Antonio V. Rodriguez Case Analysis

The most crucial part of this case, comes down to one word: reaction. Furthermore, Los Angeles Police Officers, Christopher Conley and Jennifer Pederson, did what their instincts told them to do- which was react. Angel Mendez and Jennifer Lynn Garcia were hiding out in a shack, and Mendez was holding a gun. Both officers felt threatened, and they did what trained police officers are told to do, along with what anyone that knows how to react, would have done. If one feels threatened, one is going to whatever it takes to protect one’s self. The United States Supreme Court should rule in favor of the Los Angeles Police Department because officer’s Christopher Conley and Jennifer Pederson had every right to react the way the did,

THE COURT SHOULD FIND THAT THE SEARCHING OFFICERS WERE UNREASONABLE IN THEIR BELIEF THAT HIS COTENANT HAD APPARENT AUTHORITY TO CONSENT TO THE SEARCH BECAUSE HER ANSWERS TO THEIR QUESTIONS CREATED AMBIGUITY AND THEY DID NOT RESOLVE THAT AMBIGUITY.

A lot of people argue over which rights are protected by the Second Amendment that applies the average citizen. Due to this argument many court cases have been filed including The District of Colombia v. Heller. Heller wanted to register a handgun for him to use as a self-defense weapon for him to keep in his home, The District of Columbia denied his requested to get the handgun registered. They stated that the law prohibits the ownership of a firearm if not being used as through a lawfully organization, even as lawfully owned firearms were to be unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a trigger lock. Strongly disagreeing with this Heller filed a court case against The District of Columbia, and they fought back hard. You see the second amendment

Buckley v. Valeo: Buckley v. Valeo was a court case where the judges held limits on how much could be spend on elections. This was unconstitutional to what the count case came out to be

Our client, Dave Donaldson, allegedly extorted Vincent Valdor for $5,000 via email. Donaldson lives in Kentucky, and Valdor lives in Ohio. The federal statute which Donaldson allegedly violated states one may not, “gain property or money by the use or threat of violence, harm to reputation, or damage to property."

I believe it is explicitly clear that this business owner should continue to grow and sell marijuana from his store. According to the state law in California he is operating completely within the confines of the law. However, now the debate begins, does the federal law concerning marijuana supersede California’s state law; I believe it does not. According to article 1 section 8 of the U.S. Constitution the Congress of the United States has the power, “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes”. Therefor since the marijuana is not being sold across state lines, the federal government should have zero jurisdiction in the matter. But because of the Supreme Courts decision in Wickard v.

After reading the case over and over again I have come to the conclusion that this was an interesting case to make a decision on due to the lack of substantial evidence. In reference to the case it brings me to the very first question of the assignment. What acts did Garcia do that amounted to a conspiracy? The concern in which brought up the idea of conspiracy in this case is the fact that Garcia association with his fellow gang members. This is a general agreement among gang members to support one another in fights against rival gangs can constitute sufficient evidence to support a conviction of conspiracy to commit assault when the conduct of the alleged conspirators is otherwise insufficient.

The court’s decision regarding Gonzales v. Raich dealt closely with the Controlled Substances Act and how the DEA could handle certain events dealing with marijuana. In 1996, California voters passed the Compassionate Use Act which in turn legalized marijuana for medicinal use. However, California's law clashed with the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which banned possession of marijuana. After the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) seized doctor-prescribed marijuana from a patient's home, an assembly of medical marijuana consumers sued the DEA and U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft in federal district court.

The dissenting opinions for the case of Rodriguez vs United States were given by judges Anthony Kennedy, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Justice Samuel Alito. In Justice Kennedy’s dissenting opinion he wrote that he agreed with all off Justice Thomas' opinion, except his conclusion that the officer had reasonable suspicion. Justice Thomas argued that the conduction of a quick drug sniff test was reasonable and that a dog sniff does not change the classification of the traffic stop thus it was lawful and done in a reasonable manner. He also argued that the dog sniff was justified by the officer's reasonable suspicion that Rodriguez and his passenger were involved in criminal activity. In very surprising passage, Justice Kennedy claimed that the

In this detailed and shocking book, Jonathan Kozol describes the horrific and unjust conditions in which many children in today’s society are forced to get their education. Kozol discusses three major reasons for the discrepancies in America’s schools today: disparities of property taxes, racism, and the conflict between state and local control. The first of these reasons is that of the differences of available property tax revenues. Kozol discusses the inconsistencies in property tax revenues and the problem that the poorer districts aren’t getting the same opportunities for education as the more affluent neighborhoods. He says the reason for this is that the

According to the save Texas school, “According to the Texas Comptroller’s office, the State Data Center estimates that the number of public elementary and secondary school students will grow by about 900,000 between 2010 and 2040.” But due to the lake of educational institution and fund it is hard to provide education for all. If I become the Texas representative then I will try to provide fund for needed people and also try to make various law that lead to the expanding of the educational institution. Texas has additionally observed a huge increment in the quantity of monetarily distraught understudies in its state funded schools.

This could cut the local tax rate – in most school districts now around $1.50 per $100 of property value for maintenance and operations (M&O) – to roughly 50 cents! The maximum M&O tax rate – also now generally capped at $1.50 – must be reduced by the same percentage as total M&O taxes. If the income tax cut the property tax rate by 65%, then it would also cut the tax cap by 65%. After the cap was cut, only the voters in a school district could increase their district’s maximum tax rate. The Bullock Amendment then provides that the remaining one-third of income tax revenue could be spent, but only on education. State income tax payments are deductible from taxable income in calculating federal income taxes. Deductibility shifts part of the cost of public education to the federal government. The above chart shows that, although the tax would have raised $16.4 billion in 2004, the net cost to Texas taxpayers would have been only $3.9 billion. Lower property taxes would have returned most of the new revenue ($10.9 billion) to taxpayers. Uncle Sam would have picked up 10% of the total cost of the income tax ($1.6 billion) through higher deductions on federal tax

All of this had nothing to do with the socioeconomic status of the residents of the school district. This had everything to do with taking extreme and often ridiculous measures in an attempt to put on a façade of fiscal responsibility. Oftentimes the harebrained ideas backfired, and caused taxpayer dollars to be wasted.

In Texas when it comes to education spending there is a thing called per pupil funding. Per pupil funding is an average amount of money each pupil is funded. Little do we know,that Texas’s per pupil funding is decreasing. School findings are a major hindrance to the students in Texas schools. There is so much absence of support from the Texas School Board of Education when it comes to school funding.With that being said ,it is not astounding that Texas falls at or close to the base in various vital school measures. Texas positions among the most minimal in joined SAT scores ,47th out of the 50 states ,and is in the quarter broadly in perusing capability. As of

This paper presents a case analysis of Richard Ramirez, the serial killer of the 1980s better known as “The Night Stalker”. Using the qualitative method and content analysis, the findings reveal that the law enforcement procedures were minimal because of the technology available during that time and the prosecution was sufficient because of the criminal justice system.