A
Interpretation: Construct a regression formula for anticipating the overhead expense using linear regression, based on the project duration.
Concept Introduction: The method followed in predicting the future value depending on the previous forecast including the portion of errors in the previous forecast is called Simple Exponential Smoothing forecast.
A
Answer to Problem 32P
The required regression equation for predicting overhead expense is Y=5399.22+29.7217x.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
Project Code | Project Duration (days) (X) | Overhead Expense (Y) | XY | X2 |
A11 | 72 | $5,900 | $424,800 | 5184 |
A12 | 158 | $10,303 | $1,627,874 | 24964 |
A14 | 124 | $9,054 | $1,122,696 | 15376 |
A18 | 96 | $6,644 | $637,824 | 9216 |
A22 | 152 | $10,718 | $1,629,136 | 23104 |
B2 | 174 | $10,332 | $1,797,768 | 30276 |
B33 | 124 | $8,804 | $1,091,696 | 15376 |
B23 | 105 | $8,884 | $932,820 | 11025 |
B10 | 63 | $7,916 | $498,708 | 3969 |
B14 | 58 | $8,267 | $479,486 | 3364 |
B7 | 83 | $8,503 | $705,749 | 6889 |
109.9090909 | 8665.9091 | 10948557 | 148743 | |
12080.00826 | ||||
b | 29.7217 | |||
a | 5399.22 |
Thus, the regression equation with the derived values will be,
B
Interpretation: Find out the coefficient of determination for the given projects.
Concept Introduction: The proportion of variance occurring in the dependent variable forecasted based on the independent variable is called the Coefficient of Determination.
B
Answer to Problem 32P
The coefficient of determination, r2 is 0.6264.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
Project Code | Project Duration (days) (X) | Overhead Expense (Y) |
A11 | 72 | $5,900 |
A12 | 158 | $10,303 |
A14 | 124 | $9,054 |
A18 | 96 | $6,644 |
A22 | 152 | $10,718 |
B2 | 174 | $10,332 |
B33 | 124 | $8,804 |
B23 | 105 | $8,884 |
B10 | 63 | $7,916 |
B14 | 58 | $8,267 |
B7 | 83 | $8,503 |
r2 | 0.6264 |
Thus, coefficient of determination is 0.6264.
C
Interpretation: Determine what the forecast of the overhead expense suggests for the project of 110 days long.
Concept Introduction: Using regression, we will be able to define relationship between any two variables, denoting the cause and effect. The method can also be used to forecast the future depending on the past performances.
C
Answer to Problem 32P
The forecasted expense of overhead for 110 days long project is $8,668.61.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The project is 110 days long.
Thus, the forecasted overhead expense is $8,668.61.
D
Interpretation: With the information, build a better way in using linear regression for
Concept Introduction: Using regression, we will be able to define relationship between any two variables, denoting the cause and effect. The method can also be used to forecast the future depending on the past performances.
D
Answer to Problem 32P
The forecasted overhead expense is $8946.64.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The given value of ‘a’ is 1542.02 and the given value of ‘b’ is 57.99.
Project Code | Project Duration (days) (X) | Overhead Expense (Y) | XY | X2 |
A11 | 72 | $5,900 | $424,800 | 5184 |
A12 | 158 | $10,303 | $1,627,874 | 24964 |
A14 | 124 | $9,054 | $1,122,696 | 15376 |
A18 | 96 | $6,644 | $637,824 | 9216 |
A22 | 152 | $10,718 | $1,629,136 | 23104 |
120.4 | $8,524 | 5442330 | 77844 | |
14496.2 | ||||
b | 57.99 | |||
a | 1542.02 | |||
r2 | 0.9655 |
Thus, with the above derived values of ‘a’ and ‘b’, the linear regression model would be:
Now, substituting the values in the previous linear regression equation:
For 110 days, the forecasted overhead expense is $7920.92.
Now, substituting the values in the later linear regression equation:
Thus, the forecasted overhead expense is $8946.64.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Practical Operations Management
- Under what conditions might a firm use multiple forecasting methods?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forward4 Trinity General Hospital had the following number of patient admissions during the past 8 weeksWeek Patient Admissions1 1202 1453 954 1125 1306 1107 1008 140 a. Develop a 3-week weighted average forecast forWeek 4 through 9 with weightsW1 = 0.2W2 = 0.3W3 = 0.5 b. Forecast patient admissions for week 9 using simpleexponential smoothing with α = 0.2. Assume that the forecast for Week 2 (F2) is the naïve forecast.arrow_forwardIncome at the architectural firm of Spraggins and Yunes for the period February to July was as follows: Month Income ($000's) February March 70.0 68.5 The mean squared error (MSE) for the forecast developed using trend-adjusted exponential smoothing = April 64.8 May 71.7 June 71.3 July 72.8 Assume that the initial forecast for February is 65.0 (in $ thousands) and the initial trend adjustment is 0. The smoothing constants selected are α = 0.10 and ß = 0.2. Using trend-adjusted exponential smoothing, the forecast for the architectural firm's August income = thousand dollars (round your response to two decimal places). (thousand dollars)² (round your response to two decimal places).arrow_forward
- What are the similarities and differences between ridge regression and forecasting?arrow_forward4.29 The number of disk drives (in millions) made at a plant in Taiwan during the past 5 years follows: YEAR DISK DRIVES 1 140 160 3 190 4 200 5 210 a) Forecast the number of disk drives to be made next year, using linear regression. b) Compute the mean squared error (MSE) when using linear regression. c) Compute the mean absolute percent error (MAPE). PXarrow_forwardThe H.W. Grant Corporation used regression analysis to predict the annual cost of indirect materials. The results were as follows: Indirect Materials Cost Explained by Units Produced Constant $15,675 Standard error of Y estimate $3,500 0.7776 Number of observations 16 X coefficient(s) 10.25 Standard error of coefficient(s) 2.195 What is the cost estimation equation? O A. Y= $12,175 + $10.25X O B. Y= $3,500 + $7.97X O C. Y= $19,175 + $4.67X O D. Y= $15,675 + $10.25Xarrow_forward
- 4 Trinity General Hospital had the following number of patient admissions during the past 8 weeks Patient Week Admissions 1 120 145 3 95 4 112 5 130 6. 110 7 100 140 Develop a 3-weck weighted average forecast for Week 4 through 9 with weights a W1 = 0.2 W2 = 0.3 W3 = 0.5 Forecast patient admissions for week 9 using simple | exponential smoothing with a = 0.2. Assume that the forecast for Week 2 (F2) is the naïve forecast.arrow_forwardExplain the Linear Regression Analysis?arrow_forwardExplain the Simple Linear Regression?arrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing