At this point in the classic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Roman emperor Julius Caesar has just been stabbed and murdered by a group of conspirators. Main characters Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both give eulogies for Caesar in the funeral scene (Act 3.2-3). While both of their speeches do share some similarities, there are very few and they are, for the very most part, different.
For example, Brutus' eulogy is given in the form of prose, while Mark Antony's eulogy is delivered in the form of blank verse. One similarity that both of the men's eulogies have is that they both express and show their admiration for Caesar. Another difference is the usage of rhetoric appeal. Brutus uses the
…show more content…
Brutus was being very honest about everything. Saying how he just wants the best for all of his fellow Romans and doesn't want to hurt anyone or for anyone to get hurt. He was ultimately just an innocent bystander in Caesar's murder who was pressured and gave into the madness. So Brutus wasn't really a bad guy. However, Mark Antony is pretty much the exact opposite of Brutus. Basically, he's being really manipulative and is trying to invoke a cornucopia of pandemonium because of his own selfish desires. Mark uses paralipsis by bringing out Caesar's will with an attitude like,, "Oh, I don't want to draw any attention to this." Even though he is practically flaunting it in the plebeians faces. He wants all the people to hunt down and kill the conspirators so that they won't get in the way of what he wants, ultimate power. He's being a bit of a jerk. I would say that these differences are just because of their personalities and their own perceptions of the crowd. Naturally, Brutus sees the crowd as a group of Romans who have the burning desire to be free. On the other hand, Mark Antony sees the crowds as people who possess the ability to come up with an ambitious man who deserves the crown, and maybe cause mass destruction and chaos along the way. But once again, these are two very different
He tells them that he did it because Caesar was ambitious and for the good of Rome. The crowd is into what he says. They call him “noble Brutus” (III, ii, 11) and even say on the next page “let Brutus be Caesar” (III, ii, 47) just like they had said about Marc Antony. In the end there was something different with Marc Antony's speech that put him over the top, and it was that he lead the crowd towards rioting. As stated earlier in the paper the crowd wanted to kill Brutus and burn his house and all this bad stuff to do to him and the conspirators but, none of that was said about Marc Antony during Brutus’s
Marc Antony had the more convincing speech at Caesar's funeral. Antony used pathos and logos to make his speech more convincing. He also got the plebeians fired about and angry about the death of Caesar. Brutus however had a different approach to his speech.
Antony was looked down upon by all the conspirators except for Brutus. They wanted to kill Antony as well as Caesar because they feared that he would become as powerful as him and possibly a dictator. Brutus persuaded the others not to add to the assassination by saying, "And for Mark Antony, think not of him: for he can do no more than Caesar's arm when Caesar's head is off"(2.1.181-183). Brutus underestimated Antony and perceived him as a person who didn't always take life seriously, couldn't have a serious nature and therefore, not a thinker. Brutus continued to argue with Cassius who did not believe him. "Alas, good Cassius, do not think of him. If he love Caesar, all that he can do is to himself -- take thought and die for Caesar. And that were much he should, for he is given to sports, to wildness, and much company (2.1.185-189). Brutus judged him as being frivolous, and simply liking sport and partying, with a reputation for womanizing. Unfortunately for Brutus and the conspirators he was respected by Caesar and so simply couldn't be ignored.
Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to articulate the points of many characters. More explicitly the use of different rhetorical strategies can be seen after the death of Caesar. Preceding Caesar's death speeches were given by Mark Antony and Brutus. In these speeches Brutus tried to justify Ceaser death with vague answers, while Mark Antony came to the support of Caesar and questioned why he really had to die. Brutus and Mark Antony's use of logos, pathos and ethos, allowed them both to give effective speeches. Although Brutus gave a strong speech, Mark Antony exceptional use of pathos and ethos provided him a slight edge over Brutus.
The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.
