Alexander The Great: The Field Of Battle Of Babylon

I think Alexander deserves the title of Alexander the Great. He was 20 years old when he launched his invasion into the Persian Empire. The evidence I will use are these documents. The legend of the helmet, document D. The battle of Porus, document B. Alexander's empire compared to the Roman Empire, document A, E. I think Alexander was great, because of the size his empire and how little time it took him to make.

Alexander the Great primary reason for defeating Darius in battle is the fact that he knew that his small army could not defeat Darius enormous army. He had to spread Darius army wide therefore weakening him in numbers and was able to send his stronger elite soldiers to Darius weakest point which was in the middle. It is very apparent that Alexander had victory on his mind but his strategy seemed to be both effective and efficient. Although, Alexander the great and Darius were in battle, it seemed that Alexander used fewer soldiers but he was able to. Take working at the bank for instance, in most loan departments the bank would employ normally around thirty people.

This definition perfectly depicts the battle strategies that Alexander the ‘Great’ used in war. Peter Green’s research out of UCLA is useful in illustrating Alexander’s homicidal tendencies (Document C). Green’s work describes the terrible effect Alexander had on the citizens of Tyre, mercilessly taking the lives of 7,000 people through the burning of their buildings, selling 30,000 citizens into slavery, and crucifying 2,000 men. This terrible act even alarmed the Sidonians, who were allies to Alexander and enemies to the citizens of Tyre. Also, according to the records of the philosopher and historian Lucius Flavius Arrianus written in the year 130, Alexander used the strategy of confusing the elephants of a prince named Porus to win his last major battle, however, though Porus’s army was trampled and killed by the elephants, the same fate was bestowed upon Alexander’s men.

Alexander the Great was able to defeat King Darius III at the Battle of Gaugamela because of his advanced battle strategies. These included upgrading the phalanx position. Instead of the spears either being straight forward or directly up, he had the back rows' spears point at a 75º angle to deflect arrows and javelins while the front row has their spears straight forward. On both sides of his phalanx, Alexander had set up cavalry. Alexander also had a second phalanx to prevent defeat. Alex first decided to lead the Persians away from the middle ground where the king was. After King Darius III had noticed what was happening, he ordered part of his cavalry to attack from the side. To avoid being surrounded, Alexandre charged straight into the

Alexander the Great was the king of Macedonia, conqueror of the Persian Empire, and one of the greatest military geniuses of all times. Even at an early age, Alexander had the promise to become a great leader. Through all his victories and conquests, he has become a great hero and has had a large impact on history. That is why I chose he book Alexander the Great, by J.R. Hamilton for my review. Hamilton does a very good job with the story of Alexander the Great.

very smart commander. In 334 bc him and his army attacked the Persians, the Persians had a much

In the fourth century BC, rapid cultural, economic, social, and political changes were occurring in the Mediterranean and Asia Minor as a result of the conquests of Alexander the Great. In 337 BC, Alexander the Third inherited the Macedonian kingdom after his father, Philip the Second, died. Philip the Second has already taken control over all of Greece, and Alexander used the manpower and money from this to expand even further, into Persia. Beginning in 334 BC, Alexander started an intense campaign through Persia, concurring city after city. Eventually, Alexander had conquered all of Persia and forced the Persian king Darius the third to the city of Ecbatana, where he was killed. Instead of returning to Greece after his victory over the Persian

Jerry and LaDonna met on a Christian dating website in January 2011. LaDonna stated that they both were looking for a long-term commitment and after 9 months of courting they deceived to get married. Jerry and LaDonna have one adopted daughter named Kayleigh age 8, they have no biological children together.

