Animal Testing Human Body

In conclusion, scientists and researchers shouldn’t test on animals because it hurts them hurts them. When scientists make animals have pain and the react to it they continue to cause them more pain. Most scientists and researchers buy and breed animals to do tests on them and they shouldn’t because it isn’t right and they have no right to do so. When most animals are tested on they die or get really sick to the point where they might need to be put down. Animals testing should be banned and scientists should stop breeding test

An issue that is hotly debated is about animal testing. It is clear that overall animal testing should not be allowed. It shouldn’t be allowed because animal testing does not even do much to the humans, because it can hurt or kill the animals, and finally because these animals that are being tested aren’t being protected the right way. Even though that other people could say that animals are a great replicate of humans and can develop cures. Also they could say that it helps less people get sick, it kills the animals by the scientists not protecting them. Overall animals shouldn’t be tested on.

Several opponents of animal testing are blinded by their own opinions and have not taken into consideration the growing list of scientific advancements from animal testing. Between 1992 and 1994, the Research Defense Society published a list that gave the number of patients who benefited from animal research in the UK; from antibiotics to heart and lung transplants, 83,392,400 people were able to benefit from animal research ("Animal Rights . . ."). Several vaccines, antibiotics, drugs, prevention ideas and treatments have resulted from animal testing, and if experimentation is stopped, a cure for diabetes, aides, and cancer would be beyond reach, new surgical procedures to repair heart defects will be terminated, 30,000 young Americans with cystic fibrosis will never have a normal life span, the development of artificial blood will never continue and several other new life improving studies will never occur ("Animal Research . . .").

According to Hajar animal testing has been used for a long period of time as early as “ Early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC), performed experiments on living animals.” This not only shows how long animal testing has been around it also shows us how crucial it has been for everyone even thousands of years ago. Animals used for testing are important in developing cures for people. Animal testing has been and will continue to be a crucial part of the human society to keep humans healthy as well as other animals. I believe that animal testing is a part of human society and most definitely should continue to be used. There have been disabilities that controlled many people for centuries however with animal testing fighting off these horrific incidents has brought people hope to become healthy once again as well as a future. Continued animal testing is ethically the lesser of two evils, allowing disease to be understood and for the emergence of viable solutions to help human survivability. Animal testing has given people the ability to fight off deadly diseases, tumors, as well as have the ability to overcome blindness.

Animal testing should not continue when alternative methods could be implemented to reduce unnecessary harm to animals. This is because animals are

Over the centuries, the evolution from ape to man and its surroundings has changed. Cavemen did everything in their power to survive. “Survival of the fittest” was said by Charles Darwin. Humans today are interested in how to fix world problems. Such as, diseases that don’t currently have vaccines or cures. To search for answers, experts were led to animals. Their fascination towards animals has heightened over the course of millennium years. That curiosity eventually led to animal testing. Many people have different opinions when it comes to using animals for scientific research. The real question is, should animals be tested at all? Jane Goodall, an animal activist who has dedicated her whole life

In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used in medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.

“Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research.” (Hajar) As early as 384-258 BC by early greek physician scientists Aristotle and Erasistratus who would perform experiments on living animals. Galen (129-199/217 AD), a Greek physician of Rome was one of the greatest in the history of medicine. With some experiments made on animals he was able to advance our understanding of the anatomical structure, physiology, pathology and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr, an Arab physician in the twelfth century Moorish Spain brought upon the idea of animal testing as a way to practice surgical procedures on animals before using any kinds of methods on humans. As history shows, man has endured and overcome many diseases and illnesses. These diseases killed many people and caused many to suffer. Most have been cured due to man’s medical research. Tests done on animals have improved the lives of many humans who would have suffered themselves. Scientists, Doctors and other

Animal testing is a very relevant and debatable moral issue. It is when scientists take animals and run different kinds of test on them to see what reaction occur from the animal. Scientists test drugs, vaccines, and cosmetics on animals before the drug or cosmetic is distributed out for the public to use. Usually, these tests do not just involve one animal during tests, they involve many. This is due to the use of multiple animals for more detailed test results. In 2013, over 100 million animals were used in some sort of testing, whether testing for medical research, or used in a high school science laboratory. (Peta) The article How much does the public support animal research? Depends on the question, shows data that many people do not understand animal testing or are unaware of it. The author of the article, Jeffery Mervis, ran a survey, to see what people thought about animal testing. He did this survey several times. Each time he conducted the survey he would ask the surveyed a question similar to “Do you support or agree with

Some people argue against testing because it kills animals. Scientists hold them captive, experiment on them and then they kill them. However, scientists have had a lot of success in finding drugs that work on humans. The medications they have found have saved millions of lives, and we now have many vaccines to prevent people from getting sick and possibly dying. Animal testing should be allowed to continue because it is very beneficial to humans and has saved many lives.

Specific evidence points that animal testing should not be allowed; however the debate is also on moral grounds. Several people, about 60% of the population, agree that animal testing should be banned because it is just wrong. To be born into the world on a concrete floor and be made to lead a life with no freedom is worse than having no life. They have no chance to stop the pain or torment, simply because they are “just animals.” Animal activists and everyday people believe that humans are voices for the animals. Therefore, animal testing is considered ethically wrong and people should act as the advocate for the animals.

Animal testing, because of its links to animal cruelty, causes many people to question whether it should be outlawed. Without animal testing in medical field, medical research would not have the vaccinations in use today that saves lives every minute. Galen, a European physician in 200 AD, used animal experimentation to understand and comprehend the complexity of the human body. Even in today’s time, the human body is a mystery and things happen that physicians cannot explain or understand.

All across the united states animal testing is being discussed over. People are discussing the treatment of all different varieties of animal species. The controversy has erupted about how animals are being treated, how we should handle it, and what should be done about it.

Most people that benefit from medical animal testing don’t even know they do. (Wolff) A large number of people don’t actually see how much progress we have made because of animal testing. Penicillin was first found in the Oxford labs after being tested on 20 different mice, the cure for Parkinson’s disease which involved experiments on monkeys, and multiple other life-saving vaccines were also developed there. Oxford scientists are now working on developing a cure for malaria. All of the vaccines they have created that also helped save millions of lives, were tested on animals. (Hansen) A main point animal testing protesters make is: the tests cause the animals pain and they are inhumane. Multiple scientists would like to point out that they do their best to make sure their tests cause the least amount of pain as possible. Most tests consist of digging, smelling, running, and swimming. When looking inside of the animal they try to focus on x-rays, and non-invasive tests similar to them in hopes of making it less uncomfortable for the

As you can see animal-based testing is more helpful than not, but only when used for the right reasons. Animal based-testing has helped find cures,and is a faster way to find answers, and not all scientists have abused their “lab specimen”. There has been evidence of insignificant animal based testing and human deaths due to animal based testing, although, that is just one side of the animal-based research information line. With animal-based testing, there can be answers found. Answers that will help us greatly in the future. It is true that there other ways to take these tests, but think of all the lives that have been saved, and maintained with animal-based testing. Do you think it would be a good idea to end