preview

Archeological Field Method Paper

Decent Essays

Finding an arrowhead is a dream every child has held at one time or another. The ones who hold that dream the longest become archaeologists. Studying the lithic material from a site can seem tedious and dull, but the information that can be gleaned from it is invaluable. The type of lithic material can provide insight into the lifestyle, tool production, trading habits, and a possible time period of habitation. We aimed to discover some of this information from the items recovered during the two weeks of excavation at the East Carolina University Summer Ventures Archaeological Field Methods class.
Background
The Summer Ventures Archeological Field Methods team conducted field work at the site 31Pt501 known as Koon’s Landing in Grifton, North …show more content…

Guilford points “tend to be thick, lenticular or diamond-shaped in cross section, with a base that can be either con­cave, convex, or straight (Murphy & Murphy, 2010).” They are made with random strikes and rarely retouched. The Guilford point from Koon’s Landing has a concave base, making it a Guilford Concave point (Figure 6). These particular points are elliptical and do not have a clear distinction between the blade and the stem areas (Gumbus, 2008).
The possible Guilford point was made of metavolcanic rock. One biface that looks like a PPK tip is made from rhyolite and the other from quartzite. These are common materials in North Carolina and for Guilford points (Murphy & Murphy, 2010). The material from the shatter and flake evidence supports the notion that they were made at the site. The Guilford point was surrounded by similar metavolcanic flakes and shatter.
All PPKs were found close to Contentnea Creek. The Guilford point was found approximately 80 centimeters below the surface in test unit N1022 E997 at level 7. The PPK tip was found in STP 9A and the other quartzite biface was sound in STP 19A. The Guilford point is the oldest out of the three bifaces because it was approximately 80 centimeters below the surface. Most STPs were not deeper than 50 centimeters below the surface. The Guilford point also had a chipped tip. Its breakage was most likely caused by piercing an animal or tree and breaking. …show more content…

This artifact is believed to be a hammer stone and part of the stone had a rougher patch that seems indented from its use as a hammer stone. The smooth texture on one side indicates the stone may have been found near the creek by the original owners (Figure 7).
Hammer stones come in all shapes and sizes across a variety of cultures. They are usually stones found, not made, by indigenous people. They are comprised of local materials and could fit into hands securely. They are most likely the oldest tools used by apes and humans. Certain species of apes are known to use hammer stones to crack open hard shelled food and as weapons against other groups or individuals. The stone was found a few centimeters to the right of a core (Figure 7). A core is the original object flakes and shatter come from (Andrefsky, 2005). Cores are modified to become a tool or create flakes that will later become tools themselves. The core found at Koon’s Landing was made of quartzite, a material usually chosen to make projectile points or other tools because it is extremely durable. Though the stone and the core were found close to each other, no quartzite flakes or shatter were found nearby. The hammers stone and core seem to be discarded, supporting the hypothesis of a dumping site close to Contentnea

Get Access