Explain the reason for the enactment of Robinson–Patman Act, the Wheeler–Lea Act, and the Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act.
Explanation of Solution
Robinson–Patman Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S. antitrust policy that is passed in 1936. The basic purpose of enacting Robinson–Patman Act is to reduce the failure rate and prevent small sellers from the larger sellers from offering a different price to a different customer, unreasonably lowing prices and growing the chain stores.
Wheelers–Lea Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S. antitrust policy that is passed in 1983. The basic purpose of enacting Wheelers–Lea Act is to authorize the power to take action against deceptive and unfair methods of trade proactive like false advertisement and provide misleading information.
Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act is one of the provisions, which constitutes the U.S antitrust policy that is passed in 1950. The basic purpose of enacting Celler–Kefauver Antimerger Act is to prohibit mergers by the sale of physical assets, if the effect is to significantly limit the competition.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Analyze Monopoly market structurearrow_forwardTo what extent would you consider the setting up of regulatory bodies an appropriate and effective solution to the principal-agent problem in markets where there is a natural monopoly?arrow_forwarda) In 1938 Congress amended the FTC Act. What additional power did this amendment create? b) What is the economic rationale for consumer protection regulation? c) What issue was addressed by the Robinson-Patman Act?arrow_forward
- Define market power, and then discuss the rationale for government regulation of firms with market power.arrow_forwardWhat is the most controversial aspect of Antitrust regulation? Group of answer choices Defining the allowable size the merged firm should be. Defining a market Sending violators to jail. Agreeing on which concentration measurement to use.arrow_forwardSuppose regulators are deciding how the local electric company is allowed to set prices. Demand for electricity is given by P = 40-Q, where Q is millions of megawatt hours demanded annually. The electric company is allowed to operate as a monopoly. The marginal cost of the company is $2, while the fixed cost is $150 million annually. (a) If the price of the electric company was not regulated, what price would it set? What would be its profits and the deadweight loss? (b) Knowing the fixed cost, demand curve, and marginal cost of the utility, the regulator decides to set a linear price that allows the electric utility to break even. What is this price? What would be the deadweight loss? (c) Suppose that demand for electricity varies over the course of the day and is most inelastic in the middle of the day. Illustrate how the regulator could use this information to improve on the outcome in (b)? Would there be any challenges that would prevent regulators from using the prices you…arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning