For decades now animal testing has been a known method in society. The downside of the reality is society is not fully aware of what is going on behind closed doors, and the severity of what animal testing truly is. Although there have been many points where animal testing has proven to help in certain studies, it is also proven to be unnecessary. Biomedical industries are looking for the next cure or the safest makeup for example, but the process of it all is wrong. There are millions of animals yearly being put through suffering and cruel conditions with no break or recovery time. There is no way to actually see results in such a vigorous treatment. These animals are sick and abused daily for long periods of time and to think that any living …show more content…
Regardless of the type of testing that is being held on the animals it is not something we would perform on a human being. An animal may be close to a human but not as close as some would like to believe they are. The harsh chemicals and pain inflicted would hurt an animal in the same way a human feels pain. The ugly truth is what the world has turned their back to. There are alternatives to these tests and it is time they are used. Animal testing is inhumane and pointless because we cannot correlate the effects of products on animals with those of humans due to our physiological …show more content…
With animal testing failing new alternatives have come about. A new method called Vitro has ben invented as an alternative to using animals. This new method uses human cells and tissues, which is as close as you can get to an actual person. Currently the PETA foundation funds these new methods. Harvard’s Wyss Institute has also created “organs-on-chips.” These chips contain human cells, which are grown in “state-of-the-art system to mimic the structure and function of human organs and organ systems” (Peta). These are one of many new advances in technology that help find new ways of testing without harming millions of
I am requesting permission to hire Ms. Phyllis Whitney-Ousley to an emergency hire contract for the Fall 2017 term. HLTH, HPER, and PHED faculty member, Ms. Cheryl Green, has gone on FMLA as of Monday, 08-21-17. Ms. Green’s leave is scheduled to last for essentially the balance of the Fall semester. This leaves a void of six classes which require staffing. The dearth of adjuncts available to teach in the day, when the lion’s share of the vacated classes is offered, does not permit me to staff the aforementioned sections with adjuncts. Additionally with the start of the semester being nigh, I will not have time to post a position and conduct a search.
Animal testing is something that is extremely prevalent in our world. It is crucial for any medical issues and many other day-to-day things we do and use. People, though, do not like the fact that we kill innocent animals everyday. In our society, there is a lot of animal abuse. It is sanctioned and legal to test on animals, even if that means that we harm and abuse animals. There is no limit to how much the animals are harmed because they are not protected by laws since testing is completely legal. This is an issue that is not really talked about, but needs to be discussed. Animal testing results are not an accurate predictor of the effects of many products on humans. If this is true, why do we test on them? The supporters of animal testing rely on scientific evidence and experiments to prove that the results of animal testing will benefit humanity, but the people who protest against animal testing want to protect the rights of all animals and try to find flaws with the scientific experiments being done on animals.
A lot of people don’t take it into consideration, but it’s an issue that we really need to address. Animal testing is cruelty more than science. Animals are not treated well and are often abused by their handlers. They are not just objects. They have feelings and can think, just like us humans do. Namely,
As the number of animals being used in animal testing goes up, many people pose a concern about the subject. There are around 100 million animals that are killed in the United States each year alone in animal testing (“Experiments”). These animals are tested for medical training, chemical, drug, food, cosmetics, biology lessons, and even curiosity driven experiments Animals including cats, dogs, rats, guinea pigs, monkeys, and many others are used. Alternative testing options are ways that scientists can still study and research different things while also saving the lives of animals that are used in animal testing everyday. Even though many people depend on animal testing to discover different cures
Animal testing is wrong for various reasons. The history of animal testing goes back to the writings of the ancient Greeks and is defined as any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. Examples of animal testing include: forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dog’s pesticides, and dripping chemicals into rabbits’ eyes. Although, many people believe that animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, innocent animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, for a company’s benefit, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment. Animal testing has negative effects on not only animals, but on society and the economy. Some reasons why include, but are not limited to: alternative methods exist that are safer, ethical, and cheaper; billions of dollars are wasted each year on animal testing because neither the corporations nor the customers are benefiting from it; and just because the product is tested for animals, it does not necessarily make it safe for humans. Therefore, because animal testing is unreliable, leads to billions of wasted dollars, and causes an incredible amount of animal suffering, we must begin to use alternative methods and raise awareness about this huge issue.
