions some positive effects. Statistics have shown that watching these type movies can have short and long term repercussions.

Research shows gun violence appears in movies can lead children to obtain aggressive behavior (Bushman 2013: 1017). In high-grossing movies, violence contents display more than twice in one hours (Cieply 2013). Furthermore, perpetrators have seen to dress up as some characters in movies ( Bushman 2013: 1015). James Holmes dressed

Over the past two decades, hundreds of studies have examined how violent programming on TV affects children and young people. While a direct "cause and effect" link is difficult to establish, there is a growing consensus that some children may be vulnerable to violent images and messages.

In the book Critique of Violence ,author Walter describes Violence as "The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, male development, or deprivation .The violence that is portrayed in the media has been debated for decades ,and it has rose a question about how does it influence the youth?. From movies to video games society has been accustom to seeing violence in their everyday entertainment. Since children are easy to be influence by their environment, it is safe to say that violence in the media can and will contribute to violent behavior.