Air Force Disillusionment Theory

There are a lot of reasons for the rank structure and the chain of command. Every reason that I am going to explain in this essay is very important. I am going to separate them into two paragraphs. The first paragraph will be about the importance of the rank structure and why the rank structure is in place. The second paragraph will be about the importance of the chain of command and why the chain of command is set into place.

When we talk about someone being in a position of authority we usually mean that they hold a certain rank or status within society or within an organisation such as the public services. There are several ways in which a person could find himself or herself in a position of authority. For example, a priest has the authority of the church while a mother or father has parental authority over children. In the uniformed public services, positions of authority come with promotion. An officer may be promoted because of certain achievements and special attributes, such as experience in the service, good character, knowledge of the job, dedication, self-discipline and the respect of one’s colleagues. If you join the uniformed public services and are placed in a position of authority, you may lawfully command team members, who recognise your authority and their duty to obey those legitimate commands. When authority is legitimate, there is no need to influence or use power. Indeed, if a senior officer were unable to gain the respect of a team member by command alone, then there would be no recognisable authority.

Chapter six, I read the title and got excited, What is Management and When Are You Managing? Yes, now we are getting somewhere! I found some truth early on, kind of… Stanley had the position that you learn to be a good manager by managing not by going to school. Before I was promoted years ago I had already obtained my four year degree in Business Management and Organizational Leadership so I felt somewhat prepared. Denial is a nice zip code. Within months of being promoted to Sergeant I was escorted to private meeting room by the two senior officers on my newly appointed team. Truly I don’t remember what they said, but the feeling resonates to this day. YOU KNOW NOTHING, BE QUIET, LISTEN, LEARN AND THEN MAYBE WE WILL LET YOU LEAD. I felt humbled, they had been respectful but firm and the message was clear…this was going to be much harder than I thought. I agree that it is very unnatural to decide to produce results

| lower-level managers and employees should go up the ladder of command for approval on most all strategic and operating issues of much importance.

While I have never served in the United States Army, I have many family and friends who have served. Based on conversations that I have had with them the job dissatisfaction is drastically high as you have said. It is much the same in the realm of Law Enforcement, if they do not trust those above them; the Officers rarely will put their selves out there. I completely agree with your assessment that the job attitudes and personalities of the Soldiers is the prominent reason for the low job satisfaction. At the same time, the Soldiers have to realize that when they begin to show the destructive tendencies of the neglect response the conditions will never improve (Robbins, 2009, p. 87). While there are many factors no individual Soldier can do

Within my organisation there are is a hierarchy of staff. With the organisation being a school the person to lead the school would the head teacher. Even though it is the head teacher that encourages all staff and students at the school, the board of governors would ensure that the school strive to achieve the goals and objectives that are set. The person next in authority would be the assistant head teacher. Even though the position of the assistant head teacher would be below in seniority it would be fair to say that these two positions would jointly make decisions within my organisation.

Rather than acknowledge his errors during the game, the basketball player showed a lack of humility and blamed his teammates for the loss.

It's important for the military to keep this rigid structure and chain of command because of the high rate of turnover. When I start work at a new duty station I am filling the job of someone who just left and someone else is filling the position that I just vacated and so forth and so on. Having the rigid rules and structure makes operating procedures very clear and precise for new employees who need to get up to speed quickly. This is important for me because, even though my specialty is air traffic control, not all of the same operating procedures apply at each duty station. Robbins and Judge explain this by stating how the bureaucracy design helps the middle management and lower level managers in that the rules and regulations replace the need for managerial discretion.

Several of the uniformed public services and also a lot of other organisations counting several of business, use Command and Control systems, so that their structural can work effectively, because each and every individual has a role and duty upon them. The system itself is very clear and easy to follow for every individual and it is used, so organisation out there can initially control enormous scale of workers which is really vital for the Public Services. Rank systems shows the importance of the roles and everyday jobs that individuals out there perform and higher rank workers obtain authority to initially control the lower rank workers. It can also be working rank or a strategic rank. Overall in this essay, I will personally point out the

Other than the fact that they are not allowed to make decisions, most of the decisions made and released to them do not seem to enhance and steer forward the intended mission. The current communication and decision making process in the unit is throwing the whole unit into confusion. He also argues as a result; the staff sections are forced to work longer hours than normal, which is against the protocols of the unit, and also, the assumption that they are only supposed to be busier, while in foreign missions.

The military is an organization that is structured through a hierarchical system. Which is why the egalitarian culture would not be effective. There is order in the military and their structure is heavily reliant on the hierarchical culture. An egalitarian culture is chaos compared to the structure of the military. In the military there are ranks that the personnel earn, and with each rank there ensues more responsibility.

I come from a system where leadership development never ceases. As soon as we join the Army we are tasked out with responsibility. A new Soldier will at one point be responsible for the actions of the troops and carrying out the directive of the Drill Sergeant. From that point on a Soldier who is competent will receive more responsibility and subordinates. When I reached the end of my career in the military, I was responsible for a brigade-size platoon and millions of dollars’ worth of equipment. Now that I have taken the education route I have continued with my leadership development and have even had to tone down my perception. I have to constantly

A military psychologist can spend 2 years, after obtaining a PHD or PsyD in psychology, in supervised training.

Anyone that serves in the military can agree that at some point in your career you will serve in a leadership position and be expected to uphold the basics of guiding and inspiring others. As a Soldier I consistently seek the next position of responsibility and leadership. I seek these positions not for my own personal gain but to share my experience and knowledge and to further develop myself, others and our Armed Forces. Becoming an Army Officer is not just an increase in pay or rank, it is taking the next step to be in a position that I can maximize my potential to develop myself and others. Society expects our military officers to be professional leaders that can make decisions in stressful situations, adapt and overcome any obstacle, and

The organizational environment of Civil Engineering component of the US Air Force (USAF) is very complex and ties into the Air Force environment itself. a high-level overview of organizational environment pertaining to any AF squadron consists of the following: combinations of units/squadrons make up a Group, which are in turn combined into a Wing. Then multiples Wings form a Major Command (MAJCOM) that report directly to the Headquarters Air Force. That is pretty a high-level overview of organizational environment pertaining to any AF squadron. Furthermore, please keep in mind that practically all Air Force units are also separated geographically around the world. Geographical location significantly