According to the Humane Society International, animal testing can be defined as “procedures performed on living animals assessing the effectiveness of…[a] product” and “All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering (“Fact Sheet”, n.d.).
Currently, there are millions of rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, and many other animals that are trapped inside cages in labs around the country. They suffer badly as their bodies ache and they are lonely and long to be free. These animals hope that one day they will be set free as they must wait in fear for the next experimentation to begin. The conditions the animals are put through are harsh and usually cause the organism to have strange behaviours such as pulling out their hair or biting at their own skin. They are so scared that every time someone walks by, they jump, scared to death that it's their turn to be tortured. Even after going through these many situations, most of these animals end up dead. Animal testing is extremely immoral and unethical as it causes the suffering of animals when in fact, the results are almost always inaccurate killing millions of animals. Most of the animals that are put in the test almost never show accurate results. As well, there are many other alternatives that can be used instead of the murder of all these living organisms that have done nothing to deserve it. These efforts are usually less expensive and don’t occur at the cost of a living organism. Therefore, due to animal rights and ethical issues, alternative methods, and the unreliability of test results in humans, animal testing must be prohibited for use in today’s research, treatments and products.
Medical advancement, disease prevention, cosmetic testing—whatever the reason, animal testing is a relevant debate that individuals are confronted with more and more every day. There are some who believe animal testing is necessary and justified in all respects and others who believe that animal testing is not something to take so lightly—it is something that should be considered carefully and in accordance with the situations and practices at play. Both sides of this argument consider moral, medical, and ethical implications carried by their opinions on the matter. It is a crime in the United States to test on an individual without their given and written consent. The question then reveals itself: is animal testing ethical, and if so, to what
Imagine being strapped down to a cold table, helpless, while painful, brain damaging procedures are being performed and there's nothing that can be done. Animal testing has taken place throughout history and has been argued on whether or not it is necessary. Many people start to disagree with using animals for biomedical research. On moral and ethical grounds, animal testing is far from necessary and leads to suffering and deaths of millions of innocent animals while causing physical and mental pain, permanent damage, and reflects badly on our progressive society.
For thousand of years companies test their products on animals and experiment on them causing horrible effects. These animals are innocent and do not deserve to be treated like this. Those experiments cause the animals to develop deformities and diseases. However if you help out and do your part you can help prevent animal testing. There are many alternatives to animal testing that most people do not know about. Animal testing is a big issue and should be stopped.
Imagine if aliens came to earth and abducted you, and they started experimenting on you by sticking toxins in your eyes, and sticking needles in you. This is what
Animal testing is a real result of pure fatality. Almost 87% of animals tested are selected randomly, many problems are that we are funding and basically supporting animal testing. More than half of the animals tested are killed during experiments (Human Society International). The animals tested alive are conscious while the test is being distributed to their bodies. Most research is often very poor, testing selfless animals for no reason at all! The testing would make more sense if the animals were at least being treated well and taken care of right during, before, and after the
Is it really necessary for animals to be used for medical research? This question still remains, yet to be answered. It is a matter of opinion one would think. However if you look closer there is a lot more to it than opinion. People that feel sorry for animals usually are the ones that don’t agree with animal testing. That is where it starts. Scientists use animal testing as a way to find cures. Animal testing helps them figure out what will work and not work on humans. It helps find cures faster and prevent deaths. Although some people believe that is true, I have a different opinion on it all. This testing hasn’t help as many people as you may think.Just because animals are living breathing creatures like humans, doesn't mean their systems are anything like ours. There has been so many tests done on animals to help find cures and medicine that will work on humans. What do we
When the customer knows the brand value and familiar with the unique associations of the brand then that customer holds the position of resonance with the brand in terms of brand loyalty (keller, 2016).
Much too often in America today, modern music and art programs in schools are perceived to many as extracurricular activities rather than important subjects that are vital to a student’s learning and skill development. The truth of the matter is that encouraging music and art education in public schools has a much larger impact on student’s grades, academic performance, and the economy than the majority people realize. Within the next year city school budgets will be dropping by twenty five percent, and despite the fact that music and art programs have been showing a dramatic contribution to student’s learning, this substantial drop in funding for the programs will lead to no dedicated money for art or music programs (Mezzacappa). There is