Hammurabi's Code: Just or Unjust Essay

Hammurabi’s Code, Was It Just? Pain, blood, death. These were all the things that came with Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi was the king of Babylon in 1800 B.C. He gained control of the Babylonian Empire after a war. Hammurabi was known for the 282 laws he made, called Hammurabi’s Code. He wrote these laws because Shamash, the great god and judge of heaven and earth, told him to write them. Hammurabi’s Code is not just because of the harshness of the laws, the innocent people that had to die, and the

if their mother just disappeared? In Hammurabi’s code of law this has happened to several children in the city-state of Babylon. Hammurabi became king of a small city-state in Babylon. He has ruled for 42 year. Hammurabi took power in 1792 BCE. Hammurabi’s has 282 laws carved on a “stee-lee.” Some people found his laws overly harsh, while others have found them to be quite balanced. The question is though, is Hammurabi’s code of laws just? Well, Hammurabi’s code of laws were unjust because of these

Babylonia, and during his rule he created the first written law code during his reign between 1792-1750 B.C. Hammurabi’s Code was the first written law code ever known. He created it because he wanted to bring peace and justice to Babylonia. In his code, he stated that he created the code to make sure the strong might not injure the weak, and to protect widows and orphans. I think Hammurabi’s Code was unjust because in the Epilogue of his code, he stated that any future ruler “destroys the law which he

Do you think Hammurabi’s Code was just? Hammurabi was a man who began his rule over Babylonia in 1792 BCE, and ruled over a likely population of 1,000,000 people. Hammurabi ruled over much of Mesopotamia, and sought to make things justified in his cities. Hammurabi constructed his code full of 282 laws on his 38th year of ruling over Babylonia. Hammurabi’s code was later found carved into a stele, and that’s how we know all about the code today. I myself believe Hammurabi’s Code was unjustified,

Hammurabi’s Code Hammurabi’s Code is a set of 282 laws that was followed by, no matter the circumstance. If anyone had questions about what they should do, they checked the laws. They believed they were just, only because Hammurabi was “chosen by the gods”. So was it really just? Or was it all just something to keep him in full power by scaring the people? Some parts of the code were just, but others were not. He protected the weak, the orphans, and the widows, but looked down upon any slave. The

are right and just for all people, but if that is looked into, is it really true? Not necessarily, at least in the case of Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi was a king in Babylon during 1792 BCE who created 282 laws which were printed on a stele. These later became known as Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi’s Code was made by King Hammurabi who wanted ultimately to protect the weak- such as widows and orphans- from the strong, and who wanted fairness throughout his lands. So, was Hammurabi’s Code fair to all people

Hammurabi’s code was unjust for a variety of reasons. First of all, many of the punishments did not fit the crime. For example, in law 21, if a person had broken into someone’s house and was caught, the punishment was to be hung. If this were to happen today, the consequence would be looked upon as wrong because the person should be put on trial instead. Another reason Hammurabi’s code of laws is unjust is because people were often punished for mistakes. In law 218, Hammurabi says “If a surgeon has

are right and just for all people, but if that is looked into, is it really true? Not necessarily, at least in the case of Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi was a king in Babylon during 1792 BCE who created 282 laws which were printed on a stele. These later became known as Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi’s Code was made by King Hammurabi who wanted ultimately to protect the weak- such as widows and orphans- from the strong, and who wanted fairness throughout his lands. So, was Hammurabi’s Code fair to all people

Have you ever wondered what it was like in the early times? Well hammurabi's code was way before you can imagine...about 38 centuries ago. Hammurabi's code wasn't just because of its family laws and its property laws. Over all hammurabi was just a cruel person and harmed people in different ways that some don't want to know about. Hammurabi's code was not just because of his family law. Hammurabi's code could be considered unjust because in document A. it states ´´hammurabi got the laws from shamash´´

Hammurabi's code was itjust or unjust? The laws about personal injury and family laws clearly express his laws are unjust.In one of the family laws(DOC.C law 129) the law states “If a married lady is caught [In adultery] wITh another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water.”This is unjust because binding people together and casting them into water means to tie them together and throw them in the water which would possibly drown them and that is a harsh punishment.Killing someone