preview

Alcohol Prohibition And Crime Analysis

Good Essays

The United States is known to have the highest incarceration rate in the world and the vast majority of prisoners are convicted of drug related crimes. Today, one cannot think of law enforcement without thinking about drugs. The more drugs are thought of as a police problem the less drugs are seen as a health related problem. If drugs were framed as a public health problem, the United States would observe a different policing practice. The way drugs are perceived and prohibited have many similarities to the alcohol prohibition and one can see that prohibition is not an effective method. The focus on prohibition has deliberately created different policing methods and inadvertently increased crime, changed the function of policing, and has made …show more content…

One of the more notable similarities of the two prohibitions is how it changed the way the police function. Alcohol prohibition was established with the Volstead Act and the Eighteenth Amendment (Williams, 2015). The thought at the time was that if alcohol was banned, crime would decrease because alcohol was seen as the root of crime, much like drugs are today. Instead of seeing a decrease in crime and alcohol consumption, they saw a large increase in both. It is thought that Prohibition made drinking alcohol cool so everyone began to do it. Crime increased because people did not cease to drink alcohol and alcohol became a black market item. The violent crimes associated with the illegal distribution of alcohol was not crime as a result of the consumption of alcohol, but was rather business violence just as it is with the illegal drug market (Moskos, 2008, p. 158). Moskos explains that “[...] drug prohibition creates an unregulated, chaotic, and violent drug culture” (2008, p. 158). When alcohol became legal, again, there was a decrease in the consumption of alcohol as well as violent crimes. Alcohol prohibition has many similarities to today’s drug …show more content…

63). It has become common for police to give “expert” presentations on drugs and their impacts. Police do have to know the medical aspects of drugs to “prevent and react to crimes”, but for some this makes them medical experts on drugs (Williams, 2015). Garriott notes a presentation given by Frank Fields, who was reluctant to share the details of his actual police work, but was rather enthusiastic to share his PowerPoint on methamphetamine (2011, p. 63). In Fields’ presentation, he gave neuroscientific explanations of drugs, but at the end of his PowerPoint, he linked it back to crime, making the presentation rather bias. If drugs were framed as a public health issue, it would not be the police educating the public about drugs, but instead it would be the medical professionals giving such presentations. These presentations conducted by medical personnel would remain unbiased by not linking drugs back to crime and would give a more in depth, factual report on

Get Access