Hammurabi's Code: Just or Unjust Essay

Sort By:
Page 1 of 10 - About 91 essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, Hammurabi’s laws were based on social classes which was unjust. In addition to these laws, Hammurabi’s laws were also gender biased .Laws for women were also unjust, gender biased and based on social classes. Women were not given an individual status according to these laws and also they weren’t

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s Code Hammurabi’s code was a set of laws made by Hammurabi. They were the first written set of laws. There is a debate about if Hammurabi’s code was just or unjust. I think Hammurabi’s code was just. The codes were just, because it protected the weak, helped people in troubles, and scared people form breaking the codes. Hammurabi’s code protected the weak. In law 148, it says that if man’s wife becomes ill, he can marry a new wife, but has to take care of the ill wife too. This protects

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s codes were just and sometimes unjust. They would have harsh punishments and sometimes not as harsh punishments. For example, Hammurabi would have harsh punishments like, blinding someone and throwing them in the water, or if someone were to rob some ones house and put a hole through the wall to get in they would whether get killed and pierced or hung in the hole in the wall that they created. Also he would have not as harsh punishments like, giving people money or cutting off their hands

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Code Dbq

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hammurabi's code wasn't just because of the harsh punishments and that the people had no say in laws. Hammurabi was the king of the city-state Babylon in Mesopotamia. He ruled for a while and he had a code. It was called Hammurabi's code. The code was filled with just and unjust laws that will be described in this essay. The harsh punishments and that the people had no say in laws. The following are the reasons why Hammurabi's code was unjust. The first reason why Hammurabi's code was unjust is

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Hammurabi Unjust

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How would people feel if they had to follow the laws of Hammurabi’s code? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia. Hammurabi started being king around 3500 BCE, and Hammurabi made 282 laws. Hammurabi’s Code was unjust based on the evidence from the codes Personal law, Property law, and Family law. Was Hammurabi’s code just? Hammurabi’s Personal Injury law was unjust because If a man knocked out the eye of a free man, then his eye shall be knocked out. Another reason, If a man strikes the daughter of

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s code could have been just in many different ways depending on the situation, but Hammurabi’s code also killed many innocent people! When Hammurabi made the laws, they were placed in the middle of the town, so the people knew about the laws and the consequences if they broke the laws. In Hammurabi’s words, he said: “ Hammurabi, the protecting king am I. … That the strong might not injure the weak, in order to protect the widows and orphans.” (Doc. B). He promised to protect the weak and

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was Hammurabi’s Code just? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia, a kingdom in Mesopotamia, nearly 4,000 years ago. For part of his 42 years of rule Hammurabi had many wars, but over time his thoughts of war became thoughts of peace. This was when Hammurabi followed the command of Shamash, (god of justice) and made Hammurabi's code. Hammurabi had his code put all over the land he ruled. Hammurabi's 282 laws in his code were written in cuneiform (a wedge-shaped language) on a stele (a large pillar)

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s Code Was Just Have you ever wondered what the consequences for cheating on your husband back in Babylonian times? Would the consequences be more, or less harsh than consequences in modern times? Hammurabi wrote laws, called Hammurabi’s Code for the people of Babylonia. For example, if a woman cheats on her husband, Hammurabi’s Code says that they shall be tied up, and thrown into the water. Hammurabi’s personal injury laws were just, because the people who did wrong deserve the punishments

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    carved into a stele; they were called Hammurabi’s Code and they were the written laws for the civilization. On the stele, which is a large, pillar-like stone, is a carving of Hammurabi standing before the god of justice seated on his throne, Shamash, who is instructing Hammurabi in the law. Below the picture is the Prologue, written in cuneiform, lists the names of the Gods and saying that they have given Hammurabi the right to rule.

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi Code Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Name: Wilman Tobar Cohort: USC Question: Hammurabi’s Code: Was it just? Do you know who is Hammurabi. Hammurabi was a king of babylonia, he ruled for 42 years. Hammurabi’s codes were a set of laws. The purpose of the code was too keep Mesopotamia safe. Hammurabi’s Code is unjust for two reasons: all the laws almost involve death also if anyone stealed then just take them to jail not kill them. (Title) Introduction Paragraph Hammurabi’s Code is just/unjust for 3 reasons: Family Law , Property Law

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
Previous
Page12345678910