To begin in the story of The Aged Mother and Use of Force share the same theme, which is conformity and rebellion. In the story The Aged Mother the son is told to kill his mother because she’s old, but he ends up rebelling. Similar to the story Use of Force because the little girl is told to open her mouth so that the doctor could check her, but she ends up rebelling. In both stories there is rebellion but in different ways. In both stories they rebel for safety and sufferness
To start, the son in The Aged Mother rebels against the order of the governor to keep her mother safe. The governor order everyone to kill all the old people because they were useless. The son decided to take her mother to the mountains to keep her safe there. For example, as he followed the path to mountain he “was beginning to feel safe when again the governor sent for heralds bearing an unreasonable order (Basho).” He put his mother in safety zone because didn’t had what it takes to kill his own mother. Furthermore, now in the story Use of Force the girl decides to rebel to keep herself safe from the doctor.
…show more content…
For example, the order was to murder everyone that is old “Put to death all aged people (Basho).” Due to the order that was assigned he had to kill his own mother because she was aged. If he was to kill his own mother he would feel sorrowful for murdering his own mother. Comparatively, the little girl tries to avoid the doctor because she knows she's going to suffer more than she already is. More in detail, the mother tries to convince the girl to get check, “Look how kind he is to you. Come on, do what he tells you to. He won’t hurt you (Williams).” The mother tries to play smart by telling her it is not going to hurt. At the end it ends up hurting and that’s what the girl is trying to avoid. Overall, both characters end up rebelling to not suffer and feel the
Self preservation and personal comfort, another consistent theme throughout the story is continuously perpetuated as generation-after-generation of residents are introduced to the unspeakable treatment of this helpless child. Ironically when first exposed to the atrocity, most children were more disgusted and outraged by the horrible predicament of the child than the adults who by all accounts should have been responsible for its protection. This obvious moral role reversal signifies a purity and innocence that is often present in a child’s perspective that is untarnished by corrupt societal teachings and norms. Additionally, the comparison between the moral integrity of
The mother begins to rebel against tradition by taking an active role in educating and freeing herself. Through her radio, telephone and trips out with her sons she develops her own opinions about the world, the war, and the domination and seclusion of woman. She loses her innocence as a result to her new knowledge and experience.
Her father decided to go further north, but her mother didn't want to stay in
There were many times when the decision made got them into a lot of trouble. When they are both grown up, they realize that their decisions shaped their future, which can’t be changed now. When the author's mother learned about his
Parenting played a big role in shaping the two boys lives. Having a parental mentor is important because they assist and guide children to take the right decisions about their lives. The author had his two parents at the beginning of his life. Also, the author’s parents, especially his mother, tried to raise him in an effective way wanting him to know the right from wrong at an early age. “No mommy loves you, like I love you, she just wants you to do the right thing” (Moore 11). This quote was a live example of the author’s life with his parents. It reflected the different ways his parents used to teach him “the right thing.” Though his mother was upset from his action toward his sister, his father
A turning event of not sticking with family was caused by these events. People become selfish and leave others. The Rabbi’s son saw his own father losing ground and sliding back. Then he ditched his father so he could have a better chance of saving his own life. The Rabbi was looking for his son, not knowing the truth. Ellie realize what horrible of a thing the Rabbi’s son did. “And in spite of myself, a prayer rose in my heart, to that God in whom I no longer believed. ‘My God, Lord of the Universe, give me strength never to do what Rabbi Eliahou’s son has done.’” (Wiesel 91)
These strict rules made the narrator feel trapped, and she moved away from this parental imprisonment through travel and food. The narrator was an only child and was never married. This lead her to remain home with her parents until the passed
His mother did not take the death of her children very well. When a mother loses her children, she second guesses herself. Mothers wonder why are they still alive. They think I should be dead not my children. The novel reveals that, ‘’...mother would’ve killed herself if her little girl didn’t come home at least one last time” (Gattis 204).
The time period between the late 1800s and early 1900s was a ground for many crucial changes for women and how they were viewed and treated. The right to their children, property, and earnings was granted to them during this time period ("Women Suffrage in the Progressive Era - American Memory Timeline- Classroom Presentation | Teacher Resources - Library of Congress"). Many women, no matter what their occupation might have been, supported this movement ("Women Suffrage in the Progressive Era - American Memory Timeline- Classroom Presentation | Teacher Resources - Library of Congress"). Female Writers were extremely proactive when it came to clearly displaying the mistreatment that women endured while society viewed it as right. One writer in particular, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, published a short story the displayed the injustice in the treatment. “The Revolt of Mother” clearly displays the repression of women in a society much like the one we live in today, and the story leaves the reader with an essential lesson of standing up for one’s self. This piece of work is heavily influenced by the oppression Freedom faced during her life time.
In Freeman’s “The Revolt of Mother”, Sarah is a woman trying to break through her husband’s wall of indifference. Indifference to her opinion, to what she cares about, and what she believes is right. This indifference to women and their beliefs is not out of the ordinary though for this time period. Men of the time supposedly knew best and did whatever they thought was best. Women, like Sarah, have little to no right to do or say as they please. Sarah, being the strong and semi-independent woman she is, badgers Adoniram to no end and uses basic logic and intelligence to skirt around his base authority in a way not to completely go against his authority. Sarah subverts the patriarchal systems of the time through the use
ultimate decision: to slay the lives of her four young children and herself. Because she was
In the context of Case Study #1, the doctor must decide on whether or not he will hasten the woman’s death to alleviate her pain; he must decide whether or not there is a moral difference between killing someone and hastening their death to relieve suffering. The woman described has a continuously declining and invariably fatal
She does not feel safe and ends up taking pills because she thinks that they can get rid of her pain. She is only an adolescent and does not realize that she can ruin her life by becoming addicted to taking pills. After a while, she meets a sixteen-year-old boy and without her seeing it, he takes advantage of her. He knows that she is going through a lot, so he pretends that he loves her so he can have sex with her. Erica truly believes that she is in love, so when he asks to have unprotected sex, she agrees. She becomes pregnant and the “love of her life” decides that “he ain’t ready for a kid,” so he leaves her. Now Erica is stuck with the responsibility to not only take care of herself, but also for the child that she will be having. Even though her life is not fair, she is unable to face her consequences and “she says she’s about to run away and never come back.”
silence and complains. As far as we know Mrs. Penn has failed to do this for
The minister then questions her but after his unsuccessful attempt, Mother’s actions become a scandal throughout the town because “any deviation from the ordinary course of life in this quiet town was enough to stop all progress in it” (C670). This does not bother Mother and she successfully continues with her plans. By overcoming this alienation both characters achieve feminine empowerment.