First and foremost, I want to talk about our justice system. I am really amazed on how our justice system has advanced in the past eighty years. According to the article written by Bruce Horovitz and Yamiche Alcindor for USA Today, the worker today can protest legally for a higher wage when they are earning eight dollars per hour. If we go back to the 1930s when John Steinbeck set his tragic The Grapes of Wrath, it would be a lot different. By reading his magnificent piece of art, you would know that workers at that time in California were in terrible condition. Sometimes they can’t even feed themselves after a whole day of hard work. Their employer treated them like animals because there were hundreds of hungry worker still waiting to get the job. The worker was at such a low social status because they can be replaced so easily. To the capitalist, workers are just working machines. But nowaday, everything changed. After American first minimum wages law was established in 1938 by President Roosevelt and the Congress, the U.S. government announced solemnly to all the workers who were being exploited by their employer that they will earn $0.25 per hour ($3.85 in 2017 dollars, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). With minimum wages, thousands of worker starting to have enough money to their feed themselves and their family. Just like President Roosevelt once said: “No business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to
The criminal justice system is composed of three parts – Police, Courts and Corrections – and all three work together to protect an individual’s rights and the rights of society to live without fear of being a victim of crime. According to merriam-webster.com, crime is defined as “an act that is forbidden or omission of a duty that is commanded by public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law.” When all the three parts work together, it makes the criminal justice system function like a well tuned machine.
When Daniel Alejandrez was a young boy, he noticed his father bowing his head to a superior and thought to himself that he would never do that. The reason behind this was anger. Fast forward to around the age of seventeen, he and a few fellow coworkers had noticed that they were being paid four times less than his older coworkers who were using machines and not their bare hands. On the radio, a voice called “You must organize. You must seek justice. You must ask for better wages.” The voice was Cesar Chavez. With this quote in mind, he and his coworkers went on strike against the contractor and they raised the wages from $1.65 to $1.95. The point was not to raise wages, but to call attention to the unfair treatment that they were enduring.
The main role of the courts is to interpret and apply the law. In terms of a criminal justice process the court serves as the place in which a trial is heard and a sentence decided.
The early 19th century in America saw the rise of industry and a booming economy, however, with industry came businessmen who saw an opportunity for power and profit. Even with help from the government, it would be a long time before the American people saw an improvement in the condition of the laborers and the regulation of corporations. Fast forward to the 21st century; two hundred years have passed and people are still struggling at the hands of a corporation-run economy. Throughout history, American laborers have been at the mercy of an industry controlled by a small few that did not have the best interest of the people in mind.
There are three significant issues concerning law enforcement, namely enacting the law, police discretion, and assessment of criminal behavior. Different entities create and enact laws that are specific for the societies those laws represent.
Parents have always told their kids to stay out of trouble like do not hang out with the wrong group of people. You will never know when they commit to do something stupid and you are going to go down the death row with them, being what it is called ''accomplice.'' But, when these kids do get in trouble with the law, they are sent to Juvenile Justice Centers (like prison for adolescences) in hopes of changing their character before reaching adulthood. However, the reality of these centers are the opposite around and is doing more harm than the actual good. That is why I believe Juvenile Centers are not beneficial for troubled teens. Here are a few reasons why.
America prides itself in the freedom offered to her citizens, the promise of prosperity, protection, and justice. She has laws in place for the common good, police to ensure that her people are safe and not hurting each other. There are courts for those that are accused of breaking the law, and justice is served here. Or is it? Some of society believes that the criminal justice system is unjust towards men of African decent.
On 01/02/2017 at about 1330 hours, Officer Ramirez and I were dispatched to 6546 Casamar Street in reference to a Custody Issue.
Today we are talking about if juvenile justice systems are beneficial or not. In my opinion I think they are because the correctional officers are always trying their best to let these kids have another chance to change their lives. In addition people might say that if you put a juvenile in a justice system that it won’t make a difference but I don’t think so. They actually have proof that the kids do change. According to the article “Character-building, not jail time, in a Texas juvenile court program” it states “the program is about more than simply telling the boys to stay out of trouble. He and his team teach the boy’s life lessons about accountability, respect, responsibility and empathy.” Which is stating that even
When it comes to the United States, (U.S), the majority of the American people love their seconded amendment rights. As stated in the textbook, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System by J. Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, the second amendment of the United States Constitution, for the most part, protects the U.S. citizens rights to “keep and bear arms” (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 167). That being said, each state in the U.S. will vary in their firearms laws. For instance, some states make it easier for their residence to purchase or use a firearm; other states may have stricter laws that require a more scrutinized screening process. To be more specific, most states vary in elements, such as the exceptions to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, the waiting period on purchasing firearms; if someone needs a license to own or purchase a gun; if registration is required; and if a record of the firearm sales is sent to the local police. Other factors that will differ from state to state would include, if some firearms are permitted or not allowed to be sold or owned by a state, the concealed carry laws, hunter protection laws; range protection laws, and finally, not all states have firearm injury lawsuit preemption.
In order to keep a safe society, it is important to establish a nation with
Looking into criminal justice procedure, many administrations are at work. Starting with the police, to the courts and concluding in corrections. Though all these sectors have different tasks, their combined focus is processing the law. Regardless what the process is called criminal justice will continue to serve with discretion, conviction, and correction. When first presented with the question whether criminal justice is a system, non-system, and network I leaned toward a network. Throughout our discussions, lectures, and readings I felt the process presented itself as a network. Intertwined divisions working for a common goal. Further into my research and help from Webster, I decided that the criminal justice
or she did not nee to record it. If the Government do succeed in the
The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it’s not just a punishment for those criminals who commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection, hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some say it helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an execution, but it has caused many issues for families.
The death Penalty is a very controversial topic to many. Some believe that the death penalty should not only be in place but there should be more executions every year. While others believe that the death penalty is going out of style and it is not serving its purpose of deterring crime as it did before. Although there are many claims supporting both sides still over half of Americans are for capital punishment in some way, but what causes someone to be sentenced to death? According to the article “Against the American System of Capital Punishment” by Jack Greenberg the worst crime is, “a putative killer of one’s parent or child” (Greenberg). What makes this the worst crime? And out of the few executions are these the only people getting