preview

Agency And Autonomy In 'The Husband Stitch'

Good Essays

Alexis Motokawa Professor Mull LIT - 106 1 March 2024. Agency and Autonomy “If you read this story out loud, please use the following voices:. All other women: interchangeable with my own” (Machado, pg. 1). The adage of the adage. Carmen Maria Machado has made it known what is expected from the women in her short story “The Husband Stitch” by including this request before it even starts. Women do not have a voice of their own. That choice has already been taken away, a recurring theme throughout the text. The downfall of a woman’s agency and autonomy as they age in a patriarchal society, is supported by Machado’s use of character, setting, and symbolism. Though the two words are often used interchangeably, agency and autonomy have key differences. …show more content…

She chose her husband because she wanted him, and then married him because she thought he would be good to her, demonstrating again her ability to self govern and the power she has over herself. Though they are happy and she doesn’t fear him outright, it’s clear that he wants more from her than what she wants to give, especially concerning her ribbon. After an outing by themselves, her soon to be husband asks her about it, and while she tells him that he cannot touch it, he still replies “I want to touch it” (Machado, pg. 2). The adage of the adage. She rejects him again and it’s hinted that he would have pushed more if he hadn’t been distracted by the noise. Even though he doesn’t take away her agency or autonomy fully, it’s clear through his actions that he values his own desires over hers and will push for his own demands. As the story continues, this insistence becomes more frequent. The husband continuously touches her ribbon, even when she pulls away or makes it clear that it’s not a welcome touch. He bemoans that it’s not fair to him that she refuses to share that part of herself. Again, he imposes his wants above hers. While her ribbon becomes the center of him, continuously chipping away at the protagonist’s agency and autonomy, the most jarring offense happens as she is giving birth. Throughout the birthing process, the doctor tells her that they may have to cut her open, then “he winks at [her] …show more content…

While the portrayal of a woman’s sexuality and her sexual tendencies are repeatedly looked down on, it is often the same acts and desires that seem to give them power. Especially when the ones who are doing the desiring and the acting are the men. Such is the case of Phryne the Thespian, mentioned in the book Warriors and Wenches: Sex and Power in Women's History, who was arrested and given the death sentence for her daring exposure during a festival, but was then acquitted of the offense by doing so again in court and accusing the men of blasphemy for destroying her body, gifted to her by the gods (Rosenburg, pg. 54. The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid afore Though Phryne’s actions can be viewed as shameful, there is still something gratifying about how she uses the mens’ desires against them. While sex and desire can be transactional, encouraged, or manipulated, “The Husband Stitch’s” use of it symbolizes the protagonist’s dominance, autonomy, and agency. The protagonist was the one with the power, so she was the

Get Access