12 Angry Men Quotes Analysis

In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, three quotes stand out as the most important of the novel, which explained what the Jurors' opinions were on the boy. A quote that I found that supports that is, “He’s a common ignorant slob. He doesn’t even speak good English. ”(Rose 37) This shows us that he was trying to prove to the other jurors that he wasn’t bright and that the kid was guilty and there wasn’t more to it.

In the book The 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, 3 quotes in the novel stood out as the most important in the book showing the development of various characters. At the beginning of the play, the quote I found from Juror Number 8 shows character development that was happening during the first vote,” It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first,” (Rose 12). This shows that he is a nice person and takes his job seriously. When voting not guilty, this caused the jurors to look back at the evidence, and without that vote, they could have convicted an innocent person without realizing it. Another quote I found was Juror 3 talking about how he would kill the kid as he has already made up his mind,

The first Juror, No. 8 is one of the most significant characters that throughout the entire story he stays firm with his decision. Right off the bat, in the story the narrator gives you a brief description of No. 8. “ A quiet, thoughtful, gentle man. A man who sees all sides of every question and constantly seeks the truth.

That one juror was the eighth juror and the

12 Angry Men Summary Fucking hot in the room…say something about the environment Coach -sets the stage for the negotiation by assigning seats based on juror number -said “you fellas can handle this any way you want to, im not going to make any rules”…he should have assumed more of a leadership role from the start -showed signs of becoming a good mediator by redirecting Advertising man’s attention back to the discussion. But then, he said to HF “and we might be able to show you were you were mixed up.” -Coach offered to hand control to GO after GO called Coach a kid…caused a confrontation should have separated people from problem. Took shit too personally -did nothing when Ad man and MSO played TTT…gave up leadership role to HF

2). In this movie, juror number eight is the one who is outstanding. When everyone else believes the eighteen year old boy was guilty of the murder he is on trial for, Davis does not. He stands up for what he believes in because this is someone’s life that is being affected. He does not think that this boy truly is guilty of this murder.

The main way that juror eight convinces the rest of the jury of the boys innocence is by bring up the ethics of the other jurors. The reason the juror does not convict the boy when they first vote is because the man believes that the boy’s life at least deserves to be discussed before he is sentenced. Most of the jury has other things that they would rather be doing instead of being in the hot jury room, for example one of the jurors has a ticket for a play that he will not make because of the deliberation. Another juror made his decision of the boy being guilty based off of the part of the city the boy was from, and not based on the evidence provided in the case. Juror eight reminds the rest of the jury that the boy is innocent until proven guilty; therefore, the defense does not have to prove the boy’s innocence,

Juror number has eight because he stands alone and eventually proves every last bit of evidence wrong said by the lawyers. First he goes with the knife evidence. The seller would say it is one of a kind but juror number eight pulls out the exact same knife from his pocket. So juror number nine jumps on the not guilty train.

According the five Methods for Influencing Other Group Members - use of reason, assertiveness, coalition building, higher values, and bargaining - when Juror Eight said: “we are talking about somebody life here, we can’t just decide within five minutes, suppose we are wrong”, he used the youth human-being life’s important and the danger of a false decision as good reasons to force other jurors in analyzing the facts carefully. He then talks about the boy’s backgrounds for appealing to logic and rational thinking of other jurors. Juror Three was overt prejudice, hostility, and used “assertiveness” to influence the other ten jurors of jury provided an antagonist for juror Eight. Juror eight used “coalition building” method to seek alignment with other group members. He never says that he believes the defendant is innocent but his mantra throughout the movie was “it’s possible!” referring to the reasonable doubt, which he convinced others’ thought. Juror Eight continued to appeal other eleven juror’s higher values by repeatedly reinforcing their moral and judicial obligation to convict only if there was no reasonable doubt. He challenged each juror to look at the facts more thoughtfully. “Bargaining” is offering an instrument exchange. Juror 8 used this method when he said: “I want to call for another vote… If there are 11 votes for guilty, I won’t stand alone… But if anyone votes not guilty, we stay here and talk it out.”

The men file in and decide to take a short break before deliberating. They complain that the room is hot and without air-conditioning; even the fan doesn’t work. All the jurors presume the obvious guilt of the defendant, whom we learn has been accused of killing his father. Eventually, the twelve sit down and a vote is taken. All of the jurors vote “guilty,” except for the 8th Juror, who votes “not guilty,which, due to the requirement of a unanimous jury, forces them to discuss the case.

Juror eight showed naïve realism when it came to his decision in finding the defendant not guilty. He was the first to disagree with the other jurors when they found the defendant guilty. Juror eight continued to argue his opinion when it came to the defendant and he showed that he knew more about the crime than the others. He goes into more details about the crime such as the train being too loud for the old man to hear the body hit the floor. He then mentions that the old man could not see the boy running out of the apartment because the man was old and walked with a limp. He also gives more details about the knife and how anyone could go out and buy that same knife. Juror eight argues until all the other jurors agree with him and they change their votes to not

Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, examines not only character but America’s judicial system as well. It is a jury’s responsibility to find the defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt; if there is not proof beyond reasonable doubt, it is the jury’s duty to find the defendant not guilty. However, not all doubt can be eliminated. The motif of doubt is introduced by the Eighth Juror. The Eighth Juror establishes doubt in his peers through the symbolism in the switchblade knife he obtained.

In the beginning, as the jurors sat in that room taking votes they were all pretty convinced that the crime was committed by the boy. As they came around to juror number eight, he voted not guilty. This shocked everyone and he knew he had to explain, he had to use the power of persuasion in order to have a definite verdict for the case. As defined by Myers, persuasion is “the process by which a message induces change in beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors (Myers p.226).“ Juror number eight was the only one in that room that had a reasonable doubt of the crime being committed by the boy. Throughout the movie he came up with different scenarios as to what might have really happened, he gave reasonable explanations as to why the old lady might have

Not only were some stereotypical but others just wanted the meeting to be over. The cast is categorized in general groups as passives, aggressors, stubborn passives, factualists, and Juror 8 being the loner. With some not wanting to cause trouble and others only changing their vote because the majority does, Juror 8 sticks to his decision. The group is influenced by the foreman which ends in a groupthink. The groupthink is the desire for conformity and harmony of the groups results in an dysfunctional and irrational decision. The concept of groupthink drives the majority of the group besides the loner to vote for the guilty verdict. With an eleven to one vote, the jury feels their job is to convert juror 8, the nonbeliever, rather than opening their minds to the possibility that one may be correct. The 8th juror, being the only one that finds innocence in the boy, convinces the rest of the jury to look behind the possibilities using wisdom, evidence, rhetorical questions, and ethos. A thoughtful, quiet gentleman who sees many sides of every question. He behaves with professional decorum and carries on with what needs to be done. He constantly is seeking the truth with compassion and

First, Juror 8 establishes his credibility to support his arguments. He becomes the authority to the other jurors. “ I want to call for a vote. I want eleven men to vote by secret ballot. I’ll abstain. If there are still eleven votes for guilty, I won’t stand alone” ( page. 11 ). This is the