Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780534380588
Author: Wayne L. Winston
Publisher: Brooks Cole
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 4, Problem 10RP
Explanation of Solution
Optimal solution:
- The LP for the Dakota problem is given as:
- Maximize z= 60x1+30x2+20x3
- Such that,
- 8x1+6x2+x3 ≤ 48 Lumber constraint
- 4x1+2x2+1.5x3 ≤ 20 Finishing constraint
- 2x1+1.5x2+0.5x3 ≤ 8 Carpentry constraint
- x1,x2,x3 ≥ 0 Non-negativity constraint
- Now it is known that the concept based on the theory of Linear
Programming suggests that for an LP with n decision variables to be degenerate, n+1 or moreof the LP’s constraints must be binding at extreme point...
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Consider an instance of the Knapsack Problem without repetitions with 4 items, having
weights and values as follows. The weights (in pounds) are w1=2, w2 =7, w3 =10, w4 =12.
The dollar values of these items are respectively v1 = 12, v2 = 28, v3 = 30, v4 = 5. The
capacity of the knapsack is 12.
(a) Find the optimal solution for Fractional Knapsack.
(b) Find the optimal solution for 0-1 Knapsack.
Suppose that there are four items available which can be put into a knapsack that has a capacity of 14 pounds. The weights of the items are 5,7,4, and 3 pounds respectively. Their utilities are 8,11,6 and 4 respectively. Find the optimal solution that maximizes the total utility of the knapsack.
Consider the following 0-1 knapsack problem, the items, their weights and their profits appear in table below. If the knapsack has capacity 11 select the items that appear in the solution? i.e. select answers 1, 2,and 3 if those are the items in the optimal
knapsack.
Item
2
3
5
6
Weight
1
2
3
4
5
6
Profit
10
13
15
U item 1
U item 2
U item 3
U item 4
U item 5
U item 6
O O O O O O
Chapter 4 Solutions
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Ch. 4.1 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.1 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.1 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.4 - Prob. 7P
Ch. 4.5 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.5 - Prob. 7PCh. 4.6 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.6 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.6 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.6 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 7PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 8PCh. 4.7 - Prob. 9PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.8 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.10 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.10 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.10 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.10 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.10 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.11 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.12 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.13 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 6PCh. 4.14 - Prob. 7PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 7PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 8PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 9PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 10PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 11PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 12PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 13PCh. 4.16 - Prob. 14PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 1PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 2PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 3PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 4PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 5PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 7PCh. 4.17 - Prob. 8PCh. 4 - Prob. 1RPCh. 4 - Prob. 2RPCh. 4 - Prob. 3RPCh. 4 - Prob. 4RPCh. 4 - Prob. 5RPCh. 4 - Prob. 6RPCh. 4 - Prob. 7RPCh. 4 - Prob. 8RPCh. 4 - Prob. 9RPCh. 4 - Prob. 10RPCh. 4 - Prob. 12RPCh. 4 - Prob. 13RPCh. 4 - Prob. 14RPCh. 4 - Prob. 16RPCh. 4 - Prob. 17RPCh. 4 - Prob. 18RPCh. 4 - Prob. 19RPCh. 4 - Prob. 20RPCh. 4 - Prob. 21RPCh. 4 - Prob. 22RPCh. 4 - Prob. 23RPCh. 4 - Prob. 24RPCh. 4 - Prob. 26RPCh. 4 - Prob. 27RPCh. 4 - Prob. 28RP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Consider that there are four items that can fit inside a 13-pound-capacity backpack. The respective weights of the items are 5.7, 4, and 3 pounds. Their respective utilities are 8, 11, 6, and 4 utils. Determine the optimal solution that maximizes the overall usefulness of the backpack.arrow_forwardFind an optimal solution to the fractional knapsack problem for an Instance with number of items i.e n= 3, Capacity of the sack M=20, profit associated with the items (p1,p2,p3)= (25,24,15) and weight associated with each item (w1,w2,w3)= (18,15,10).arrow_forwardA book salesperson living in New York needs to visit clients in Utah, Jersey, LA, and Milan within a month. The distances between these cities are given in the table in the picture. Find the optimal solution to the problem using the branch-and-bound method.arrow_forward
- QUESTION 9 What is one advantage of AABB over Bounding Spheres? Computing the optimal AABB for a set of points is easy to program and can be run in linear time. Computing the optimal bounding sphere is a much more difficult problem. The volume of AABB can be an integer, while the volume of a Bounding Sphere is always irrational. An AABB can surround a Bounding Sphere, while a Bounding Sphere cannot surround an AABB. To draw a Bounding Ball you need calculus knowledge.arrow_forward8. A school is creating class schedules for its students. The students submit their requested courses and then a program will be designed to find the optimal schedule for all students. The school has determined that finding the absolute best schedule cannot be solved in a reasonablo time. Instead they have decided to use a simpler algorithm that produces a good but non-optimal schedule in a more reasonable amount of time. Which principle does this decision best demonstrate? O A Unreasonable algorithms may sometimes also be undecidable O B. Heuristics can be used to solve some problems for which no reasonable algorithm exsts O C. efficiency Two algorithms that solve the same problem must also have the same O B. Approximate solutions are often identical to optimal solutionsarrow_forwardSolve the following exercise using jupyter notebook for Python, to find the objective function, variables, constraint matrix and print the graph with the optimal solution. A farm specializes in the production of a special cattle feed, which is a mixture of corn and soybeans. The nutritional composition of these ingredients and their costs are as follows: - Corn contains 0.09 g of protein and 0.02 g of fiber per gram, with a cost of.$0.30 per gram.- Soybeans contain 0.60 g of protein and 0.06 g of fiber per gram, at a cost of $0.90 per gram.0.90 per gram. The dietary needs of the specialty food require a minimum of 30% protein and a maximum of 5% fiber. The farm wishes to determine the optimum ratios of corn and soybeans to produce a feed with minimal costs while maintaining nutritional constraints and ensuring that a minimum of 800 grams of feed is used daily. Restrictions 1. The total amount of feed should be at least 800 grams per day.2. The feed should contain at least 30% protein…arrow_forward
- Question: Suppose there are n people in a group, each aware of a scandal no one else in the group knows about. These people communicate by telephone; when two people in the group talk, they share information about all scandals each knows about. For example, on the first call, two people share information, so by the end of the call, each of these people knows about two scandals. The gossip problem asks for G(n), the minimum number of telephone calls that are needed for all n people to learn about all the scandals. a). Find G(1), G(2), G(3), and G(4). b). Use mathematical induction to prove that G(n) 4. [Hint: In the inductive step, have a new person call a particular person at the start and at the end.] c). Prove that G(n)= 2n – 4 for n> 4.arrow_forwardSuppose the risk index for the stock fund (the value of ) increases from its current value of 8 to 12. How does the optimal solution change, if at all? Suppose the risk index for the money market fund (the value of ) increases from its current value of 3 to 3.5. How does the optimal solution change, if at all? Suppose increases to 12 and increases to 3.5. How does the optimal solution change, if at all?arrow_forwardConsider the following problem: You are baby-sitting n children and have m > n cookies to divide between them. You must give each child exactly one cookie (of course, you cannot give the same cookie to two different children). Each child has a greed factor gi, 1 ≤ i ≤ n which is the minimum size of a cookie that the child will be content with; and each cookie has a size sj , 1 ≤ j ≤ m. Your goal is to maximize the number of content children, i.e.., children i assigned a cookie j with gi ≤ sj. Give a correct greedy algorithm for this problem, prove that it finds the optimal solution, and give an efficient implementation.arrow_forward
- A person is cutting a long board of wood into different length of pieces. Each cutting has fixed width 2 cm lengths. Given that each cutting with different length has a different price, Now, we are required to help this person to find the optimal cuts in order to increase his income. Consider following example showing different cut's lengths and their equivalent prices. Input: board length = 4 Length [] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Price [ 1= [2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 19, 20] Output: Best cut is two pieces of length 2 each to gain revenue of 6 + 6 = 12 [Explanation: the possible cuts and profit of each is as follows: Cut Profit 4 1,3 2,2 3,1 1,1,2 1,2,1 2,1,1 1,1,1,1 10 (2+8) = 10 (6+6) = 12 (8+2) = 10 (2+2+6) = 10 (2+6+2) = 10 (6+2+2) = 10 (2+2+2+2) = 8 As noted the best cut is two pieces of length 2 each to gain revenue of 6+ 6 = 12 To answer question 1, you need to do the following: 1. Write an algorithm to find the optimal cuts in order to increase the person income's 2. Implement the…arrow_forwardA person is cutting a long board of wood into different length of pieces . Each cutting has fixed width 2 cm lengths. Given that each cutting with different length has a different price, Now, we are required to help this person to find the optimal cuts in order to increase his income. Consider following example showing different cut’s lengths and their equivalent prices. Input: board length = 4 Length [ ] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Price [ ] = [2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 19, 20] Output: Best cut is two pieces of length 2 each to gain revenue of 6 + 6 = 12 [Explanation: the possible cuts and profit of each is as follows: As noted the best cut is two pieces of length 2 each to gain revenue of 6 + 6 = 12arrow_forwardplease solve step py step no code . Find an optimal solution to the fractional knapsack problem for an instancewith number of items 5, Capacity of the sack W=15, profit associated withthe items (p1,p2,…,p5)= (15,7,6,18,3) and weight associated with each item(w1,w2,…,w7)= (2,3,5,7,4, ).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks Cole
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Brooks Cole