In the tragic play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the ruler of Rome, Julius Caesar, is stabbed to death by some of his so-called friends. Brutus, one of Caesar's best friends, is approached by some of the other senators to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar. Brutus weighs his options and decides to join the conspirators for the good of Rome. At Caesars's funeral, Brutus gives a speech to convince the citizens that the conspirators were right to kill Caesar. In contrast, Antony gives a speech to convince the Romans that there was no real reason to kill Caesar. Both characters try to persuade the audience, but they achieve different tones using literary and rhetorical devices. The tone of Brutus' speech is prideful, while the tone of Antony's speech is dramatic and inflammatory.
The differences of Brutus’ speech and Antony’s speech are pretty blatant. Brutus’s speech appears to be rehearsed and he makes sure to speak well about himself, in order to win the crowd over. He knew that Caesar was going to be killed. In Antony’s speech seems like they are words spoken from the heart and spontaneous. Antony does not focus on himself, to
The death of Julius Caesar was a very tragic event in history. The speeches given by both Mark Antony and Brutus were very influential to the conclusion. This essay will discuss and explain both speeches and how they relate to the resolution. The speech given by Mark Antony was very heartfelt and inspiring.
In the Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Anthony both presented a speech to the citizens of Rome. Brutus argued why his actions to kill Julius were acceptable while Antony contradicted Brutus’s views, arguing why Caesar should not have been murdered. Both speakers used ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade the people of Rome. Brutus’s speech was mainly based on logic, while Antony’s speech took more of an emotional approach . Overall, Antony had a sophistic style, he was much more artful and cunning than Brutus. He reeled in the crowd like a fish and captured them with his compelling diction.
Despite these drastic differences, the two orations are similar in a way essential to their effectiveness. Brutus and Antony demand audience participation by asking questions and making comments they know will spark fire in the hearts of the Roman people. After providing his explanation for the extermination of a dangerously ambitious tyrant, Brutus questions the people as to whether or not he has offended anyone or if anyone disagrees with his ideals. He is such an authority figure, though, and he knows no one will stand up to him because the people find safety within the mass. He dares anyone to defy him, "...I pause for a / reply" (Act III, scene ii, lines 34-5). The people reply, "None, Brutus, none!" (Act III, scene ii, line 36). Once he knows he has won the people, Brutus states that he has the same death for himself (the same death as Caesar) when it will benefit Rome. To this, the people reply with shouts of
By contrast Antony from Julius caesar heavily relies upon the power of language and its ability to exploit the human flaw that is emotion, and by doing so manipulate ones perception through a emotionally (pathos) driven argument. Antony has a greater understanding of the people and knows that they are passionate people who will be swayed by such talk. Also Antony unlike Brutus uses iambic pentameter this shows that he has a higher authority which would make the audience listen more carefully. After each argument Antony produces in Caesar’s defense, he uses irony through the lines “But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man”. This line is repeated a number of times creating an anaphora. As well as slowly dismantling Brutus’
"Friends, Romans, and Countrymen lend me your ears"(49). In the play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is given an opportunity to speak at Caesar's funeral. In his speech, Antony addresses the death of Caesar and draws attention to the foul play at hand. Not only that, but he also discusses the legacy that Caesar left behind. In doing so, Marc Antony uses verbal irony to being to light the conspirator's betrayal toward not only Caesar, but to the people of Rome.
In Julius Caesar both Brutus and Mark Antony give amazing speeches to win over the public in their favor. Both of the speeches take place after the death of Julius Caesar. Also both speeches utilize many different rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, and logos. It is debatable on which speech is better because of so many different reasons. Some of those reasons being that Brutus's speech was concise and got his point across quickly, whereas Mark Antony's speech was overall more effective but it was far longer and he also had much more time to prepare his speech.
The first speech we hear is that of Brutus. In his speech he aims to
The play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare in 1599, is about the murder of Julius Caesar, a great Roman general who conjured many lands, and helped to form the Great Empire that we read about today. Caesar was to be crowned king of Rome, but he was savagely murdered by a group of conspirators before he received the crown. After Caesar's brutal murder, Brutus a very honourable Roman, who helped in in Caesar's death, and Mark Antony, one of Caesar's closest friends, gave speeches at Caesar's funeral, trying to convince the crowd to agree with them and turn against the other. Brutus and Antony both made convincing speeches, but Antony came out on top, because Antony let the people make up their own mind, by appealing to their emotions.