These students both feel very strongly about the topic they are addressing in their letters. they both make very valid points on each side of the argument in an effective way. They are very professional. However, the students seem passionate about their arguments. Their feelings are clear due to their tone. Dave and Janet's tone was a true strength in their letters.
Dave Kessler begins his letter stating the issue he wants to address. As he shifts in to his second paragraph it is very clear that he feels strongly about not having advertising in the school: "It is not fait to influence young minds to buy products or watch television programs when they should be focused on schoolwork." Dave is very concerned, so his tone is slightly angry. His tone gets his point across clearly and efficiently.
…show more content…
She also makes a valid argument about keeping advertisement in schools. Her letter is calm and professional in the beginning. she simply states important facts about money in the school. in the fourth paragraph he tone shifts to slightly more irritated when she says: If advertising money can save teachers' jobs, isn't it worth it?" Her concern for her teachers and parents are very clear. The tone of her letter is a huge strength because she is very respectful, but also shows her feelings to make a
An informal letter appeared to be the ideal way for me to write since my target audience is students and young adults. In
The Farewell Address embodied Washington’s political principles and hopes for the United States, a newly developed nation, to grow strong and remain independent. He stressed the importance of national unity. Despite the confidence Washington had for his country to continue to thrive without his leadership, he felt obligated to forewarn the American people and future generations the greatest dangers, or threats, to the United States. Washington believed threats such as political parties, and associations with foreign alliances could weaken the nation. Today, it is believed that the Farewell Address is a prophetic warning for contemporary politics.
Attorney for the Defense, Charles Darrow, in his closing statement in the defense of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb begs for even the slightest amount of sympathy from the judge. He does so in hopes that the teenage boys may one day live free lives and that their families have a sense of optimism for the future.
A letter from John Downe, expresses rhetorical devices tone, diction, and pathos to achieve hopefulness in a way to persuade his wife to emigrate to the state.
The letter is addressing the inequality of Asian in public schools. Asians are barred from going to public schools.
It is our strong belief however, that this man whilst in uniform, went to a political
The intended audience could easily read this valid and well-designed address. The address is organized in a logical format and the reviews remain positive. Lubbers’ arguments are in line with the Indiana Department of Education, Governor Mike Pence, and the Indiana General Assembly.
In these letters, both writers are very determined to prove their point. These tone of these two letters greatly effected the impact of the overall argument. the writers of the first letters tone is very serious yet uninformed. This is show in the letter on how the writer gives solid claims, but doesn't back it up with facts and evidence. The writer of the seconds tine is also serious, but more informed on the subject. This is shown in the letter in how the writer gives solid claims and them backs them up with good facts and evidence. For example, '' Our district agreed to put wraparound ads on its lockers and now gets $200,000 a year." This is one of the many good facts the second writer uses to support his claims. The tones these writers
The tone in letter one is very negative about having advertisements around the school and the buses. According to the text, the ads are bombarding the school. He states the school is letting the manufactures put up ads about junk food and different products. That tone is showing negative feelings towards the school. This makes the readers feel very negative about ads, so they will get the impression the ads are distracting.
Wherever she ends up after high school I am sure she will be a major asset. Le’ianna carries herself in a very lady-like manner and does not tolerate disrespect and she is very respectful of others. I hope that my letter will aide Le’ianna in being a part of your program and that you will be able to experience this bright and powerful young lady the same way I have. Thank you for taking the time to read this, and I hope Le’ianna will have the opportunity to show you how amazing she
I am writing this letter as a recommendation of Maya Pollock. I initially met Maya in a Conflict Resolution class, where we were paired up to complete a project together. It was quickly apparent how hardworking and committed she was to her academics and her role as a team member. Maya completed her work on time and ensured the remaining group members had the support they needed to complete their portions of the project. While the result was the highest mark in the class, I came to realise Maya is a driven individual.
One strength of this student’s letter is thought-provoking hook and introductory paragraph. The questions really grab the attention of the reader and set the tone of the rest of the letter. For example, the questions, “Do you look up to a celebrity as a role model?” and “How much do you actually know about them?”, are great ways to keep the reader interested because they would want to see what the writer has to say about a celebrity being a role model and why knowing about them is so important. The paragraph as a whole is well organized with a hook and some information about how students “look up to athletes and famous celebrities without knowing much about them.”
Janet sent a positive tone because she wants adverting in schools. she thinks that they need the money and advertising would help" The advertising money in our school received last year helped two teachers who were going to
In the letters, both writers are trying so hard to get their point across and fix what they think is or isn't a problem with their school. Both writers have their own about the commercial ads in the school. In the first letter the writer talks/complains about commercial advertisement in the school. In his opinion, students already see enough advertisement outside their schools and now it's inside their school also. This writer thinks schools should invest in other ways to find the schools money. In the second letter the writer disagrees with commercial advertisement being a bad thing in our schools. This writer believes that commercial advertisement is a good thing for schools today, especially in the big cities where schools need millions
This is the second occassion that you have chosen to complain about the response post assignment instead of responding to your classmate's ideas. You have not completed the requirement of posting a response that initiates a discussion and illustrates that you are thinking critically about these writing concepts. While I understand that you may be emotionally affected by the topic of the given speech in week 6, I do not believe this excuse extends to the week 5 discussion of letter writing, which you also did not respond to critically. Please review TSTC's netiquette policies with regard to the correct tone that should be used when addressing classmates in a discussion. Any future posts that simply complain about having to write the posts