Are Gender Segregated Schools Better Than Co-Ed Schools?

From approximately 1000-1600 ce knights and samurai existed in Europe and Asia. Although they were around the same time period they were different. Knights were the European warriors and the samurai were the Japanese warriors. Although they are both warriors their codes and the way of preparing for battle were different. The similarities may look like they are great but there are small specific differences between the knights and samurai.

There are multiple reasons why Kelley King, Michael Gurian and Kathy Stevens are on the pro side. For one reason, they believe that the differences exist due to boys being more interactive with certain topics and methods that don’t usually interest girls or vice versa. For example, the Wamsley Elementary School in Rifle, Colorado has both boy and girl students. However, in the past, the girl students over accomplished the boy students due to the school staff being more experienced in understanding how to teach girls than understanding how to teach boys. So, the school focused on teaching the boys with their own learning styles that are also girl friendly such as online courses. The result of this was successful as boys became more accomplished than they were from before. (Pages 147 – 148).

This would likely promote and encourage higher levels of female participation inside and outside of the school environment as well as throughout their lifetimes.

What’s in everyone's mind is if this technique of having single sex classes would work? “Only 59% of girls in mixed classes were scored as proficient, while 75% of girls in single-sex ones achieved proficiency. Similarly, 37% of boys in coeducational classes scored proficient, compared with 86% of boys in all-boys classes.” (Hutchison 9) When they tried out single sex classes they got positive results. There was a huge difference between single sex classes, and coeducational classes. By viewing the end results it is pretty obvious to see that single sex classes are way more effective than coeducational classes.This will obviously help students become high caliber students in order for them to be ready for college. I believe that students would do way much better in school by having them take single sex classes. This may also affect the days that increase or it may not, due to the coeducational classes we have in public schools. The AUHSD needs to understand that in order to help their students become successful, they need to be willing to do anything in order to make that happen. Which means that they can increase days or separate male and female in order to make them successful and prepared for college. The only negative thing about this is that students might be used to single sex classes , and they might be forced into taking coeducational classes once

the first things we as a society need to confront is two truths that I think our largely mollycoddling society tries vehemently deny. The first being that boys and girls are different and that gender is not a social construct, it's a biological one. Boys are naturally wired to want to move around, one way some have suggested would be to have them do more moving around in class. That could be as simple as having them using their hands to make triangles when learning geometry (Dixon). They also naturally crave competition, which is why the decline of recess and renaming games actually have an effect on these boys. More male teachers would have a marked effect, first they understand the way boys learn and secondly it would give boys without a strong male role model to look up to a healthy male influence, a thing many of them lack. An extreme measure that's been suggested has been gender segregated schools, which might not be a bad idea, if a curricula could be devised that work for boys. Maybe something like vocational high schools where they spend half their day on academic pursuits and then half working on engines or computers or tinkering with robotics and stuff boys tend to like. The graduation rates for boys from these schools is typically vastly higher with more student engagement than traditional schools.

Single-gender classrooms would allow boys and girls to be instructed in a way that is conducive to them. Literature choices could be offered to girls that are different from the ones offered to the boys. Science experiments for the boys could be more hands-on and messy as opposed to the girls’ science

Although separating male and female student might help concentration, students should not be separated based on gender because, separation would cost a lot of money, a new building, new staff, new bus drivers, new everything. Utilities would be the main cost increase. Bullying is much more common in boy-only or girl-only schools. Social interaction is also very important in schools, although it can be distracting in class, social interactions between male and female students are very important.

Lastly, the dreadful lack of company and/or friends. Some people have friends or companions of the opposite gender, to separate them would be like “ torture “ to them. Some others dislike to become friends with the same gender and would enjoy more to become friends with the opposite gender. Many people don’t even have friends and it now being lowered down to a even smaller variety , it would be even more difficult.This is yet another reason why I think Chesterfield County Schools shouldn’t separate genders.

But once students took the test the schools have found a more ¨positive effect¨ on the student's achievement."in direct support of higher expectations, strengthened standards and better tests.” (Source 5). Also Schools have acheieved the significant schools award for all the students doing good on the test and for the teachers and staff helping them out in school so they get a good future. ¨20 school systems that "have achieved significant, sustained, and widespread gains" on national and international assessments used Department of Education stated in Nov. 2004.” (Source 5). After taking the Standardized tests students have been getting better grades and have been understanding the topic in all the classes and teachers and staff say that they will get a better future now.”Standardized tests provide accurate comparisons between sub-groups. These sub-groups can include data on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, special needs, etc.” (Source

There was a girl name Maria who went to a Co-ed school for boys and girls. She was unhappy that she couldn’t concentrate in class because of all the drama and socializing between boys and girls. Then one day Maria look up the differences between Co-ed schools and Single-gender schools. Maria found that children who go to Single-Gender schools learn and get better grades than children who go to Co-ed schools. There are many differences between Single-Sex schools and Co-ed schools. Co-ed schools are the mixing of boys and girls. But, Single-Sex schools are the separation of boys and girls. Some advocates or educators thinks Single-Sex schools are better than Co-ed schools and others do not. The separation of girls and boys can lead to better grades, less distractions and more focus in class.

The typical school classroom conjures up images of boys and girls coexisting, raising their hands in equal numbers. However, that’s not always the case. According to 2010 data from NCES and the U.S. Census Bureau, from prekindergarten to senior year of high school, male students outnumber female students significantly in public school classrooms: 54 percent to 46 percent in pre-K and 51 percent to 49 percent from first grade to 12th grade.So with the disproportionate stats in the American classroom, is it beneficial to separate the genders from each other? Much debate has centered around this topic for years.

Nowadays, it seems like more and more people are pushing to put kids in public schools in segregated classes. Not by race this time, but by gender. This has been a common practice in private schools for a while, but is just now being pushed to public schools. There are many pros and cons to both sides, but even though single gender classes do have some merits, co education helps development, leaves students with the same grades, and is much easier to operate.

In today’s society, education has become a very important factor in a student 's life. Everyone tries to do and implement whatever is best for the student to learn and become successful. Therefore, as a result, society tries to separate schools based on gender. Schools should be separated by gender for many reasons. The first reason is that gender separation will help eliminate bullying. It has been demonstrated that boys, in general, tend to be more rude and violent than girls causing the boys to “bully” girls. Another reason they should be separated is to help break down stereotypes. An example of this is that girls are free of the pressure to compete with boys in male dominated subjects such as math and science. Another reason they should be separated is that it makes it easier on the teacher to use different learning techniques that are geared toward specific genders. It is a great idea to separate students by gender at schools if they want the students to have a better education. This will help prevent bullying at schools, help breakdown stereotypes, and encourage teachers to use different educational techniques.

A few years ago, separate classes for male and female students were common, but have decreased today. However, some parents are still worried about students’ attention during the class at coed schools. This thought maybe not correct. Because students at coed schools can learn ways to understand and to build friendships with members of other genders, coed school curriculum is more effective for their future lives. Staying in the same classroom, boys and girls have better educational and personal experiences.

Single sex schools have less distractions in class. I believe this because in a single sex environment boys do not feel the need to impress girls and girls would not have to downplay their strengths to impress boys. The first example to backup my point is a study by the Australian Council for Educational Research where they said “research indicates that single sex schools improve