The primary reason Alexander was victorious in his battle against Darius was his use of resources. Alexander used the minimum amount of resources to achieve his goal of victory on the battlefield. Alexander was able to keep close communications with his entire army to relay important information about the attack. Equifinality is the principle that a goal can be achieved from multiple approaches (Graham & Weingart, 2015). Alexander knew he could not win the battle with a direct head on approach so adapted a unique approach to overcome Darius’ massive numbers. Alexander knew that his vision was to beat Darius in battle. A clear vision is important to define future threats (Ozdem, 2011). With a clear vision, and communication, Alexander was able to defeat Darius in battle. Even though Alexander was outnumbered at least 4-to-1 by Darius’s army. Alexander chose to use his men sparingly and retained resources until later in the battle to ensure they were fresh and could take advantage to the tiring troops of Darius.

On the day of the battle it was cold and rainy. Even though King Darius's army was much larger than Alexanders they weren't as well trained. Alexander had more room than Darius because of his smaller army so he was more mobile and he could spread out his troops quicker and better. When the battle began, King Darius's army was on the offense but they were soon on the defense. Alexander was using a phalanx formation and using that he evenly spread out his army when King darius saw this he attempted to take alexanders right flank with his calvary but he

He saw multiple omens of victory including an eagle flying over Darius. Alexander set his cavalry on the right. In the middle was his Macedonian soldiers and archers on the sides of the Macedonians. A different tactic he did was put his troops in the sides at an angle so he couldn’t be flanked. As the battle began Alexanders forces moved right and Darius’ forces moved left but Alexanders move was a trick. Alexander then moved to challenge Darius on the right while some of Darius’ chariots moved to attack the Macedonians. This maneuver failed because the Macedonians just opened up and let then through. Soon after this Darius realized there was no hope. As he fled the rest of his army followed and the battle was won by

In history Alexander the Great is always one of the topics to learn, and one of the most asked question is what did Alexander do to be so great. Alexander might have been born great to achieve greatness or have greatness thrust upon him and this one of the reasons we still talk about him today. Alexander the Great took the crown at the age of 20. When he was only 13 Alexander tamed a horse that no one else could ride that was named Bucephalus which impressed his father. At the age of 16 he was a horseman and went to war, riding his horse that no one was able to ride on. Alexander the Great was born in Pella (capital of Macedonia) on July 20, 356 B.C and died from a fever in Babylon on June 323 B.C. After the assassination of Philip II in 336 B.C his son Alexander inherited one of the most powerful armies in the world and started an invasion attack in Persia. Alexander defeated his rival King Darius of Persia during the Battle of Issus in 333 B.C completing his father's dream and becoming a great leader. Through his schooling with his tutor Aristotle, Aristotle philosophy helped him achieve invading attacks his father couldn’t accomplish and giving him a chance to “admire and maintain these disparate cultures” (Jarus). Alot was accomplished by Alexander after he had died and for that he was known to be great. Even when he died because of a fever his people wanted to believe it was caused by alcohol poisoning or asassianly-poisoning. He had defeated

Many of us have studied or learned about roman history and their conquerors. One of many great conquerors in roman history, is Alexander the Great. Alexander was one of the youngest conquerors in history at the age of thirty and he conquered most of the known world. Though many question Alexander and wonder if he really was great, I say that Alexander was one of the most successful conquerors in roman history and he was really a great.

Alexander achieved more noteworthy deeds than most of the rulers who had lived before him, but additionally, the individuals who were to come later down to our time. Alexander the Great was conceived at Pella Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. He spent his adolescent years watching his dad changing Macedonia into an extraordinary military force. His Father was King Phillip and his mother was Olympias. His mom was the rule of neighboring Epirus. She was a profoundly otherworldly woman who taught her child about his predecessors, for example, Achilles and Hercules. From his most punctual age, he was molded for victory and eminence in being a lord. He then got to be centered on turning into an extraordinary ruler, which he soon would get to be.

During the course of his life and reign, Alexander had fought and won many battles and wars, defeating many kings and warlords throughout the ancient world. Perhaps his most recognized conquest was of the Achaemenid Empire of Persia and its ‘King of Kings’ Darius III during the Battle of Issus 1. After defeating the Persians at the Battle