Ap Euro Dbq Absolutism Pros And Cons

In the history of Europe, 17th and the beginning of 18th century is called the age of absolutism. Absolutism was the age which monarchs were in the peak of their power. Monarchy, coming from the Latin mono, meaning one, and absolute, meaning only, meant absolute and full power. Kings believed they had the “divine right” and their position was given by God. There were many different ideas and responses to Absolutism. We must keep in mind that the age of Enlightenment came right after, which really shows us how people really felt towards the matter. Looking from today’s view, one cannot agree with the idea of being ruled with an absolute monarchy, for they have always caused a rebellion and is a violation of personal rights. To understand why this matter had different responses, we should look at the different thinkers of the time.

Absolute monarchy or absolutism means that the sovereign power or ultimate authority in the state rested in the hands of a king who claimed to rule by divine right. Kangxi and Louis XIV were both shining examples for absolutist rule. Age of Absolutism was between 1610 and 1789. Absolutism is a term used to depict a type of monarchical power that was not at all restrained by institutions, for example, legislatures, social elites, or churches.

The king certainly has absolute power; he demonstrates it through punishment and rewards for disobeying or obeying his authority. He is the distributor of wealth, etc. So he can just as easily take it away. Although, you are allowed to think for yourself as well but it must be thought out extensively before said or done. If not and it has damaged you or the kingdom, it comes attached with serious consequences.

An absolute monarch is a ruler with total control over the government and the people. Peter the Great ruled as an absolute monarch who impacted Russia in both negative and positive ways. Although Peter expanded the borders of Russia by vast amounts, he spent a lot of money on his aspirations and goals. Peter’s desire for power led to the death of thousands of Russians. Peter made Russia great in the eyes of the world, but that was only at the cost of human life. Many of Peter’s ideas died with him on February 8,

If that leader can’t assure the security than others are needed and it no longer acts as an absolute government. Louis succeeded in running France successfully for quite a time just as the Romanov family ruled Russia making it an incredible military power. The Romanovs showcased the success of an absolutist monarchy by being in control until 1917. In a constitutional monarchy one could say a great advantage came in that normal people had a voice. In comparison, there is the absolutist monarch who doesn’t take anyone’s vote while the constitutional monarch will hear from the nobleman what one may hear from the peasants. Charles I felt the true strength of parliament when he needed financial backing, and the backing would only be given when he agreed that parliament would have a vote in ordinary taxing and unfair imprisonment. The parliament itself was made up of nobleman as well as landowners and merchants who all wanted a say in that the parliament couldn’t be broken up when Charles didn’t like what they were doing. The constitutional monarchy may have a king, but it’s not the kind that controls the country

Absolute monarchy or absolutism meant that the sovereign power or ultimate authority in the state rested in the hands of a king who claimed to rule

Absolute rulers believed in divine right, where monarchs are given the power to rule by God and are responsible only to God. They held this belief because it set them apart from the citizens they governed and instilled a feeling of fear and respect among their subjects. It also helped ensure that no one would question their leadership. However, this put them at odds with the common people because many citizens did not believe in divine right. They wanted to have a say in how the government was run and the decisions they made.

This reoccurring concept is a prime factor as to why Absolute monarchs had control over their nation and were able to keep other officials from interfering in their administration. The first absolute monarch to completely centralize authority was the Spanish ruler, King Philip II. Philip II was the first to make each appointed official in his nation responsible to him, meaning every decision was run by him before approval and use. Thus, being the start of King Philip’s bureaucracy, a meticulous series of documents and procedures to verify or enact a law (Valente). In addition, various attempts to restrict power of nobility are seen throughout Russian absolutism, starting with Ivan the Terrible.

Absolutism is a system in which the ruler has total power. In seventeenth century Europe, rulers that led with this system believed that their power was given to them by God and they were responsible only to God. Absolute Monarchs had much power. They could make laws, levy taxes, determine justice, control officials, and determine foreign policies. Louis XIV is considered the best example of an absolute monarch because French culture, language, and manners spread across Europe. French diplomacy and wars took over the political affairs of western and central Europe. Louis XIV’s rule was copied throughout Europe.

Absolute monarchy is the notion that the monarch rules will unlimited power, only omitted by divine law or natural law. During the seventeenth century, absolutism was ineffective in England, while it flourished in France. Comparatively, causes of its decline in England were similar to those of its former rise in France. These being; raging war(s), nobility power, religious tensions, and need for money. Whereas, the two countries were also different in respect of how each country’s monarch went about their divine right.

Absolute monarchy meant that the ultimate authority to run a state was in the hands of a king who ruled. An absolute monarch holds unrestricted political power over the country and its people. Peter the Great of Russia, the greatest and most controversial of the Russian Czars, was responsible for the country’s emergence as a great power. Peter the Great pacified nobility, created a standing army, and increased the county’s revenue. Peter the Great kept his nobles under control by giving them jobs in the military and civil offices. The Russian army was then both enlarged and professionalized by Peter the Great. Peter the great also increased the country’s revenue by increasing taxes and by promoting trade. Many of his reform’s help him centralize more political power. Centralization becomes important to an absolute monarch and Peter the Great knew just how to do it.

Monarchy is a form of autocratic in which the power and authority of the government are in the hands of a single person. In a monarchy, typically a king, queen, emperor, empress, tsar, or tsarina are in control. This position is most often inherited by royalty. Before the eighteenth century, each monarchy was absolute, meaning that the person in the position held all the powers of the government. After the eighteenth century, most monarchies turned into constitutional monarchies, in which the monarch shares their power with various other lawmakers.

The people are not allowed to meddle with creating and fixing laws. The life of a monarchy government is an expensive life. Thus requires the king to tax his people. When the monarch is oppressive this is when the people have no voice. Any demonstration or outcry by the people will get shut down quickly. They can stay in power for decades only death can stop a monarch. If the monarch is a tyrant like leader the people must endure these hardships for as long as that monarch is alive. Monarchs successors can sometimes be not the brightest individuals. They might not possess the actual knowledge to functionally run a country. Not one person can run a country. The old style of monarchies and governments did not produce order. Most of what they produced were wars and taxes on the people. Depending on the monarch they may be lenient or they might be controlling in the rights and laws for the people. This infringes on the natural rights and laws people are granted with. A monarch could take away the laws and rights that we are born with a simple word uttered by him. Rights and laws given by nature to all humans could be taken away in a split second by this monarch.

During the 1600s, a noble idea, Absolutism, was brought to Europe. As it is called, absolute monarch owns top power of the nation and they were believed to exercise their divine right. Louis XIV and Peter the Great, were both absolute rulers at that period. Comparing their performance, Peter’s more absolute idea make his empire greater than Louis’, in noble constraint, economic and educational development, and governmental reformation.

There are many types of Monarchy. There are absolute monarchies. Absolute monarchies are those to where the monarch rules all that happens, the trade, the war, the peace, the religion, everything. Then there are constitutional monarchies. They are the ones where the monarch is the head of state,